岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2215-2223.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1495

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验

杨长卫1, 2,童心豪2,王栋1,谭信荣1,郭雪岩2,曹礼聪2   

  1. 1. 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司 科学技术研究院,四川 成都 610031;2. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-29 修回日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-10
  • 作者简介:杨长卫,男,1987年生,博士,副研究员,博士生导师,主要从事高速铁路防灾减灾与岩土工程抗震等方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国铁路总公司科研试验任务(No.SY2016G003);四川省科技计划项目——苗子工程(No.18MZGC0186);中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科研项目(No. KYY2019145(19-20))

Shaking table test of dynamic response law of subgrade with ballast track under earthquake

YANG Chang-wei1, 2, TONG Xin-hao2, WANG Dong1, TAN Xin-rong1, GUO Xue-yan2, CAO Li-cong2   

  1. 1. Institute of Science and Technology, China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2019-08-29 Revised:2019-12-30 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-10
  • Contact: 曹礼聪,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程抗震方面的研究。E-mail: caolicong123@126.com E-mail:1209732335@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Experiment Task of China Railways Corporation (SY2016G003), Sichuan Science and Technology Program—Seedling Engineering (18MZGC0186) and the Research Project of China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd. (KYY2019145 (19-20)).

摘要: 以京沪高铁CRH380BL高速动车组为原型,根据相似定律设计完成了1:10比尺的铁路有砟轨道路基振动台模型试验,研究分析了路基的加速度、土压力和位移响应规律。模型尺寸为9.6 m×3.5 m×1.0 m(长×宽×高),包括列车、有砟轨道和路基部分。试验结果证明:随高程增加,水平加速度峰值放大系数逐渐增大,基本上稳定在1.0~2.5,竖向加速度峰值放大系数则呈现先增加后减小的规律,基本稳定在1.5以内。随着输入地震动强度的增大,水平加速度峰值放大系数与高程成正比例关系,非线性关系逐渐增强,竖向加速度峰值放大系数最大值位于距离底部H/3处向2H/3处转移(H为路基高度),在输入峰位加速度(PGA)为0.3g时,水平、竖向加速度峰值放大性均达到最强;随着输入地震动强度的增大,填料中峰值土压力强度逐渐增大,在输入波PGA为0.4g时,土压力强度达到最大,路基中心截面土压力强度随高程增加有先增加后减小的趋势,最大土压力逐渐由距离路基底部H/3向2H/3位置转移;在输入地震波PGA为0.05g时,路基表面、路基底部的土压力强度沿着路基体水平方向呈线性分布,前者离路基越远、土压力越大,后者则是基本不变。在输入地震波PGA为0.15g、0.30g、0.40g时,土压力强度在道砟边缘处最小,在路基中心下土压力强度其次,整体沿着路基体水平方向呈三角形分布;路基坡面中部和顶部的水平位移逐渐增大,前者小于后者,呈近似线性分布,且两者差值逐渐减小。在路基顶部位置,坡面上的位移与路基中心线顶部的位移差值随着输入地震动强度的增大,两者差值逐渐增大,最后区域稳定;地震波在路堤底部时主频集中在5~15 Hz,随着高程增加,路基对30~40 Hz频段有强烈的放大效应,在其余频段的影响不明显。

关键词: 高速铁路, 有砟轨道, 路基, 振动台试验

Abstract: Taking the Beijing-Shanghai high-speed railway CRH380BL EMU as the prototype, a 1:10 ratio railway ballast track subgrade shaking table model test was carried out based on the law of similarity to analyze the acceleration, earth pressure and displacement response of the subgrade. The model is 9.6 m×3.5 m×1.0 m (length×width×height), including the train, ballasted track and subgrade part. Some findings are as follow. As the altitude increases, the amplification factor of peak horizontal acceleration increases gradually, and the value is basically stable between 1.0 and 2.5; while the amplification factor of peak vertical acceleration firstly increases and then decreases, and the value is basically stable within 1.5. As the input ground motion intensity increases, the amplification factor of the peak horizontal acceleration is directly proportional to the elevation, and the non-linear relationship is gradually strengthened. The maximum amplification factor of vertical peak acceleration is shifted from the bottom H/3 to 2H/3 and the peak magnification of horizontal and vertical accelerations reach the maximum when the input seismic wave PGA is 0.3g. As the input ground motion intensity increases, the peak earth pressure intensity in the filler increases gradually. When the input seismic wave PGA reaches 0.4g, the earth pressure intensity reaches the maximum. The earth pressure intensity at the center section of the subgrade tends to increase firstly and then decrease with the increase of elevation, and the maximum earth pressure gradually shifts from H/3 to 2H/3 at the bottom of the subgrade. When the input seismic wave PGA is 0.05g, the earth pressure intensity on the subgrade surface and the subgrade bottom is linearly distributed along the horizontal direction of the subgrade. The farther the former is from the subgrade, the greater the earth pressure, and the latter is basically unchanged. When the input seismic wave PGA is 0.15g, 0.30g and 0.40g, the earth pressure intensity is the smallest at the edge of the ballast, followed by the earth pressure intensity at the center of the subgrade, and the earth pressure presents a triangular distribution along the horizontal direction of the subgrade; the horizontal displacement of the middle and top of the subgrade slope gradually increases, and the former is smaller than the latter, showing an approximately linear distribution and the gradual reduction in the difference between them. At the top of the subgrade, the difference between the displacement on the slope and that on the top of the center line of the subgrade increases gradually with the intensity of the input ground motion intensity, and the difference between both gradually increases, and the stable finally; When the seismic wave is at the bottom of the embankment, the main frequency is concentrated in 5?15 Hz. As the elevation increases, the subgrade has a strong amplification effect on the 30?40 Hz frequency band, but the influence on the remaining frequency bands is not significant.

Key words: high-speed railway, ballast track, subgrade, shaking table test

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[2] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[3] 郑舒文, 刘松玉, 李迪, 童立元, 吴恺, . 膨胀土基泡沫轻质土力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1455-1465.
[4] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[5] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[6] 卢正, 李梦威, 唐楚轩, 胡智, 赵阳, 则志辉, 姚海林, . 考虑不同级配影响的填石路基压实质量评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3346-3354.
[7] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[8] 陈康, 刘先峰, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 马杰, 陈忆涵, . 干湿循环下石灰改良红层泥岩填料力学性能劣化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 43-54.
[9] 赵阳, 卢正, 颜廷舟, 李剑, 唐楚轩, 邱煜, 姚海林, . 土工格室加筋路基振动压实行为及预应力效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 771-782.
[10] 刘吉福. 排水固结堤坝稳定分析新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 106-114.
[11] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[12] 汪淼, 任昊铭, 王凡超, 章定文, . 黏土含量对沿河公路路基抗冲刷性能的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 187-194.
[13] TIEP Pham Duc, TU Nguyen Van, PHONG Pham Duc, CHINH Mai Viet, PHONG Nguyen Viet. 采石场粉尘和海砂混合物力学性能试验和数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2728-2740.
[14] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[15] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!