岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2293-2303.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1412

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构掌子面三维破坏模型构建与极限支护力计算

刘克奇1,丁万涛1, 2,陈瑞1,侯铭垒1   

  1. 1. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南250061;2. 山东大学 齐鲁交通学院,山东 济南 250002
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-19 修回日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:刘克奇,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事盾构隧道施工环境影响及隧道长期稳定性方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41572275)

Construction of three-dimensional failure model of shield tunnel face and calculation of the limit supporting force

LIU Ke-qi1, DING Wan-tao1, 2, CHEN Rui1, HOU Ming-lei1   

  1. 1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China; 2. School of Qilu Transportation, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250002, China
  • Received:2019-08-19 Revised:2019-12-30 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Contact: 丁万涛,男,1975年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程稳定性及耐久性方面的教学和研究。E-mail: dingwantao@sdu.edu.cn E-mail: liukeqi627@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41572275)。

摘要: 为明确盾构施工掌子面滑移破坏机制并确定掌子面支护力的合理范围,基于滑移线理论和极限分析上限定理,利用空间离散技术提出了一种盾构施工掌子面三维滑移破裂模型。依据大主应力拱理论计算滑移区顶部竖向土压力值,并以此作为滑移破坏区上部的竖向荷载计算掌子面极限支护力。研究表明,土拱效应显著影响掌子面前方土体竖向应力的大小及分布规律;将本模型与已有研究方法进行比较,验证了本模型获取的掌子面极限支护力极限分析上限解在黏性土地层以及摩擦土地层中的适用性。同时本模型构建的掌子面破坏区域形态更加贴近离心试验结果与数值计算结果。

关键词: 极限分析, 上限定理, 关联流动法则, 土拱效应, 极限支护力

Abstract: To clarify the sliding failure mechanism of the shield tunnel face and determine the reasonable range of the supporting force during shield construction, a three-dimensional slip rupture model for the shield tunnel face was proposed by using the spatial discretization technique based on the slip line theory and the upper bound theorem of limit analysis. According to the large principal stress arch theory, the vertical earth pressure at the top of the slip zone was calculated, and the limit supporting force of the tunnel was calculated by using the vertical load on the upper part of the slip damage zone. The results show that the soil arching effect significantly affects the magnitude and the distribution of vertical stress in front of the tunnel face. By comparing proposed model with existing approaches, it is found that the upper bound solution of limit supporting force obtained from the new model has good applicability in both purely cohesive soils and frictional soils. At the same time, the shape of the damaged area on the tunnel face is fairly consistent with the results from the centrifuge model test and numerical calculation.

Key words: limit analysis, upper bound theorem, associated flow rule, arching effect, limit supporting force

中图分类号: TU 921
[1] 李小刚, 武守信, 冯君, . 基于极限分析理论的悬索桥重力锚垂直齿坎抗滑力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2547-2558.
[2] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[3] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[4] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[5] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[6] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[7] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[8] 娄旭龙, 张泽瑞, 孔德琼, 陈星潮, 朱斌, . 深海重型管道管土相互作用大变形极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3234-3242.
[9] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[10] 戴北冰, 袁新, 周锡文, 刘锋涛, . 考虑间断速度场的光滑有限元极限分析上限法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
[11] 石修松, 周高涨, 刘磊磊, . 基于非线性Hvorslev面的超固结土层隧道掌子面稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2595-2610.
[12] 孙锐, 阳军生, 张庆贺, 杨峰, . 基于网格自适应加密策略的隧道稳定性三维极限分析下限有限元法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1256-1264.
[13] 张治国, 罗杰, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 孙苗苗, . 基于极限分析上限法的地震作用下分层地基 盾构隧道开挖面稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 1201-1213.
[14] 冯嵩, 郑颖人, 高红, . 岩土常规三轴Drucker-Prager准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 2919-2928.
[15] 朱克文, 俞剑, 黄茂松, . 饱和黏土中抗拔桩上限承载力分析及土塞效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1995-2004.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!