岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2722-2729.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1724

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

隧道变形过程中电磁辐射强度参数的变化规律

刘成禹1,2,石俊杰1,罗洪林1,程凯1,陈博文1   

  1. 1. 福州大学 环境与资源学院,福建 福州 350116;2. 福州大学 地质工程福建省高校工程研究中心,福建 福州 350116
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-23 修回日期:2020-03-04 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-18
  • 作者简介:刘成禹,男,1970年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程地质、隧道与地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41272300);中铁隧道局集团有限公司科技创新重点项目(隧研合:2018-53)。

Variation law of electromagnetic radiation intensity parameters during tunnel deformation

LIU Cheng-yu1, 2, SHI Jun-jie1, LUO Hong-lin1, CHENG Kai1, CHEN Bo-wen1   

  1. 1. College of Environment and Resources, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China; 2. Research Center of Geological Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350116, China
  • Received:2019-10-23 Revised:2020-03-04 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-18
  • Supported by:
    The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272300) and the Major Projects of Scientific and Technological Innovation of CRTG (2018–53).

摘要: 根据丽江至香格里拉铁路中义隧道变形及电磁辐射的现场监测资料,对隧道变形过程中的电磁辐射特性及电磁辐射强度极大峰值事件数N、超过强度平均值的极大峰值事件数M与隧道水平收敛变形的关系进行了统计分析。研究表明:(1)电磁辐射最大强度平均值E在初期支护破坏前,随隧道变形的增大而增大,初期支护破坏后,随隧道变形的增大而减少,电磁辐射最大强度平均值先升后降的出现时间与初期支护破坏的时间接近。(2)电磁辐射强度极大峰值事件数、超过强度平均值的极大峰值事件数的波动速率 、 与隧道变形速率呈正线性相关关系;电磁辐射强度极大峰值事件数、超过强度平均值的极大峰值事件数的百分比 、 与隧道累计变形呈正线性相关关系。结论对深化地下洞室变形过程中的电磁辐射特性的认识,提高电磁辐射监测技术的现场应用水平具有指导意义。

关键词: 隧道, 电磁辐射, 强度, 变形, 事件

Abstract: Based on the on-site monitoring data of deformation and electromagnetic radiation of Zhongyi Railway Tunnel of Lijiang-Shangrila, a statistical analysis was done on the characteristics of electromagnetic radiation, the relationship between the events of maximum peaks of EME intensity (N) and horizontal convergence deformation, and the relationship between the events of maximum peaks of EME intensity exceeding the average intensity (M) and horizontal convergence deformation during the deformation of the tunnel. The results show that: 1) The maximum average value of electromagnetic radiation intensity (E) increased with deformation expanding before the initial support yielded, while there was an opposite trend after the initial support yield failure. The turning time point of rising first and then falling of the maximum average value of electromagnetic radiation intensity was close to the initial support yielding. 2) The events fluctuation rate of maximum peaks of EME intensity ( ) and maximum peaks of EME intensity exceeding the average intensity ( ) were positively correlated with convergence deformation rate of the tunnel. There were positively linear relationships between the percentage of events of the maximum peaks of EME intensity ( ), the maximum peaks of EME intensity exceeding the average intensity ( ) and the cumulative deformation of the tunnel as well. Research conclusions are important in the perspective of advancing the understanding of electromagnetic radiation characteristics during the deformation process of underground cavern and enhancing the field application level of monitoring technology of electromagnetic radiation.

Key words: tunnel, electromagnetic radiation, intensity, deformation, event

中图分类号: TU 454
[1] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[2] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[3] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[4] 张治国, 李乃义, 牛瑞, 王安源, 朱正国, . 考虑中导洞施工效应的双连拱隧道应力与位移复变函数解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 141-158.
[5] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[6] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[7] 杨烜宇, 王勇, . 考虑不同凸起体宽度的规则形态土−岩界面剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 195-204.
[8] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[9] 张治国, 陈胤吉, 朱正国, 魏纲, 孙苗苗, . 软土小曲率盾构隧道开挖诱发黏弹性地层沉降的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 309-321.
[10] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[11] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[12] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[13] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[14] 黄德昕, 温韬, 陈宁生, . 考虑能量演化的岩石残余强度确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2825-2836.
[15] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!