岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 324-332.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0863

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层挡土墙试验研究

郑俊杰1,邵安迪1,谢明星2,景丹1   

  1. 1. 华中科技大学 土木与水利工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-22 修回日期:2020-11-07 出版日期:2021-02-10 发布日期:2021-02-09
  • 作者简介:郑俊杰,男,1967年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程与隧道研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0800200);国家自然科学基金(No. 51678267,No. 51878313)

Experimental study on retaining wall with EPS cushion under different backfill widths

ZHENG Jun-jie1, SHAO An-di1, XIE Ming-xing2, JING Dan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China 2. School of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2020-06-22 Revised:2020-11-07 Online:2021-02-10 Published:2021-02-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0800200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678267, 51878313).

摘要: 在刚性挡土墙后设置柔性垫层能增大填土的实际侧向位移从而有效减小墙背土压力。通过自制模型箱开展室内试验,模拟了墙后设置EPS(聚苯乙烯土工泡沫)垫层的挡土墙在静止状态和平动模式下的工况,探究了不同填土宽度下设置EPS垫层后挡土墙静止土压力、主动土压力的分布规律,研究EPS垫层参数对其减压性能的影响,定义EPS垫层减压效率对挡土墙后EPS垫层的减压性能进行定量分析。研究结果表明:有限填土工况下,EPS垫层最大减压效率与主动土压力等效减压效率值存在一定的差距,但此时EPS垫层参数对减压效率影响较小;随着填土宽度逐渐增大至半无限土体范围,EPS垫层的最大减压效率逐渐增大,而后稳定于主动土压力等效减压效率。

关键词: 土压力, 挡土墙, EPS垫层, 模型试验, 有限填土宽度

Abstract: Setting a flexible cushion behind the rigid retaining wall can increase the actual lateral displacement of the backfill and effectively reduce the earth pressure acting on the wall. A self-made model box was used to conduct laboratory tests to simulate the working conditions of the retaining wall with EPS cushion behind the wall in the static state and the translation mode, and to explore the distribution of the static earth pressure and active earth pressure of the retaining wall under different backfill widths, and to study the influence of EPS cushion parameters on its decompression performance. By defining the decompression efficiency of the EPS cushion, the decompression performance of the EPS cushion behind the retaining wall was quantitatively analyzed. The results show that under limited backfill conditions, there is a gap between the maximum decompression efficiency of the EPS cushion and the equivalent decompression efficiency of the active earth pressure. However, under this circumstance, parameters of the EPS cushion have little effect on the decompression efficiency. As the backfill width gradually increases to the semi-infinite soil range, the maximum decompression efficiency of the EPS cushion gradually increases and then keeps stable at the equivalent decompression efficiency of active earth pressure.

Key words: earth pressure, retaining wall, EPS cushion, model test, limited backfill width

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 蔡启航, 董学超, 郭明伟, 卢正, 徐安, 蒋凡, . 基于刃脚土压力的超大锚碇沉井基础下沉智能预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 377-388.
[2] 马滨, 王丽艳, 吉文炜, 吴晗, 蔡晓光, 王炳辉, . 强震下返包胎面加筋挡土墙结构抗震性能模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2792-2804.
[3] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[4] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[5] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[6] 卞海丁, 魏进, 王锦涛. 超大跨径管拱形钢波纹管涵洞的受力特性与土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2532-2546.
[7] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[8] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[9] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[10] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[11] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[12] 孙珊珊, 贾世文, 梁忠旭, 刘墨林, 张常光. 基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1501-1510.
[13] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[14] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[15] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!