岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1925-1932.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1637

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于D-P准则和西原模型的圆形隧道 黏弹−黏塑性解

曹朔1, 2, 3,喻勇1, 2, 3,汪波4   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 力学与工程学院,四川 成都 610031;2. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059; 3. 西南交通大学 应用力学与结构安全四川省重点实验室,四川 成都 610031;4. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-02 修回日期:2021-03-29 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 喻勇,男,1969年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学方面的研究。E-mail: yuyong2000@126.com E-mail: caoshuo2015@126.com
  • 作者简介:曹朔,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事隧道流变力学方面的研究
  • 基金资助:
    地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室开放基金(No. SKLGP2018K020);国家自然科学基金(No. U2034205,No. 51878571)

Viscoelasto-viscoplastic solutions for circular tunnel based on D-P yield criterion and Nishihara model

CAO Shuo1, 2, 3, YU Yong1, 2, 3, WANG Bo4   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China; 3. Applied Mechanics and Structure Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2020-11-02 Revised:2021-03-29 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironmental Protection (SKLGP2018K020) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2034205, 51878571).

摘要: 为了较好地描述圆形隧道开挖后围岩的流变特性,假设围岩本构模型为西原模型,选用Drucker-Prager屈服准则,考虑塑性区的黏性与剪胀特性,推导了圆形隧道开挖后围岩塑性区半径、应力、位移的理论解。当剪胀角 =0°时,这些解答转化为体积不变假设下基于Mohr-Coulomb准则和西原模型的黏弹?黏塑性解。通过具体算例,分析了剪胀角对塑性区半径、洞壁位移和应力场的影响。将黏弹?黏塑性位移解和黏弹?塑性位移解进行了对比分析。结果表明:围岩达到稳态之前,剪胀角对应力场和塑性区半径影响较小,对洞壁位移影响较大。稳态围岩的应力场和塑性区半径与剪胀角取值无关。稳态围岩洞壁位移随着剪胀角的增大有较为明显的增加。塑性区的黏性特性对围岩的稳态应力没有影响,对围岩的稳态洞壁位移有较大的影响。剪胀角较大时,应考虑塑性区的黏性,否则会低估稳态围岩洞壁位移。研究结果对实际工程有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 黏弹?黏塑性, 西原模型, 剪胀, Drucker-Prager屈服准则, 理论解

Abstract: In order to characterize the rheological properties of surrounding rocks after the excavation of circular tunnel, theoretical solutions of radius, stress and displacement of the plastic zone for surrounding rocks after the excavation of circular tunnel are derived by using the Drucker-Prager yield criterion and considering the viscosity and dilatancy characteristics of plastic zone, assuming the constitutive model of surrounding rocks as the Nishihara model. When the dilatancy angle is 0, the solutions change into viscoelastic-viscoplastic solutions based on the Nishihara model and Mohr-Coulomb criterion under the assumption of constant volume. The effects of dilatancy angle on the radius of plastic zone, tunnel-wall displacement and stress field are analyzed. The solutions for viscoelastic-viscoplastic displacement and viscoelastic-plastic displacement are compared and analyzed. The results show that before the surrounding rock reaches the steady state, the effects of dilatancy angle on the stress field and the radium of plastic zone are relatively smaller while the effects of dilatancy angle on the tunnel-wall displacement is relatively larger. The stress field and the radium of plastic zone for stable surrounding rocks are independent of the value of dilatancy angle, however, the tunnel-wall displacement of steady-state rock increases obviously with the dilatancy angle. When the dilatancy angle is large, the viscosity of plastic zone should be considered; otherwise the tunnel-wall displacement of steady-state surrounding rocks will be underestimated. The research results are of certain reference value for practical engineering.

Key words: viscoelastic-viscoplastic, Nishihara model, dilatancy, Drucker-Prager yield criterion, theoretical solution

中图分类号: U 451
[1] 李培楠, 刘学, 戴泽余, 翟一欣, 张弛, 寇晓勇, 范杰, 甄亮, 王长虹, . 曲线顶管底幕法水下沉船打捞顶推力计算模型与施工扰动分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 403-418.
[2] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[3] 胡丰慧, 方祥位, 申春妮, 王春艳, 邵生俊, . 真三轴条件下珊瑚砂颗粒破碎、强度和剪胀性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2147-2159.
[4] 徐斌, 陈柯好, 庞锐, . 超固结黏土的剪胀方程及边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 449-456.
[5] 陈怀林, 杨涛, 饶云康, 张哲, 吴红刚, 谢江伟, 滕汉卿. 基于分段式滑面应力测试系统的滑面应力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[6] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[7] 宋洋, 王贺平, 张维东, 赵立财, 周健华, 毛镜涵, . 恒定法向刚度条件下加锚充填节理岩体剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2695-2706.
[8] 张常光, 周渭, 徐灏, 赵帅, 孙珊珊, . 基于统一强度理论的扰损围岩巷道脆塑性解答[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1343-1355.
[9] 徐斌, 王星亮, 庞锐, 陈柯好, . 考虑组构演化的砂砾土弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(11): 3197-3211.
[10] 崔新壮, 姜鹏, 王艺霖, 金青, 陈璐, . 高摩阻超静定土工格栅在粗粒土夹层中的剪胀作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 141-152.
[11] 李超, 莫品强, 李树忱, . 基于能量理论的球孔扩张大变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2017-2027.
[12] 赵顺利, 杨之俊, 傅旭东, 方正, . 考虑应变局部化的粗粒料剪切损伤力学机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 31-42.
[13] 蒋长宝, 余塘, 魏文辉, 段敏克, 杨阳, 魏财, . 加卸载应力作用下煤岩渗透率演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 13-22.
[14] 陈泰江, 向欣, 章广成, . 基于线黏弹性接触的落石冲击地面参量理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2410-2420.
[15] 刘燕晶, 王路君, 朱斌, 陈云敏, . 考虑填充和黏结作用的含水合物 沉积物弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2471-2482.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!