岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1933-1943.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1504

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环下考虑裂隙发育的残积土边坡响应分析

刘越1, 2,陈东霞1, 3,王晖4,于佳静1   

  1. 1. 厦门大学 建筑与土木工程学院,福建 厦门 361005;2. 福建省地质灾害重点实验室,福建 福州 350002; 3. 厦门市交通基础设施智能管养工程技术研究中心,福建 厦门 361005;4. 四川都江堰市经济开发区管委会,四川 都江堰,611830
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-10 修回日期:2021-04-09 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-19
  • 作者简介:刘越,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事残积土基坑或边坡稳定性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    自然资源部丘陵山地地质灾害防治重点实验室(福建省地质灾害重点实验室)开放基金(No. FJKLGH2021K004);厦门市交通基础设施智能管养工程技术研究中心开放基金(No. TCIMI201804)。

Response analysis of residual soil slope considering crack development under drying-wetting cycles

LIU Yue1, 2, CHEN Dong-xia1, 3, WANG Hui4, YU Jia-jing1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China; 2. Fujian Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China; 3. Xiamen Engineering Technology Center for Intelligent Maintenance of Infrastructure, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China; 4. Administrative Committee of Dujiangyan Economic Development Zone, Dujiangyan, Sichuan 611830, China
  • Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2021-04-09 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention of Hilly Mountains, Ministry of Natural Resources (Fujian Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention) (FJKLGH2021K004) and Xiamen Transportation Infrastructure Intelligent Management Engineering Technology Research Center Open Fund (TCIMI201804).

摘要: 为研究带裂隙的花岗岩残积土边坡在反复干湿循环作用下的响应规律,利用模型试验模拟干湿循环过程,通过处理裂隙图像量化裂隙宽度扩展,结合坡内土体直剪试验,推导强度衰减规律和裂隙深度相关的计算公式。对比模型试验和数值模拟结果,分析考虑裂隙发育下的残积土边坡响应情况,结果如下:干湿循环下残积土裂隙宽度扩展符合Logistic模型,裂隙深度与强度衰减有确定的量化关系,且随着干湿循环次数增加,裂隙深度趋于稳定;干湿循环次数较少时,坡底位置含水率变化明显滞后于坡顶和坡中位置,但随着干湿循环次数增加及裂隙扩展,边坡各位置的含水率变化趋于一致。裂隙扩展对边坡各位置变形均有影响,随着干湿循环次数增加,考虑裂隙扩展的坡底和坡中位置变形与不考虑裂隙的情况趋于一致,但坡顶区域变形更大,致使裂隙边坡的坡顶与坡底的变形差距增加。

关键词: 干湿循环作用, 花岗岩残积土, 裂隙, 含水率, 变形

Abstract: In order to study the response of granite residual soil slope with cracks under different number of drying-wetting cycles (D-W cycles), model test was carried out and the crack width expansion index was quantified by investigating the crack images. Based on the direct shear test, the calculation formulas of soil strength degradation and crack depth were developed. Then, the model test and the numerical simulation results were compared to analyze the response of the residual soil slope considering crack extension. The results showed that the fractures width expansion in residual soil under D-W cycles followed the Logistic model, and there was a quantitative relationship between fracture depth and strength degradation. The fracture depth tended to be stable with the increase of D-W cycles. When the number of D-W cycles was small, the change of moisture content at the bottom of the slope lags significantly behind that at the top and the middle of the slope, however, the change of moisture content at each position of the slope tended to be the same with the increase of D-W cycles. The deformation at the bottom and the middle of the slope with the crack expansion tended to be the same compared to the slope without cracks, however, the deformation at the top area was larger, which led to the increase of the deformation gap between the top and bottom of the cracked slope.

Key words: drying-wetting cycles, granite residual soil, crack, moisture content, deformation

中图分类号: TU 457
[1] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[2] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[3] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[4] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[5] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[6] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[7] 李槟, 申海萌, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 不同围压条件下花岗岩剪切过程渗透率动态演化规律数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 437-453.
[8] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[9] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[10] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[11] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[12] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[13] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[14] 刘一鸣, 李振, 冯国瑞, 杨鹏, 白锦文, 黄炳雄, 李东, . 循环加卸载下裂隙砂岩声−热响应特征及前兆规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2773-2791.
[15] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!