岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1971-1982.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1471

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多级拼装悬臂式挡墙地震永久位移计算方法

何江1,肖世国2   

  1. 1. 中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司,四川 成都610031;2. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院,四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-29 修回日期:2021-04-06 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 肖世国,男,1973年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事边坡稳定性与支挡结构方面的研究工作。E-mail: xiaoshiguo@swjtu.cn E-mail: hejiangmail@163.com
  • 作者简介:何江,男,1995年生,硕士,主要从事路基工程设计与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51578466);中铁二院工程集团有限责任公司科研项目(No. KYY2018100(18-19))。

Calculation method for seismic permanent displacement of assembled multi-step cantilever retaining walls

HE Jiang1, XIAO Shi-guo2   

  1. 1. China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610031, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2020-09-29 Revised:2021-04-06 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578466) and the Research Project of China Railway Eryuan Engineering Group Co. Ltd.(KYY2018100(18–19)).

摘要: 为确定新型的多级拼装悬臂式挡墙的地震永久位移,基于墙?坡系统整体滑面过最下一级墙踵板下边缘的旋转滑动破坏模式,采用极限分析上限法及拟静力法,得出墙?坡系统地震屈服加速度系数表达式,进而结合Newmark滑块法,对系统产生的转动角加速度进行二次积分得到其角位移,分别推导出了Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级拼装悬臂式挡墙各级墙顶地震水平永久位移计算公式。通过与Ⅲ级墙、Ⅱ级墙模型振动台试验及数值模拟对比,表明在不同地震波作用下,理论算法得到的Ⅲ级墙、Ⅱ级墙模型各级墙顶水平永久位移比试验值分别约大10%~40%、10%~30%,但其与数值模拟结果较为接近。实例分析进一步表明,理论算法一般比数值模拟结果相对偏保守;填土内摩擦角、黏聚力和单级墙体高度对墙?坡系统的水平屈服加速度分别呈较显著的正相关和负相关影响,而各级墙体间的平台宽度、单级墙底板长度和厚度对其影响较小;多级墙的分级数对水平屈服加速度有明显的非线性与正相关的影响特征;填料颗粒越细,对限制墙?坡系统地震永久位移的效果就越显著。

关键词: 多级拼装悬臂式挡墙, 极限分析上限法, Newmark滑块法, 永久位移, 振动台试验

Abstract: To determine seismic permanent displacement of a new type of assembled multi-step cantilever retaining walls, based on overall rotation-sliding failure mode of the wall-slope system with potential slip surface passing by the bottom edge of the heel plate of the lowest wall member, the seismic yield acceleration coefficient of the wall-slope system is proposed by the upper bound limit analysis and pseudo-static method. Moreover, according to Newmark’s block method, calculation formulas of seismic horizontal permanent displacement at the top of each step of the wall including two, three, and four steps are derived via angular displacement of the wall-slope system determined by quadratic integration of the rotational angular acceleration. Compared with shaking table tests and numerical simulations of the wall models with two and three steps, the horizontal permanent displacements under two-step and three-step walls calculated by the proposed analysis method are 10-40% and 10-30% larger than those by the tests, respectively. However, the theoretical results are relatively close to the numerical simulation results. Analysis results of the practical example show that the proposed method is generally more conservative than the numerical simulation method. Internal friction angle and cohesion of the backfill have greatly positive correlation with the horizontal yield acceleration of the wall-slope system, while the height of a wall member has obvious negative correlation with the horizontal yield acceleration of the wall-slope system. However, width of the bench between vertically adjacent wall members, length and thickness of bottom plate of a wall member have little effect on it. In addition, the total number of the vertically assembled walls has nonlinear and positive correlation with the horizontal yield acceleration, and the seismic horizontal permanent displacement of the system is decreasing as the filling soil particle size decreases gradually.

Key words: assembled multi-step cantilever retaining walls, upper bound limit analysis, Newmark’s block method, permanent displacement, shaking table test

中图分类号: U 417.1+1
[1] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[2] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[3] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[4] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[5] 戴北冰, 袁新, 周锡文, 刘锋涛, . 考虑间断速度场的光滑有限元极限分析上限法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2849-2858.
[6] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[7] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[8] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[9] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[11] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[12] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[13] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
[14] 张聪, 冯忠居, 林路宇, 周桂梅, 陈露, . 震陷场地变截面单桩动力特性与损伤评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3037-3046.
[15] 冯海洲, 蒋关鲁, 何梓雷, 郭玉丰, 胡金山, 李杰, 袁胜洋, . 预应力锚索桩板墙加固隧道洞口边坡的动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 50-62.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!