岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1335-1340.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.2038

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土壤热参数及其影响因素测试分析

金宗川1,王雪晴2, 3,乌效鸣1,彭赟2, 4   

  1. 1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 3. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;4. 桂林理工大学 土木与建筑工程学院,广西 桂林 541004
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-03 修回日期:2022-03-20 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 王雪晴,女,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事工程地质和水文地质方面的研究。E-mail:wangxueqing201@mails.ucas.ac.cn E-mail:jinzongchuan@sgidi.com
  • 作者简介:金宗川,男,1970年生,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事工程地质、水文地质、岩土测试与地基处理等方面的研究和实践。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41772336)。

Testing and analysis of soil thermal parameters and their influencing factors

JIN Zong-chuan1, WANG Xue-qing2, 3, WU Xiao-ming1, PENG Yun2, 4   

  1. 1. School of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 4. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
  • Received:2021-12-03 Revised:2022-03-20 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772336).

摘要: 热性质是岩土体基本的物理性质之一,用以评价热量在其中的保持、传导和分布状况,以导热系数、比热容和热扩散系数最为常见,这些参数也是地热能管理与开发、工程冷冻开挖、寒区工程设计与施工的重要参数。已有研究表明,土壤热参数与土质、来源、含水率、密度等因素有关。通过广东湛江某工地粉质黏土和黏土的热参数测试结果分析发现:随含水率的增大,粉质黏土导热系数和热扩散系数的变化趋势是先增加至最大值,然后减小,而比热容基本呈线性增大。干密度对粉质黏土导热系数的影响与含水率大小有关,当含水率不超过20.0%时,其随干密度的增加而增大,而当含水率超过27.5%后,其随干密度的增加有减小趋势;当含水率在24.5%(液限)左右时,基本没有规律可循。干密度对粉质黏土热扩散系数影响规律不明显。黏土的导热系数和比热容都随含水率和干密度的增加而增大;热扩散系数随含水率的升高整体表现为非线性增加至稳定,在低含水率下干密度的影响不明显,在较高含水率下随干密度的增加热扩散系数先增大后减小。较大颗粒的存在导致粉质黏土的导热性较黏土复杂。

关键词: 导热系数, 体积比热容, 热扩散系数, 含水率, 干密度

Abstract: Thermal property is one of the basic physical properties of rock and soil, and it is widely used to evaluate the retention, conduction and distribution of the heat. Thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity and thermal conductivity are the most common parameters, and they are also used in geothermal energy management and development, engineering freezing excavation and construction design in cold areas. The existing studies have shown that soil thermal parameters are associate to some factors such as the soil types, source, water content, density. In this study, the thermal parameters of silty clay and clay at a construction site in Zhanjiang, Guangdong province were tested. The results show that with increasing water contents, the thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity of silty clay increase to a maximum value and then decrease, while the specific heat capacity increases linearly. The effect of dry density on thermal conductivity of silty clay depends on the moisture. When the water content is less than 20.0%, the thermal conductivity increases with the increase of dry density, while the water content is over 27.5%, it decreases with the increase of dry density. At the water content of about 24.5% (liquid limit), there is no law to follow. The effect of dry density on thermal diffusivity of silty clay is not obvious. Both the thermal conductivity and specific heat capacity of clay increase with the increase of water content and dry density. As the water content increases, the thermal diffusivity increases nonlinearly until it is stable. Under a low water content, the dry density does not significantly affect the thermal diffusivity; however the thermal diffusivity increases firstly and then decreases with increasing dry densities under the high water content. In addition, it is also found that the existence of large particles can cause the thermal conductivity of silty clay to be more complicated than that of clay.

Key words: thermal conductivity, volume specific heat capacity, thermal diffusivity, moisture content, dry density

中图分类号: TU 411
[1] 王勇, 顾凯, 张博, 姜霖, 施斌, . 基于分布式温度测试和重建的浅表土体含水率反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 531-540.
[2] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[3] 李新明, 何永飞, 谈云志, 任克彬, 张先伟, 尹松, . 不同含水率下石灰−偏高岭土改良遗址土宏微观特性的冻融循环效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2894-2906.
[4] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 刘欣宇, 李亚博. 含水率和剪切速率对黏性滑带土剪切行为及损伤演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2471-2482.
[5] 杨爱武, 程姝晓, 梁振振, 华谦谦, 杨少朋. 高含水率吹填土大变形固结与流变叠加效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 1977-1987.
[6] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[7] 姜海波, 卢燕, 李琳, 张军, . 干湿-冻融作用输水渠道膨胀土强度特性及损伤演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1356-1367.
[8] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[9] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[10] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[11] 许庆钊, 史文豹, 常聚才, 苗壮, 闫澳运, 李传明, 齐潮. 不同加载速率含水煤样力学响应及宏微观破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 881-893.
[12] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[13] 王兵, 胡小波, 孔楠楠. 真空联合电渗加固超细颗粒疏浚土试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[14] 宋二波, 姚仰平, 牛玺荣, . 基于加速度峰值的填土智能压实质量评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3054-3064.
[15] 王莘晴, 张晓超, 裴向军, . 弃渣土体分形级配方程及最大干密度预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3157-3166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!