岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1326-1334.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1330

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单桩与群桩基础动力时程响应差异振动台试验

张聪1,冯忠居1,孟莹莹1,关云辉1,陈慧芸1,王振2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 山东省公路桥梁建设有限公司,山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-12 修回日期:2021-12-20 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 冯忠居,男,1965 年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程与桥梁桩基础工程方面的研究。E-mail: ysf@gl.chd.edu.cn E-mail:zhangcong@chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张聪,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事桥梁桩基础工程方面研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51708040);长安大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(No.300102218115);海南省交通科技项目(No.HNZXY2015- 045R)。

Shaking table test on the difference of dynamic time-history response between single pile and pile group foundation

ZHANG Cong1, FENG Zhong-ju1, MENG Ying-ying1, GUAN Yun-hui1, CHEN Hui-yun1, WANG Zhen2   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Shandong Highway & Bridge Construction Co., Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250014, China
  • Received:2021-08-12 Revised:2021-12-20 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51708040),the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Chang’an University (300102218115) and the Hainan Provincial Transportation Science and Technology Project (HNZXY2015-045R).

摘要: 为探明强震作用下大直径深长单桩与群桩基础的动力时程响应差异,依托海文大桥实体工程,通过大型振动台试验,开展了4种不同类型地震波作用下单桩及群桩基础的桩顶加速度、桩顶相对位移、桩身弯矩时程响应变化规律及其差异性研究。研究结果表明:由于群桩效应的存在,桩顶加速度时程响应呈现双面性,群桩基础桩顶加速度峰值大于单桩基础,但峰值出现时刻滞后于单桩0.29~1.06 s;群桩基础的桩顶相对位移最大值显著小于单桩基础,且出现时刻明显滞后,Kobe波作用时滞后高达3.82 s;群桩基础的桩身弯矩最大值小于单桩基础7.54%~9.22%,且单桩基础受地震波影响较大,弯矩时程响应振幅明显大于群桩基础。桩基础抗震设计时,可充分发挥群桩基础动力时程响应滞后性特点,合理设计并选择最优桩型。

关键词: 桩基础, 强震区, 振动台试验, 时程响应差异

Abstract: In order to ascertain the difference of dynamic time-history response between large-diameter, deep-long single pile and pile group foundation under strong earthquake, a large shaking table test was carried out based on the physical project of Haiwen Bridge. The various rules and differences of pile top acceleration, pile top relative displacement, and pile bending moment between the single pile and pile group foundation under four types of seismic waves were studied. The results show that the time-history response of pile top acceleration is double-sided due to the pile group effect. The peak acceleration of pile group is larger than that of single pile, but the peak time lags behind that of single pile by 0.29–1.06 s. The pile top maximum relative displacement of the group pile is significantly smaller than that of the single pile, and there is an obvious lag in the time. Excited by the Kobe wave, the lag time is as long as 3.82 s. The maximum bending moment of the pile group is 7.54%–9.22% less than that of the single pile. Because the single pile is greatly affected by seismic waves, its amplitude of bending moment time-history response is obviously larger than that of the pile group. In the seismic design of pile foundation, the lag characteristic of dynamic time-history response of the pile group foundation can be fully used to design and select the optimal pile type reasonably.

Key words: piles foundation, strong earthquake area, shaking table test, time-history response difference

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 杨明辉, 蔡明辉, 陈波, 杨汉, . 考虑波致海床动态响应的单桩水平阻抗计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[2] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[3] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[4] 周光远, 干飞, 郑刚, 周海祚, 王宏, 毕靖, 刘彪, 张元胤, . 基于土体变形的端承桩负摩阻力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 930-942.
[5] 赵飞, 石振明, 俞松波, 周圆媛, 李博, 陈建峰, 张清照, 郑鸿超. 层状岩质边坡动力失稳及加固研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3585-3614.
[6] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[7] 田雷, 谢强, 段军, 陶富涛, 班宇鑫, 傅翔, 晏彬淇, . 三向斜锚短桩基础拉拔荷载作用下桩锚节点的受力特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 278-288.
[8] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[9] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[10] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[11] 高鲁超, 戴国亮, 张继生, 万志辉, 姚中原, 王洋, . 软黏土大直径单桩水平循环加载离心机模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2411-2420.
[12] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[13] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[14] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[15] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!