岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2555-2565.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0432

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

复杂初始应力状态下松砂多向循环单剪特性

李尧1,李嘉评2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 青岛市政工程设计研究院,山东 青岛 266000
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-06 接受日期:2023-06-28 出版日期:2023-09-11 发布日期:2023-09-02
  • 作者简介:李尧,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程领域的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51708040)

Multi-directional cyclic simple shear behaviour of loose sand under complex initial stress states

LI Yao1, LI Jia-ping2   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Qingdao Municipal Engineering Design Research Institute, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China
  • Received:2023-04-06 Accepted:2023-06-28 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708040).

摘要: 松砂极易液化,微小的应力状态变化也会影响其液化特性。基于多向循环单剪试验,采用松砂作为试验材料,开展不同静剪应力大小、方向和复杂剪切路径下的循环单剪试验,研究复杂初始应力状态下松砂循环单剪特性,得到以下主要结论:(1)随静剪应力比增大,试样剪应力峰值增大,第1个循环内孔隙水压力增量变大,试样更易液化;初始静剪应力大小对孔隙水压力的影响在剪切初期更显著。(2)随初始静剪应力和动剪应力主轴之间夹角增大,试样在X方向的剪应力峰值减小,试样孔隙水压力加速增长,在第1个循环以及最后1个循环内孔隙水压力增量变大,循环间差值增大,试样更易发生瞬时液化。(3)8字形剪切路径试样的应力−应变滞回圈面积最大,每个循环消耗能量最多,圆形剪切路径次之,直线剪切路径最小。复杂剪切路径会在剪切开始时诱发孔隙水压力的突然增加,加大各循环中孔隙水压力的增量,试样更易液化。(4)影响松砂液化因素的排序为:初始静剪应力与动剪应力夹角、剪切路径、初始静剪应力大小。

关键词: 多向循环单剪试验, 松砂, 复杂初始应力, 液化, 孔隙水压力, 应力路径, 应力反转

Abstract: Loose sand is highly susceptible to liquefaction, and small changes in stress state can affect its liquefaction characteristics. Based on multi-directional cyclic simple shear tests, this study conducted cyclic simple shear tests on loose sand under different magnitudes and directions of static shear stress, and complex shear paths. The cyclic simple shear characteristics of loose sand under complex initial stress states are studied. The main conclusions are drawn as follows: (1) As the static shear stress ratio increases, the peak shear stress of the specimen increases, the increment of pore water pressure in the first cycle increases, and the specimen is more prone to liquefaction. The effect of the magnitude of initial static shear stress on excess pore water pressure is more significant at the early stage of shearing. (2) With the increase of the angle between the initial static shear stress and the main direction of dynamic shear stress, the peak shear stress of the specimen in the X direction decreases, and the pore water pressure of the specimen accelerates to increase. In addition, the increment in pore water pressure in the first cycle and the last cycle increases, and the difference between the cycles increases. The specimen is more prone to sudden liquefaction. (3) The specimen with 8-shaped shear path has the largest area of stress−strain hysteresis loops, which consumes the most energy per cycle, followed by the specimen with the circular shear path, and the specimen with the straight shear path has the smallest area. Complex shear paths can induce a sudden increase in pore water pressure at the beginning of shearing, increasing the increment in pore water pressure in each cycle and making it more prone to liquefaction. (4) The sequence of factors affecting the liquefaction of loose sand is the angle between the initial static shear stress and the dynamic shear stress, the shear path, and the magnitude of the initial static shear stress.

Key words: multi-directional cyclic simple shear test, loose sand, complex initial stress, liquefaction, pore water pressure, stress path, stress reversal

中图分类号: TU411
[1] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[2] 曹祎, 荣传新, 王衍森, 常磊, 王彬, . 冻结钙质黏土复杂应力路径下的力学响应及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2071-2084.
[3] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[4] 倪睿思, 肖世国, 吴兵, 梁瑶, . 基于非线性井阻的饱和软弱土无砂增压式真空预压分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2160-2172.
[5] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[6] 常仕奇, 董晓强, 刘晓凤, 李江山, 刘晓勇, 张豪儒, 黄寅豪, . 水位变动引发干法赤泥堆场坝体失稳的模型试验与数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1122-1130.
[7] FARHAD Jamil, 曾长女, 马媛, SHARAFAT Ali. 初始固结角度对饱和粉质土应变发展的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 527-538.
[8] 秦悠, 龙慧, 吴琪, 庄海洋, 陈国兴. 复杂应力路径下饱和珊瑚砂孔压增长与刚度退化的阈值应变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3441-3450.
[9] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[10] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[11] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[12] 王彪, 陈星欣, 尹清锋, 郭力群, 何明高, . 软土地层盾构地中对接法孔压扰动规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 535-549.
[13] 王贵宾, 刘桓兑, 唐明豪, 杨春和, 陈世万, . 复杂应力路径下的花岗岩洞室开挖损伤区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2539-2553.
[14] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[15] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!