岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (12): 3424-3434.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1960

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土工格室加筋土挡墙静载模型试验研究

屈畅姿1,李梦竹1,刘泽2,魏丽敏3,周详详1,曹峥1   

  1. 1. 湘潭大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411105; 2. 湖南科技大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201;3. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-16 接受日期:2023-04-23 出版日期:2023-12-20 发布日期:2023-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 魏丽敏,女,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事路基工程和桩基工程等方面的研究。E-mail: lmwei@csu.edu.cn E-mail:quchangzi83@xtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:屈畅姿,女,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事交通岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省教育厅优秀青年科学研究项目(No.22B0146);国家自然科学基金(No.51508489,No.51878671)

Model experimental study on geocell-reinforced soil retaining wall under static loading

QU Chang-zi1, LI Meng-zhu1, LIU Ze2, WEI Li-min3, ZHOU Xiang-xiang1, CAO Zheng1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China
  • Received:2022-12-16 Accepted:2023-04-23 Online:2023-12-20 Published:2023-12-21
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project for Outstanding Youth of Hunan Provincial Education Department of China (22B0146) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51508489, 51878671).

摘要: 土工格室加筋土挡墙因其结构轻巧、稳定性高而具有广阔的工程应用前景,均匀长加筋面板式格室挡墙性能尤为良好,但目前相关的试验研究尚少。以拟建的长加筋面板式土工格室挡墙为对象,开展了竖向分级静载作用下的室内模型试验,对挡墙的变形、墙内竖向应力以及格室加筋层应变进行了测试和分析,探讨了均匀长格室层的加筋作用机制。结果表明:竖向荷载作用下,挡墙上部填土沿水平方向产生了中间大、墙面处小的不均匀沉降,埋于其中的格室加筋层因受弯而产生“网兜”效应,合并格室较强的侧限作用,致使部分竖向应力转化为格室的水平应力,多层格室的水平向转化作用使得挡墙底部的竖向应力明显减小,沉降沿水平方向亦趋于均匀分布。挡墙上部的翘起变形使得加筋层对墙面产生向下的拉力,故墙面竖向位移随荷载的增加而迅速增长;且对墙面产生向内收缩的作用,有效限制了上部墙面的水平位移,0.375H~0.75H(H为总墙高)范围内格室墙面水平位移较大,最大值出现在0.375H高处。加筋层应变沿水平方向的分布形式受填筑高度和荷载的影响较小,竖向荷载作用下均匀长加筋面板式格室挡墙的潜在破裂面的剖面线形为距墙踵一定距离的竖向缓变曲线。该成果可为此类土工格室加筋土挡墙的实践应用提供有价值的设计、施工参考。

关键词: 加筋土挡墙, 土工格室, 模型试验, 变形, 格室应变

Abstract: For the advantages of light weight and high stability, the geocell-reinforced soil retaining walls will be widely used in the retaining construction in the near future. The performance of the facing-type geocell retaining wall reinforced by extending geocell layers with uniform spaces over the full height of the wall (FE-type), is better than other types of geocell retaining structures. However, the experimental researches on the FE-type geocell retaining walls are limited at present. The model test in this study was performed on an FE-type geocell retaining wall to examine the mechanical characteristics in terms of deformations and vertical stresses of the retaining wall under vertical static load. The strains of the extended geocell layers were examined and the effect mechanism was also discussed. Results show that the differential settlements of upper fillers of the retaining wall present as larger in the middle than that approaching the face-plate. The tuck net effect of the geocell layers inside the upper fillers owing to bending, and the strong lateral restriction of the geocell layers have transformed parts of vertical forces into the horizontal forces exerting on the geocell layer. Through the transformations of several geocell layers, the vertical stresses significantly decrease and the differential settlements almost disappear at the bottom of the retaining wall. Due to the warping deformation, the upper geocell layers exert downward tensions and inward contractions on the upper face-plates of the retaining wall. Consequently, the vertical displacements of the face-plates increase rapidly with increasing loads. And it also effectively limits the increasing of the horizontal displacements of the face-plate. The horizontal displacements of the face-plates ranging from 0.375H to 0.75H (where H is the height of the retaining wall) are larger than other parts, and the maximum displacement locates at the 0.375H height. The influences of the back filling height and loads on the distribution of the geocell layers strains along the horizontal direction are week. The potential failure surface of the FE-type geocell reinforced retaining wall resembles the curved shape that changes slowly along the vertical direction without penetrating the face-plates. The findings could provide valuable and practical references for the design and construction of the FE-type geocell-reinforced soil retaining wall.

Key words: reinforced-soil retaining wall, geocell, model test, deformation, strain of geocell layer

中图分类号: TU476+.4
[1] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[2] 潘申鑫, 蒋关鲁, 袁胜洋, 刘先峰, 何梓雷, 曹丽君, 周诗广, . 高速铁路整体刚性面板加筋土挡墙地震作用下服役性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[3] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[4] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[5] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[6] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[7] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[8] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[9] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[10] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[11] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[12] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[13] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[14] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[15] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!