岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 3071-3080.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1762

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

深挖方膨胀土边坡时空变形特征分析

胡江1, 2,李星1, 2   

  1. 1. 南京水利科学研究院 水灾害防御全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210029;2. 水利部大坝安全管理中心,江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-20 接受日期:2023-12-04 出版日期:2024-10-09 发布日期:2024-10-11
  • 作者简介:胡江,男,1983年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事水工结构安全监控和病害机理研究。E-mail: huj@nhri.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52179138,No.U2243244,No.52209165)。

Analysis of spatiotemporal deformation characteristics of deep excavated expansive soil slopes

HU Jiang1, 2, LI Xing1, 2   

  1. 1. The National Key Laboratory of Water Disaster Prevention, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China; 2. Dam Safety Management Center of Ministry of Water Resources, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, China
  • Received:2023-11-20 Accepted:2023-12-04 Online:2024-10-09 Published:2024-10-11
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52179138, U2243244, 52209165).

摘要: 深挖方膨胀土边坡受降水、地下水以及地质构造、支护措施等多因素影响,变形呈现复杂的时空异质性。以南水北调中线总干渠陶岔渠首段边坡为例,开展时空变形特征分析。借助变分模态分解、加权多尺度局部异常系数以及聚类分析等数据挖掘方法,分析变形的时间变化规律,识别空间分布特征;阐释降水量、地下水位等因素对边坡变形趋势性、周期性和波动性分量的影响机制;对边坡变形进行分区分析,推测潜在滑动面和滑动体;讨论边坡变形机制。结果表明,边坡变形呈现显著的趋势性变化,还表现出季节性和间歇性。下部变形值较大,往上逐渐减少。上部显著变形区深度为3 m,位于大气影响层内;中部受地下水波动和裂隙密集带影响,显著变形区较深,达11 m;下部受支护体系限制,变形主要位于浅层。上层滞水受雨水补给,波动范围大,导致中上部变形深度较深,在16.5 m深度内仍存在一定变形。潜在滑动面为折线形,前缘受地下水、裂隙密集带和边坡支护体系影响,近似水平。为减少地下水波动对膨胀土胀缩变形的影响,建议采用排水井降排深层地下水。该研究成果可为深挖方膨胀土边坡运行管理和加固处置提供技术支撑。

关键词: 膨胀土, 边坡, 变形, 滑动面, 地下水, 数据挖掘

Abstract: Deep excavated expansive soil slopes are influenced by multiple factors, including precipitation, groundwater, geological structure, and support measures, resulting in complex spatiotemporal heterogeneity in deformation. Using the slope of Taocha canal segment in the middle route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project as a case study, the spatiotemporal deformation characteristics were analyzed. Data mining methods, including variational modal decomposition, weighted multiscale local outlier factor, and clustering analysis, were applied. The temporal variation of deformation was analyzed, and spatial distribution characteristics were identified. The influence mechanisms of factors such as precipitation and groundwater on the trend, periodic, and fluctuating components of deformation were explained. Deformation measuring points were clustered, and potential sliding surfaces and sliding bodies were speculated. The deformation mechanism was discussed, and reinforcement measures were proposed. The results indicate that slope deformation exhibits significant trend changes, as well as seasonal and intermittent fluctuations. Deformation in the lower part is relatively large and gradually decreases upwards. The depth of the significant deformation in the upper part is 3 m, located within the climate-influenced layer. Deformation in the central part is influenced by groundwater fluctuation and dense fissure zones, with a significant deformation depth of up to 11 m. Deformation in the lower part is limited by the retaining system and occurs only in the shallow layer. Perched water in the upper part is replenished by rainwater, causing large fluctuation depths and resulting in deep deformation in the middle and upper parts, and there is a certain degree of deformation within the depth of 16.5 m. The potential sliding surface is a polyline. Due to the influence of groundwater, densely fissure zones, and retaining system, the leading edge is approximately horizontal. Drainage wells should be installed to drain groundwater to reduce the impact of groundwater fluctuations on the swelling-shrinkage deformation of expansive soil. The research results can provide technical support for the operation management and reinforcement disposal of deep excavated expansive soil slopes.

Key words: expansive soil, slope, deformation, sliding surface, groundwater, data mining

中图分类号: TU 443
[1] 王江锋, 吴涵兵, 赵顺利, 杜春雪, 张淼, . 考虑压密变形的某输水隧洞红砂岩加卸载力学演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 121-130.
[2] 吴俊, 闵一凡, 征西遥, 韩晨, 牛富俊, 朱宝林, . 地质聚合物固化淤泥法制备再生细骨料的压缩变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 159-170.
[3] 宋义敏, 王腾腾, 许海亮, 安栋, 蒋孝东. 岩石变形局部化和破裂前兆的应变信息识别研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 171-182.
[4] 吴倩婵, 章荣军, 徐志豪, 杨钊, 郑俊杰, . 絮凝剂对固化流泥强度行为及变形特性的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 205-216.
[5] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[6] 冉龙洲, 袁松, 王希宝, 张廷彪, 刘德军, 黎良仆, . 考虑围岩−盾体−注浆体−管片相互作用的深埋护盾式隧道掘进机法隧道围岩压力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 366-376.
[7] 孙红林, 李巍, 汪莹鹤, 黄国良, 廖昕, 黄亮, . 高铁无砟轨道路基上拱变形原因及防治对策研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 389-402.
[8] 聂耀武, 胡兵, 顾雷雨, 李槟, 周全超, 李文辉, 李琦, 李霞颖, . 二氧化碳地质封存协同上覆煤矿开采的安全风险评估数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 491-506.
[9] 王想君, 李英明, 赵光明, 孟祥瑞, 范朝涛, 付强, . 围岩变形作用下考虑杆体屈服和锚固界面滑移的全长锚固锚杆力学解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2687-2702.
[10] 周雄雄, 黄佳铄, 李若婷, 张建余, . 堆石料湿化变形的修正剑桥模型及其参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2703-2710.
[11] 董源, 胡英国, 刘美山, 李庚泉, 马晨阳. 均质岩石高边坡开挖爆破累积损伤的演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2929-2942.
[12] 张雨坤, 张恒, 李大勇, 项乾, . 桩靴贯入及拔出对邻近吸力基础运动规律和水平承载力的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2325-2338.
[13] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[14] 李林, 季良, 叶飞, 李尧, . 非饱和原状结构性黄土水-力耦合弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2421-2433.
[15] 宋利埼, 章敏, 徐筱, 孙静雯, 俞奎, 李昕尧, . 考虑管片接头转动效应的盾构隧道光纤反演分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2483-2494.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!