岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 980-990.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0625

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响

金磊1,李晶晶1,李新明2, 3,孙翰卿4, 5   

  1. 1. 江苏开放大学 建筑工程学院,江苏 南京 210036;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 中原工学院 建筑工程学院,河南 郑州 450007;4. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510640; 5. 广州市设计院集团有限公司,广东 广州 510620
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-23 接受日期:2024-08-15 出版日期:2025-03-10 发布日期:2025-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 李晶晶,女,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事特殊土力学特性方面的研究。E-mail: smilinglee@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:金磊,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土材料细观力学方面的研究。E-mail: whujinlei@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.12002121);河南省优秀青年基金(No.242300421153);岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室开放基金(No.SKLGME022027)

Finite difference method-discrete element method simulation of flexible boundary conditions and their influence on the drained and undrained triaxial shear behavior of sands

JIN Lei1, LI Jing-jing1, LI Xin-ming2, 3, SUN Han-qing4, 5   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210036, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640, China; 5. Guangzhou Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510620, China
  • Received:2024-05-23 Accepted:2024-08-15 Online:2025-03-10 Published:2025-03-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12002121), Henan Outstanding Youth Science Foundation (242300421153) and the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (SKLGME022027).

摘要: 三轴试验离散元模拟是探究砂土等岩土材料变形破坏机制的一种重要手段,合理地模拟侧向边界是三轴试验离散元模拟的一个重要环节。基于有限差分法(finite difference method,简称FDM)−离散元法(discrete element method,简称DEM)FDM-DEM耦合开展了柔性侧向边界条件下砂土三轴固结排水和不排水试验的数值模拟,并与相应的刚性侧向边界三轴数值试验进行了对比分析。结果表明:相比刚性侧向边界,基于FDM-DEM耦合的柔性侧向边界三轴试验能更好地再现室内砂土三轴试样的宏观力学响应和微观颗粒运动学特征;对于所模拟的砂土三轴固结排水试验,柔性侧向边界试样峰值强度后的应变软化和剪胀性明显弱于刚性侧向边界试样;对于所模拟的砂土三轴固结不排水试验,当轴向应变较大时,柔性侧向边界试样的偏应力小于刚性侧向边界试样,且产生绝对值较小的负孔压;三轴固结不排水试验中,当轴向应变较大时,柔性侧向边界对试样的约束和支撑作用弱于刚性侧向边界,其力链的稳定性较低,力链屈曲数较多,剪切带形成较早,故其各向异性和偏应力均较低。

关键词: 离散元, 砂土, 三轴固结不排水试验, 柔性侧向边界, FDM-DEM耦合, 力链

Abstract: Discrete element simulation of triaxial tests is an important tool for exploring the deformation and failure mechanisms of geotechnical materials such as sands. A crucial aspect of this simulation is the accurate representation of lateral boundaries. Using a coupled finite difference method (FDM)-discrete element method (DEM) approach, numerical simulations of consolidated-drained and consolidated-undrained triaxial tests were conducted under flexible lateral boundary conditions. These results were then compared with those of corresponding triaxial tests using rigid lateral boundaries. The results indicate that, compared to the rigid lateral boundary, the triaxial test using the FDM-DEM coupled flexible lateral boundary better captures both the macroscopic mechanical response and the microscopic particle kinematics of laboratory triaxial specimens. In the consolidated-drained triaxial tests, the strain softening and shear dilatancy of the specimen with the flexible lateral boundary are significantly weaker after reaching peak strength than those of the specimen with the rigid lateral boundary. In the consolidated-undrained triaxial tests, when the axial strain is large, the specimen with the flexible lateral boundary exhibits both a lower deviator stress and a smaller absolute value of negative excess pore pressure. Furthermore, in the consolidated-undrained triaxial tests, as the axial strain increases, the flexible lateral boundary provides weaker lateral constraint and support to the specimen compared to the rigid lateral boundary. Consequently, the stability of the force chains in the specimen with the flexible lateral boundary is lower, leading to more buckling events of force chains within the shear band. As a result, both the anisotropy and the deviator stress are reduced.

Key words: discrete element method (DEM), sand, consolidated-undrained triaxial tests, flexible lateral boundary, the coupled FDM-DEM, force chain

中图分类号: TU441
[1] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 周雨晴, 吕鑫龙, . 红层软岩崩解面释放率与崩解特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 285-296.
[2] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[3] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[4] 苗日成, 唐贝, 祁飞, 江志安, 崔溦, . 随机裂隙岩体滚刀破岩过程离散元模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 541-552.
[5] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[6] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[7] 孙闯, 蒲云波, 敖云鹤, 陶琦, . 冻融饱水裂隙砂岩力学特性及细观破裂演化特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2339-2352.
[8] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[9] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[10] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[11] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[12] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[13] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[14] 常建梅, 田世龙, 李翔, 冯怀平, KUVANDIK Lesov, . 不同形状废旧轮胎橡胶颗粒改良道砟动剪切性能及细观作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 721-728.
[15] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!