岩土力学 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1501-1510.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2024.1385CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2024.1385

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式的沟埋式涵洞竖向土压力

孙珊珊,贾世文,梁忠旭,刘墨林,张常光   

  1. 长安大学 建筑工程学院,陕西 西安 710061
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-07 接受日期:2025-02-17 出版日期:2025-05-06 发布日期:2025-05-06
  • 通讯作者: 张常光,男,1982年生,博士,教授,从事非饱和土与地下工程等研究。E-mail: zcg1016@163.com
  • 作者简介:孙珊珊,女,1986年生,博士,高级工程师,从事岩土力学及结构抗爆等研究。E-mail: sunjin1986123@163.com

Vertical earth pressure of a trench-buried culvert based on binomial distribution mode for backfill soil load transfers

SUN Shan-shan, JIA Shi-wen, LIANG Zhong-xu, LIU Mo-lin, ZHANG Chang-guang   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China
  • Received:2024-11-07 Accepted:2025-02-17 Online:2025-05-06 Published:2025-05-06

摘要: 为描述沟埋式涵洞的竖向土压力分布规律,借鉴筒仓散体材料竖向应力的分析方法,对沟槽填土进行分区并判定土拱方向。基于填土荷载传递二项式分布模式建立沟埋式涵洞的竖向土压力公式,继而结合荷载传递系数与等沉面高度的确定,给出所得公式的应用步骤,最后开展薄层厚度讨论、对比验证和影响因素分析。研究结果表明:所得涵洞竖向土压力公式简单实用,无需复杂积分运算,合理反映了土拱效应、填土分区、荷载传递和等沉面的共同影响,可设定统一的最大薄层厚度,并得到理论公式、模型试验和数值模拟的正确性验证;涵顶竖向土压力随着沟槽宽度、填土高度的增加而逐渐增大,且沿水平面为非均布,但填土内摩擦角增加时,涵顶竖向土压力与荷载传递系数呈反向变化;同时,等沉面高度也不是常数,选择不同情况下的涵洞竖向土压力公式时需比较填土高度与等沉面高度。

关键词: 沟埋式涵洞, 竖向土压力, 二项式分布模式, 土拱效应, 荷载传递系数

Abstract: To characterize the distribution law of vertical earth pressure for a trench-buried culvert, backfill soils were subdivided into distinct regions with varying effects of the soil arching direction, which referred to the analytical method of vertical stress for silo granular materials. The formula of vertical earth pressure for a trench-buried culvert was then presented based on the binomial distribution mode for backfill soil load transfers, and its application steps were outlined along with determining both the load transfer coefficient and the height of an equal settlement surface. Finally, discussions were carried out on the thin layer thickness, comparing verifications, and influencing factors. The results show that the proposed formula of vertical earth pressure with the maximum uniform thickness of thin layers is not only straightforward and practical without complex integrals, but also it reasonably accounts for comprehensive influences of soil arching, backfill soil partitions, load transfers, and an equal settlement surface. The validity of the proposed formula is demonstrated by comparing it with the theoretical formula, model tests, and numerical simulations. At the culvert top, the vertical earth pressure increases with increasing the trench width or the backfill soil height, and its distribution is not uniform on the horizontal plane. However, it changes in contrast to that of the load transfer coefficient, when the internal friction angle of backfill soils increases. In addition, the height of the equal settlement surface is not constant, and it should be evaluated against the backfill soil height to choose the proposed formula under different conditions.

Key words: trench-buried culvert, vertical earth pressure, binomial distribution mode, effect of soil arching, load transfer coefficient

中图分类号: TU 432
[1] 芮瑞, LIN A H, 杨俊超, 杨硕, . 被动活动门试验中的土拱效应演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1657-1666.
[2] 王洪涛, 刘容利, 赵晓东, 赵耀辉, 赵万里, . 钢管桩-灌注桩复合支护下桩间土拱力学效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1228-1239.
[3] 任一青, 陈保国, 任国卿, 杨振忠, 徐方. 涵顶-涵侧减载条件下高填方箱涵施工期受力特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[4] 姚嘉楠, 徐长节, 迟民良, 王艳萍, 习跃来, 王伟锋, 冯国辉, 孙佳政, . RBT模式下刚性挡墙非极限主动土压力的离散元模拟及理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 640-652.
[5] 陕耀, 董雅丞, 张旭辉, 姚西平, . 双层地下连续墙土压力的现场实测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 507-516.
[6] 王家全, 陈家明, 林志南, 唐毅, . 基于三角形滑移面的地基松动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 697-707.
[7] 钟卫, 张 帅, 贺拿. 基于相对变形方法的桩后土拱模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 315-326.
[8] 戴天毅, 肖世国, . 考虑路堤−加固区相互作用的刚性桩复合 地基沉降算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 479-489.
[9] 邓友生, 李令涛, 彭程谱, 李龙, 刘俊聪, 付云博. 静动荷载下桩网结构路基模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2149-2156.
[10] 黎春林. 盾构开挖面三维曲面体破坏模型 及支护力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2092-2102.
[11] 张恒志, 徐长节, 何寨兵, 黄展军, 何小辉, . 基于离散元方法的不同挡墙变位模式下有 限土体主动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 257-267.
[12] 朱晟, 张远, 加力别克·阿哈力别克, 喻建清, 何兆升, . 基于增量分析的堆石坝瞬变-流变参数联合反演[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1453-1461.
[13] 崔蓬勃, 朱永全, 刘勇, 朱正国, 潘英东, . 非饱和砂土隧道土拱效应模型试验 及颗粒流数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3451-3466.
[14] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[15] 庄妍, 李劭邦, 崔晓艳, 董晓强, 王康宇, . 高铁荷载下桩承式路基动力响应及土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!