岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 49-60.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0068CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0068

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究

陈树理1,郭伟1, 2,任宇晓1, 2,陈伟1   

  1. 1.天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072;2.天津大学 水利工程智能建设与运维全国重点实验室,天津,300350
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-17 接受日期:2025-04-10 出版日期:2026-01-11 发布日期:2026-01-07
  • 通讯作者: 郭伟,男,1982年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事软土地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: guow@tju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈树理,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土方面的科研工作。E-mail: 18710613962@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52171273,No.52108335);天津市科技计划项目(No.20JCJQJC00220);天津大学自主创新基金(No.2024XSU-0019)

Experimental study of stability of interlocking L-shaped caisson on soft soil interlayer ground

CHEN Shu-li1, GUO Wei1, 2, REN Yu-xiao1, 2, CHEN Wei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulic Engineering Intelligent Construction and Operation, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • Received:2025-01-17 Accepted:2025-04-10 Online:2026-01-11 Published:2026-01-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52171273, 52108335), the Tianjin Science and Technology Plan Project (20JCJQJC00220) and the Tianjin University Independent Innovation Fund (2024XSU-0019).

摘要: 互锁式L型沉箱作为一种新型沉箱结构,能够有效应对复杂海洋环境荷载。该结构在深水港码头、防波堤和人工岛等海洋基础设施中具有广阔的应用前景。通过室内加载模型试验,探究了所提出的互锁式L型沉箱(interlocking L-shaped caisson,简称ILC)替代传统L型沉箱(conventional L-shaped caisson,简称CLC)的可行性。研究了相邻ILC形成的六棱柱空腔内部的填充材料、地基类型和荷载形式对沉箱码头稳定性的影响。与CLC码头相比,在条形荷载下采用碎石或混凝土块联锁加固的ILC码头极限承载力分别提高了15.5%和20.1%。混凝土块联锁加固的ILC码头具有更优的承载性能。随着软土夹层地基替代砂土地基,ILC码头的极限承载力降低,其破坏模式由倾覆破坏变为整体失稳破坏,破坏面形态由直线-圆弧状变为多折线状。随着作用范围更小的集中荷载替代条形荷载,ILC码头的整体性变差,极限承载力显著降低,沉箱附近回填土表面沉降增大。

关键词: 海洋基础设施, 互锁式L型沉箱, 软土夹层地基, 模型试验, 稳定性

Abstract: The interlocking L-shaped caisson, as a new type of caisson structure, exhibits enhanced performance under complex marine loading conditions. This structure shows significant potential for applications in marine infrastructure, including deep-water port terminals, breakwaters, and artificial islands. The feasibility of replacing the conventional L-shaped caisson (CLC) with the proposed interlocking L-shaped caisson (ILC) is investigated through indoor loading model tests. The paper investigated the effects of filling materials, foundation types, and load forms on the stability of caisson docks formed by adjacent ILCs within a hexagonal prism cavity. Compared to CLC quay wall, the ultimate bearing capacity of the ILC quay wall, when pinned by gravel or concrete blocks, increased by 15.5% and 20.1% under strip load. The ILC quay wall with concrete block interlocking reinforcement exhibits superior load-bearing performance. When the sand ground is replaced with a soft soil interlayer ground, the ultimate bearing capacity of the ILC quay wall decreases. The ultimate failure mode of the ILC quay wall shifted from overturning to overall instability failure, with the failure surface changing from arcs and straight lines to multi-segmented lines. When strip loads are replaced by concentrated loads with a smaller range of action, the integrity of the ILC quay wall deteriorates, its ultimate bearing capacity significantly decreases, and the settlement of the backfill soil surface near the caisson increases.

Key words: ocean infrastructure, interlocking L-shaped caisson, soft soil interlayer ground, model test, stability

中图分类号: TU 447
[1] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[2] 何淼, 李霞颖, 李琦. 咸水层压缩CO2储能的关键地质力学问题及研究建议[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 437-469.
[3] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[4] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[5] 邓其宁, 崔玉龙, 王炯超, 郑俊, 许冲, . 三维边坡稳定性计算的ChatGPT辅助编程方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 322-334.
[6] 冯德銮, 余洋, 梁仕华. 碱激发地聚物固化滨海软土的强度和水稳定性研究进展与评述[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 13-39.
[7] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[8] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[9] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[10] 徐全, 侯靖, 杨剑, 杨昕光, 倪绍虎, 陈鑫. 基于合成岩体技术的岩质边坡稳定性精细化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2062-2070.
[11] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[12] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[13] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[14] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[15] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!