岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1171-1182.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0609CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0609

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

富水复合砂层突涌破坏行为及孔压响应特征试验研究

潘泓1,黄才穆1,骆冠勇1,彭斯格2,刘荣照1,曹洪1   

  1. 1.华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510640;2.广东工业大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-11 接受日期:2025-11-11 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 骆冠勇,男,1979年生,副教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: luogy@scut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:潘泓,男,1967年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: hpan@scut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51978282);广东省自然科学基金(No.2023A1515011571)

Experimental study on outburst failure behavior and pore pressure response characteristics of water-rich composite sand layers

PAN Hong1, HUANG Cai-mu1, LUO Guan-yong1, PENG Si-ge2, LIU Rong-zhao1, CAO Hong1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510640,China; 2. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China
  • Received:2025-06-11 Accepted:2025-11-11 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978282) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2023A1515011571).

摘要: 富水砂层中地下结构渗漏易引发砂水突涌灾害,其破坏行为与孔隙水压力密切相关,而现有研究多聚焦单一砂层,对复合砂层突涌全过程及孔隙水压力响应规律揭示不足。基于地铁施工事故背景,设计10组砂水突涌模型试验,采用实时孔隙水压力监测系统,探究“上细下粗”复合砂层侵蚀启动、发展及稳定过程,重点揭示突涌破坏中的孔压响应特征。结果表明:复合砂层突涌启动后孔隙水压力呈现骤降、持续低压及回升三阶段,孔压下降速率与幅度与破坏剧烈程度正相关;空腔拓展时,砂水流失速度大于上游水流补给,导致空腔内部出现负压,局部水头差大于总体水头差;在垂直于空腔表面方向上形成较大渗透力,诱发空腔表面发生砂沸现象,加剧空腔渗透破坏。试验揭示复合砂层中,下层粗砂与上层细砂构成串联结构,粗砂层作为强供水通道,使渗透力主要集中于上层细砂,导致复合砂层砂水流失持续时间更长、程度更剧烈、范围更大,其破坏风险明显高于单一砂层,建议工程中加强识别与监测。

关键词: 渗流, 突涌破坏, 复合砂层, 模型试验, 孔隙水压力

Abstract: Leakage from underground structures within water-rich sand layers readily triggers sand-water outburst disasters, with their destructive behavior closely linked to pore water pressure. Existing research predominantly focuses on single sand layers, leaving insufficient exploration of the entire outburst process and pore water pressure response patterns in composite sand layers. Drawing upon the context of metro construction accidents, this study designed ten sand-water outburst model tests. Employing a real-time pore water pressure monitoring system, it investigated the initiation, development, and stabilization processes of erosion within a “fine-grained upper layer, coarse-grained lower layer” composite sand formation, with particular emphasis on revealing the pore pressure response characteristics during outburst failure. Results indicate that following outburst initiation in composite sand formations, pore water pressure undergoes three distinct phases: a sudden drop, sustained low pressure, and subsequent recovery. The rate and magnitude of pore pressure decline correlate positively with the severity of failure. During cavity expansion, the rate of sand-water loss exceeds upstream water replenishment, inducing negative pressure within the cavity where local head differences exceed overall head differences. Significant permeating forces develop perpendicular to the cavity surface, triggering sand boiling phenomena that exacerbate permeation failure. Experiments reveal that within composite sand layers, the lower coarse sand and upper fine sand form a series structure. The coarse sand layer acts as a strong water supply conduit, concentrating permeation forces primarily on the upper fine sand. This results in longer duration, more severe extent, and broader scope of sand and water loss within composite layers compared to single-layer formations, presenting significantly higher failure risks. Enhanced identification and monitoring are recommended for engineering applications.

Key words: seepage, outburst failure, composite sand layer, model test, pore water pressure

中图分类号: TU 46+2
[1] 张昕, 张茹梦, 刘晨, 刘思宇, 郭博文. 循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1147-1159.
[2] 刘红帅, 丁泊文, 宋东松, 李羿, 王永志. 柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[3] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[4] 王志良, 肖智桓, 申林方, 李邵军. 基于物理信息神经网络岩石裂隙渗流传热耦合作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 703-716.
[5] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[6] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[7] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[8] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[9] 董林, 陈强, 夏坤, 李彦苍, 李燕, 王晓磊. 细粒土黏性对液化与循环软化特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 228-237.
[10] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[11] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[12] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[13] 王昕琪, 冯子军, 陈正男, 高祺, 阴伟涛, 靳佩桦, 李玉彬, . 超临界水作用下花岗岩裂隙渗流特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2847-2858.
[14] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[15] 吴兵, 盛建龙, 叶祖洋, 周新, . 单裂隙岩体非线性渗流-法向应力耦合模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2495-2504.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!