岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 359-372.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0770CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0770

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 •    下一篇

压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律

孙冠华1, 2,耿璇1, 2,姜长飞3,石露1, 2,张金涛4, 5, 江巍4, 5   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国大唐集团有限公司宁夏分公司,宁夏 银川 750016;4. 三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌443002; 5. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-22 接受日期:2025-11-11 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 耿璇,女,2000年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下内衬硐库岩体稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail: gengxuan22@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:孙冠华,男,1982年生,博士,研究员,主要从事地质储能、计算岩石力学等方面的研究工作。E-mail: ghsun@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42572366,No. 12302507,No. 52508463);中国五矿集团有限公司科技专项计划“揭榜挂帅”项目(No. 2025ZXA04)

Analytical model and evolution law of the surrounding rock failure zone in lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage power stations

SUN Guan-hua1, 2, GENG Xuan1, 2, JIANG Chang-fei3, SHI Lu1, 2, ZHANG Jin-tao4, 5, JIANG Wei4, 5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. China Datang Corporation Ltd. Ningxia Branch, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750016, China; 4. College of Civil Engineering & Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 5. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2025-07-22 Accepted:2025-11-11 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42572366, 12302507, 52508463) and the Science and Technology Special Program “Open Bidding for Selecting the Best Candidates” Project of China Minmetals Corporation (2025ZXA04).

摘要: 压缩空气储能地下内衬硐库在运行时围岩面临多种复杂破坏模式,尤其在高压工况下易诱发拉伸与剪切破坏,严重威胁结构稳定性与运行安全。围绕双破坏机制耦合特征,建立了从开挖至运行全过程应力路径的围岩破坏区解析模型,分析了岩体等级、埋深、抗拉强度及地应力不等向性对破坏区演化规律的影响。研究结果表明,运行阶段的破坏模式受开挖后围岩初始力学状态调控:开挖后仍处于弹性状态的优质岩体,运行期可能同时发生高压拉伸与剪切破坏;而开挖后已形成剪切破坏区的较差岩体,运行期仅表现为该破坏区的扩展。当开挖破坏区小于高压破坏区时,增加埋深可有效抑制高压拉伸与剪切破坏区的扩展。高压拉伸破坏的发生会增加围岩整体破坏程度,但岩体仅需具备较低的抗拉强度便能抑制拉伸破坏区的发生,且其临界抗拉强度数值随埋深增加而降低。地应力不等向性会促使围岩在不同方向上形成多种类型的破坏区,随着不等向性增强,高压破坏发生的临界内压降低,抑制拉伸破坏所需的抗拉强度数值升高。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 内衬硐库, 岩体响应, 解析模型, 破坏区

Abstract: Compressed air energy storage lined rock caverns are subject to various complex failure modes during operation, particularly under high-pressure conditions, where tensile and shear failures are prone to occur, posing serious threats to structural stability and operational safety. Focusing on the coupling characteristics of failure mechanisms, an analytical model of the surrounding rock failure zone was developed based on the full stress path from excavation to operation. The influences of rock mass quality, burial depth, tensile strength, and in-situ stress anisotropy on the evolution of failure zones were systematically analyzed. The results indicate that the failure mode during operation is significantly affected by the initial state of the surrounding rock after excavation: for high-quality rock masses that remain elastic after excavation, both high-pressure tensile and shear failures may occur during operation; whereas for lower-quality rock masses where shear failure zones have already developed after excavation, only further shear zone expansion is observed during operation. When the excavation-induced failure zone is smaller than the high-pressure failure zone, increasing burial depth effectively suppresses the expansion of both tensile and shear failure zones. The occurrence of tensile failure under high pressure significantly increases the overall degree of surrounding rock failure. However, relatively low tensile strength can inhibit its initiation. The critical tensile strength required for suppression decreases with increasing burial depth. In-situ stress anisotropy generates direction-dependent. As anisotropy increases, the critical internal pressure for high-pressure failure decreases, whereas the tensile strength required to suppress tensile failure increases.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, lined rock cavern, rock mass responses, analytical model, failure zones

中图分类号: TU 456
[1] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[2] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[3] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[4] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[5] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[6] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[7] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[8] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[9] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[10] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[11] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[12] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[13] 吴嘉园, 王华宁, 宋飞, 胡韬, 蒋明镜, . 考虑能源土软化特性及钻采全过程的井壁稳定半解析模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2121-2134.
[14] 孙冠华, 王娇, 于显杨, 易琪, 朱开源, 王章星, 耿璇, 屈杰, . 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库基本原理与分析方法研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 1-25.
[15] 贾宁, 刘顺, 王洪播. 压缩空气储能人工硐库热力耦合解析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2263-2278.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!