岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 373-382.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0815CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0815

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究

黄浚鸣1,赵向阳1,马洪岭2,王磊1,张佳敏1   

  1. 1. 中石化石油工程技术研究院有限公司 深层地热富集机理与高效开发全国重点实验室,北京 102206; 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程安全全国重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-30 接受日期:2025-11-13 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 作者简介:黄浚鸣,男,1996年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事能源岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: wongtsunming1996@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国石化科技部项目(No. P25006)

Feasibility analysis of the comprehensive utilization of coupling salt cavern CAES and insoluble sediment thermal storage

WONG Tsun-ming1, ZHAO Xiang-yang1, MA Hong-ling2, WANG Lei1, ZHANG Jia-min1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Deep Geothermal Resources, Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 102206, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2025-07-30 Accepted:2025-11-13 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Sinopec Science and Technology Department Project (P25006).

摘要: 层状夹层盐岩腔体含有大量不溶沉渣,而当前缺乏系统利用沉渣储热能力的分析。因此,为探索耦合盐穴压缩空气储能与沉渣储热的可行性,基于Comsol Multiphysics平台构建了考虑沉渣多孔介质特性的热--固数值模型。首先,研究了不同沉渣含量下腔体在常规压缩空气储能工况下的热力响应,发现沉渣比热容降低了热空气对腔壁的热冲击;沉渣层垂直厚度超过30 m时可降低围岩温度波动,采气阶段温度波动小于0.5 ℃,注气阶段温度波动小于1 ℃。然后,构建了具有连通道的水平双腔模型,研究了储热工况下的温度场变化。储热模拟显示在运行过程中流出界面温度波动为[45 ℃, 55 ℃],相比注入界面温度波动[30 ℃, 60 ℃]降低了66%;并且在3个注采周期后,研究发现沉渣温度在[49 ℃, 53 ℃]区间内周期变化,验证了将沉渣作为压缩空气储能系统地下储热模块的可行性。结果表明,沉渣热容量有助于洞壁稳定性,为在富含沉渣盐穴中开发压缩空气-储热综合利用系统提供参考。

关键词: 压缩空气储能, 盐穴, 储热, 多孔介质, 数值模拟

Abstract:

The cavern constructed in the layered inter-bedded salt rock contains significant insoluble sediment, whose heat storage and utilization potential remains underexplored. To investigate the feasibility of integrating compressed gas energy storage in salt caverns with heat storage in the sediment, a thermo-hydro-mechanical numerical model was developed using Comsol Multiphysics, accounting for the porous medium characteristics of the sediment layer. Firstly, the thermal response of the cavern was analyzed under varying sediment contents during conventional compressed gas storage. The specific heat capacity of the sediment was found to mitigate the thermal impact of hot air on the cavern wall. Temperature fluctuations in the surrounding rock decreased when the sediment layer’s vertical thickness exceeded 30 m. During the gas production stage, temperature fluctuations were restricted to below 0.5 ℃, while during the gas injection stage, they were less than 1 ℃. Subsequently, a dual-cavern model with connected channels was constructed to study the temperature field changes under short-term heat storage, respectively. Simulations showed that temperature fluctuations at the outflow interface during operation ranged from 45 ℃ to 55 ℃, which is 66% lower than at the injection interface, ranging from 30 ℃ to 60 ℃. After three operation cycles, sediment temperature was observed to vary periodically between 49 ℃ and 53 ℃, validating the feasibility of using sediment as an underground heat storage module for compressed air energy storage systems. Results demonstrate that the sediment’s heat capacity contributes to cave wall stability and offers a reference for developing a comprehensive system for utilizing compressed air and heat energy storage in sediment-filled salt caverns.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, salt cavern, thermal storage, porous media, numerical modeling

中图分类号: TU 93
[1] 孙冠华, 耿璇, 姜长飞, 石露, 张金涛, 江巍. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬硐库围岩破坏区解析模型及演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 359-372.
[2] 张国华, 相月, 张世殊, 王薪锦, 郭辉, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能硐库运行全过程围岩弹塑性变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 383-401.
[3] 葛鑫博, 黄俊, 赵同彬, 陶刚, 马洪岭, 王威. 人工智能在压缩空气储能地下工程中的应用综述[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 413-425.
[4] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[5] 程昊德, 贾宁, 刘顺, 聂会建, 梁昊. 压缩空气储能人工硐库多层密封结构热传递算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 470-484.
[6] 张桂民, 孙文卿, 朱泽凡, 苏永康, 朱旭聪. 施工缝隙对压气储能硐室钢衬受力的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 485-496.
[7] 孙冠华, 王章星, 王娇, 董沂鑫, 石露, 刘治军, 林姗. 基于FDEM的地下内衬硐库密封结构-衬砌分缝协同优化设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 497-514.
[8] 张国华, 郭辉, 张世殊, 周芝仪, 相月, 熊峰, 华东杰. 压缩空气储能地下储气库椭圆形断面最佳轴比及运行压力区间确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 515-529.
[9] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[10] 刘顺, 程昊德, 贾宁, 王洪播, 尹宏磊. 压缩空气储能隧道式地下内衬硐库的伯努利管温控方案研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 539-548.
[11] 胡港, 芮瑞, 江强强, 王永平, 张文涛. 压缩空气储能隧道式硬岩储气硐起裂角与起裂压力二维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 549-561.
[12] 谢传金, 罗红梅, 白冰, 李继岩, 杨横涛, 郑文召. 含水层压缩空气储能空间封闭性评价:理论与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 562-570.
[13] 王志良, 肖智桓, 申林方, 李邵军. 基于物理信息神经网络岩石裂隙渗流传热耦合作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 703-716.
[14] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[15] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!