岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1301-1312.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0316CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0316

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于能量耗散与量纲分析的砂土潜蚀速率模型

夏雨1, 2,陈勇1, 2,王力1, 2,江巍1, 2,CHAN Dave2, 3   

  1. 1.三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2.三峡大学 土木与建筑学院,湖北 宜昌 443002; 3.阿尔伯塔大学 土木与环境工程学院,加拿大 埃德蒙顿 T6G 2H5
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-28 接受日期:2025-06-25 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 通讯作者: 陈勇,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土-水耦合作用机制及边坡稳定性评价研究。E-mail: cyonger@126.com
  • 作者简介:夏雨,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事粒状土渗透稳定性方面的研究。E-mail: rain@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42272317,No. U21A2031)。

A suffusion rate model of sandy soil based on energy dissipation and dimensional analysis

XIA Yu1, 2, CHEN Yong1, 2, WANG Li1, 2, JIANG Wei1, 2, CHAN Dave2, 3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering & Architecture, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2H5, Canada
  • Received:2025-03-28 Accepted:2025-06-25 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42272317, U21A2031).

摘要: 潜蚀作为引起内部不稳定砂土中可动细颗粒沿孔隙通道迁移并流失的现象,是不良级配地质体或堤坝等岩土结构渗透破坏的主要诱因之一。然而,现有描述潜蚀发展过程的速率模型仍普遍存在经验依赖性强、模型参数可测性差以及参数物理意义不明确等局限性。基于此,首先从潜蚀的细观机制以及能量耗散视角出发,阐释了砂土中可流失细颗粒总量存在有限性的成因,并将潜蚀界定为细颗粒在土体中机械做功引发的能量耗散过程;随后通过分析潜蚀过程的内在机制和能量转换过程,提出了一个恒定水力梯度下的砂土潜蚀速率模型;同时引入最大累积流失率和侵蚀系数作为模型的关键参数,将其表示为试验条件、土性特征等关键因素的函数,并分别基于能量耗散原理和量纲分析进行确定和校准;最后采用已发表文献的试验数据集验证了模型的有效性。结果表明:所提出的砂土潜蚀速率模型可反映细颗粒流失总量的有限性和潜蚀速率的衰减特性,基于一套参数即可较好地描述同一类型土样在不同恒定水力梯度下的细颗粒流失过程。模型的构建深化了对砂土潜蚀内在机制的认识,为潜蚀过程的定量分析提供了理论基础。

关键词: 砂土潜蚀, 机械做功, 能量耗散, 潜蚀速率模型, 量纲分析

Abstract: Suffusion, a phenomenon involving the migration and loss of movable fine particles through pore channels in internally unstable sandy soil, is one of the primary triggers of seepage failure in poorly-graded geological bodies or geotechnical structures such as dams. However, existing models of suffusion rate often suffer from limitations such as strong empirical dependence, poor parameter measurability, and unclear physical significance. To address these issues, this study explains why the total amount of erodible fine particles in sandy soil remains finite, from the perspectives of suffusion meso-mechanisms and energy dissipation. Suffusion is defined as an energy dissipation process induced by the mechanical work performed by fine particles within the soil matrix. Subsequently, through analysis of the intrinsic mechanisms and energy conversion during suffusion, a suffusion rate model for sandy soil under constant hydraulic gradient is proposed. The model introduces the maximum cumulative loss ratio and the erosion coefficient as key parameters. These parameters are expressed as functions of critical factors such as experimental conditions and soil characteristics, which are determined and calibrated based on the energy dissipation principle and dimensional analysis, respectively. Finally, the model’s validity is verified using experimental datasets from published literature. The results demonstrate that the proposed suffusion rate model for sandy soil effectively captures both the finite total loss of fine particles and the decay characteristics of the suffusion rate. Utilizing a single set of parameters, the model successfully describes the fine particle loss process for the same soil type under different constant hydraulic gradients. The development of this model enhances the understanding of the intrinsic mechanisms governing suffusion in sandy soil and establishes a theoretical basis for the quantitative analysis of suffusion processes.

Key words: suffusion of sandy soil, mechanical work, energy dissipation, suffusion rate model, dimensional analysis

中图分类号: TU 411.4
[1] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[2] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[3] 郑可跃, 施成华, 娄义黎, 贾朝军, 雷明锋, 杨益, . 深部高地应力隧道开挖卸荷围岩能量计算方法及演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 165-177.
[4] 王磊, 杨震宇, 陈礼鹏, 王勇, 张帅, 王安铖, 李伟利, . 不同超临界CO2浸蚀时间后冲击煤体能量演化与破坏特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2251-2262.
[5] 王智德, 钱梦凡, 李杰, 司莹莹, 江俐敏, . 高应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1917-1928.
[6] 贾鹏, 郤保平, 李晓科, 解瑾, 蔡佳豪, 高鹏利, . 花岗岩非稳态传热破坏过程能量演变规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(10): 3013-3023.
[7] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[8] 王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[9] 赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.
[10] 侯永强, 尹升华, 杨世兴, 张敏哲, 刘洪斌, . 动态荷载下胶结充填体力学响应及能量 损伤演化过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 145-156.
[11] 王爱文, 高乾书, 潘一山, . 煤层钻孔降倾-控变-耗能防冲机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1230-1244.
[12] 马秋峰, 刘志河, 秦跃平, 田静, 王树立, . 基于能量耗散理论的岩石塑性-损伤本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1210-1220.
[13] 熊仲明, 吕世鸿, 李运良, 赵奇峰, 李进, 谭书舜, 张向荣, 朱玉荣, 姜磊, 杨琪凡, 张宁波, 张子栋. 被动围压下黄土动态力学性能与能量耗散研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 775-782.
[14] 林澜, 李飒, 孙立强, 刘小龙, 陈文炜, . 基于动力触探的钙质土相对密实度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2730-2738.
[15] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!