岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1313-1322.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0380CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0380

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥浆介质饱和下松散堆积体抗剪强度特性试验研究

王家辉1,江洎洧2,孙逸飞3,王培清4,王保田1,陈亮1,周钺4,李超4   

  1. 1.河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210003;2.长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430010; 3.太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原 030024;4.西藏农牧大学 西藏土木水利电力工程技术研究中心,西藏 林芝 860000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-13 接受日期:2025-07-08 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-16
  • 作者简介:王家辉,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事松散土石体的试验及数值仿真研究。E-mail: h130719203@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51979009)。

Experiment study on shear strength characteristics of loose deposits saturated with mud

WANG Jia-hui1, JIANG Ji-wei2, SUN Yi-fei3, WANG Pei-qing4, WANG Bao-tian1, CHEN Liang1, ZHOU Yue4, LI Chao4   

  1. 1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210003, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan, Hubei 430010, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 4. Research Center of Civil, Hydraulic and Power Engineering of Xizang, Xizang Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi, Xizang 860000, China
  • Received:2025-04-13 Accepted:2025-07-08 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979009).

摘要:

松散堆积体在自然界中广泛存在,具有结构松散、孔隙大、透水性强等特点,在降雨作用下容易失稳破坏,诱发泥石流等灾害。雨水入渗后与堆积体中的细颗粒物质结合,形成不同含水率泥浆,而不仅仅是水这种液相介质。为了深入了解松散堆积体在不同含水率泥浆饱和下抗剪强度变化规律,以崩滑松散堆积体为研究对象,通过自主研发的可进行饱和条件下剪切的大型剪切试验仪,首次开展不同泥水介质饱和下松散堆积体的大型剪切试验,得出以下主要结论:(1)该试验研究松散堆积体在保证自身稳定存在前提下且能够体现其松散特性的相对密实度Dr区间为0.350.45Dr0.35,则其在自重作用下重新固结产生较大沉降而导致相对密实度增加,不再是原来的相对密实度;Dr0.45,则无法体现其松散特性。(2)泥浆的性质与含水率密切相关,随着泥浆含水率的增加,泥浆胶结作用变弱,润滑作用变强。泥浆含水率小于66.6%,无法形成流动性泥浆,若泥浆含水率大于90.9%,其流动性接近于水。(3)泥浆对松散堆积的抗剪强度具有弱化作用,内摩擦角φ 和黏聚力随着泥浆含水率的增加都降低,越是松散的堆积体,泥浆的弱化作用越显著,越容易发生失稳破坏。泥浆的弱化作用可以初步揭示松散堆积体在短时强降雨后发生失稳破坏的机制。

关键词: 松散堆积体, 剪切试验, 抗剪强度, 相对密实度, 泥浆介质, 降雨

Abstract:

Loose deposits are extensively distributed in natural environments and are frequently destabilized by external disturbances such as rainfall, which can trigger debris flow disasters. During rainfall, fine particles in the loose deposits combines with rainwater, forming a mud that induces instability. In order to investigation the change of shear strength, large-scale shear tests of loose deposits saturated with different water contents of mud are conducted for the first time by a self-developed large-scale shear testing apparatus capable of conducting shear tests under saturated conditions. There are some findings. (1) Relative density range of loose deposits is 0.35–0.45. Below a relative density of 0.35, loose deposits tend to settle under gravity, leading to an increase in relative density. Conversely, above 0.45, the deposits no longer exhibit loose characteristics. (2) Mud properties correlate with water content. As mud water content increases, cementation weakens and lubrication strengthens. The minimum water content required to form mobile mud is 66.6%. Below this threshold, the mud loses its fluidity. At 90.9% water content, the mud’s fluidity approaches that of water. (3) Mud weakens the shear strength of loose deposits. As mud water content increases, the internal friction angle (φ) and cohesion (c) of loose deposits decrease. The looser the deposits, the greater the weakening effect of the mud, and the more prone they are to instability. The variation in shear strength of loose deposits saturated with different water contents of mud explains the mechanism of debris flow after short-term heavy rainfall.

Key words: loose deposit, shear test, shear strength, relative density, mud medium, rainfall

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 宋林辉, 张静轩, 郭易龙, 杨天娇, 李志明, 梅国雄. 裂隙岩层中的地铁车站基底孔压实测与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1364-1372.
[2] 蒋水华, 葛成民, 元志镕, 向晖, 胡伟, 黄发明. 基于等效渗透系数的多层土坡降雨入渗模型及可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1417-1430.
[3] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[4] 黄叶宁, 邓华锋, 孔纲强, 李建林, 朱作祥, 周书桓, 李冠野. 考虑粗糙度影响的土-岩接触面剪切力学模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 731-742.
[5] 韩爽, 谈云志, 杨舒涵, 明华军, 吴军, 王冲. 膨胀珍珠岩增强固化淤泥土强度的火山灰活性效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 130-139.
[6] 刘静, 王昊, 杨鑫, 苏进臣, 张友良, . 微生物诱导碳酸钙沉淀加固热带土质边坡现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 343-353.
[7] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[8] 方薇, 吴润丰, 周春梅, . 基于包络壳模型的非饱和土朗肯被动土压力[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2885-2893.
[9] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
[10] 骆祚森, 曹旭, 邓华锋, 杨旺, 李建林, 杨超, . 法向动载对不同含水状态灰岩节理面剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1799-1810.
[11] 欧阳淼, 张红日, 王桂尧, 邓人睿, 郭鸥, 汪磊, 高游, . 基于响应面法的生物基质改良膨胀土配比优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1368-1378.
[12] 高品红, 高晨博, 彭成威, 刘飞禹, . 降雨作用下花岗岩残积土边坡模型试验及离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1632-1642.
[13] 宋享桦, 肖衡林, 倪化勇, 谭勇, . 降雨作用下砂土边坡失稳破坏触发机制宏细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 969-979.
[14] 元志镕, 蒋水华, 常志璐, 向晖, 刘玉伟, 黄劲松, . 考虑初始含水率非均匀分布及孔隙水重分布的边坡可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1001-1012.
[15] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!