Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12): 3249-3259.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1598

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Model test on earth pressure at rest of light weight soil mixed with EPS particles behind a retaining wall

HOU Tian-shun, YANG Kai-xuan   

  1. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • Received:2020-10-26 Revised:2021-01-24 Online:2021-12-13 Published:2021-12-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51509211), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2016M602863), the Excellent Science and Technology Activities Foundation for Returned Overseas Teachers of Shaanxi Province(2018031), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province(2017BSHYDZZ50) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2452020169).

Abstract: To determine the earth pressure at rest of light weight soil mixed with expandable polystyrene(EPS) particles behind a retaining wall, the model tests are conducted for remolded soil and light weight soil respectively. The distribution laws of earth pressure at rest, coefficient of earth pressure at rest and vertical settlement deformation of the filler behind retaining wall are explored under loading and unloading processes, and the mechanisms of pressure reduction and settlement deformation of light weight soil are clarified. The results show that the vertical earth pressure and lateral earth pressure of remolded soil and light weight soil increase linearly with the increasing of filling depth before loading and unloading, and the relative errors between theoretical values and measured values for vertical earth pressure and lateral earth pressure are no more than 26.35%. The effect of load on vertical earth pressure and lateral earth pressure decreases with the increase of filling depth for remolded soil. After curing, light weight soil has self-supporting property, thus the influencing depth of load on light weight soil is limited. In this test, the load influencing area depth of light weight soil is about 50% of the wall height. In the process of loading and unloading, when the filling depth is less than 50% of the wall height, the vertical earth pressures and lateral earth pressures of light weight soil increase or decrease obviously with the gradual load increasing or decreasing. When the filling depth is greater than 50% of the wall height, the vertical earth pressures and lateral earth pressures gradually converge with the gradual load increasing or decreasing, but the change range is smaller. The measured coefficients of earth pressure at rest of remolded soil and light weight soil are non-linear distribution behind the retaining wall, which are in the range of 0.27?0.74 and 0.33?0.44, respectively. The theoretical values of the coefficient of earth pressure at rest calculated by Jaky formula are basically larger than the measured values, but the difference is smaller. The vertical settlement deformation of remolded soil decreases with the increasing of filling depth, which is approximately 0?21.5 mm. The vertical settlement of light weight soil after curing has no obvious change under load, which is approximately 0?2.8 mm. Compared with remolded soil, light weight soil after curing has good buffering and self-supporting capacity, which can more effectively absorb and disperse the vertical pressure, due to the buffering effect of EPS particles and the solidification effect of cement. Light weight soil can greatly reduce the earth pressure at rest, the coefficient of earth pressure at rest and vertical settlement deformation, and meet the requirements of filling load reduction in retaining wall engineering.

Key words: light weight soil, retaining wall, earth pressure at rest, coefficient of earth pressure at rest, model test

CLC Number: 

  • TU413
[1] PAN Shen-xin, JIANG Guan-lu, YUAN Sheng-yang, LIU Xian-feng, HE Zi-lei, CAO Li-jun, ZHOU Shi-guang, . Service performance of reinforced soil retaining wall with integral rigid facing of high-speed railway under seismic action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(S1): 519-530.
[2] LAI Zhi-qiang, BAI Sheng-yuan, CHEN Lin, ZOU Wei-lie, XU Shu-ling, ZHAO Lian-jun, . Experimental study of dewatering characteristics of ring-type tube stockyard sludge storage [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[3] HUANG Da-wei, LU Wen-jian, LUO Wen-jun, YU Jue, . An experimental study on the influence of synchronous grouting during shield tunnel construction on vertical displacement and surrounding earth pressure in sandy soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[4] SONG Wei-tao, ZHANG Pei, DU Xiu-li, LIN Qing-tao, . Influence of soil property on ground response during construction of shallow shield tunnel [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] YANG Bai, QIN Chao, ZHANG Yin-hai, WANG Wei, XIAO Shi-guo, . Model tests on bearing characteristics of pile with high rock-socketed ratio above an underlying karst cave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[6] SHI Zhan, ZHANG Tie-jun, LI Mei-xiang, TAO Si-ji, BO Yin, LI Yun-bo, . Model test of horizontal freezing reinforcement in mud tank of slurry balanced shield [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[7] CHAI Hong-tao, WEN Song-lin, . Centrifugal model test on characteristics of pile foundation bearing capacity failure envelope curve under combined loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
[8] REN Yi-qing, CHEN Bao-guo, REN Guo-qing, YANG Zhen-zhong, XU Fang. Stress characteristics of high-fill box culvert with soft layers placed on the top and sidewall during construction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1153-1162.
[9] PEI Yuan-yuan, LONG Jian-hui, GUO Shi-yi, AN Cheng-ji, WENG Hang-yu, ZHANG Ji-ning, . Model test study on stress-strain characteristics of angled reinforced soil retaining wall under different loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(2): 539-550.
[10] WANG Bing, HU Xiao-bo, KONG Nan-nan. Experimental study on vacuum combined with electro-osmosis for reinforcing ultrafine particle dredged soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3523-3533.
[11] LIU Wen-jing, DENG Hui, ZHOU Xin. Dynamic response of high steep rock slope with a double-layer ductile shear zone under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[12] CHEN Huai-lin, YANG Tao, RAO Yun-kang, ZHANG Zhe, WU Hong-gang, XIE Jiang-wei, TENG Han-qing. Calculation method of sliding surface stress based on segmented sliding surface stress measurement system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3562-3573.
[13] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[14] LEI Hua-yang, YANG Yang, XU Ying-gang, . Experimental study on stratum disturbance of shield construction under different tunnel depth conditions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 1-12.
[15] LIU Zhi-chun, MA Bo, HU Zhi-nan, ZHANG Zhen-bo, DU Kong-ze, . Experimental study on distribution pattern of active earth pressure of foundation pit adjacent to an underground structure [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 33-41.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!