›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 561-568.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.02.036

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

煤柱下底板偏应力区域特征及案例

许 磊1,魏海霞1,肖祯雁1,李博2   

  1. 1.河南理工大学 土木工程学院,河南 焦作 454000;2.贵州大学 喀斯特环境与地质灾害防治教育部重点实验室,贵州 贵阳 550000
  • 收稿日期:2013-10-01 出版日期:2015-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:许磊,男,1980年生,博士,主要从事巷道支护的相关研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    河南理工大学博士基金(No. B2015-70);河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目(No. 12B560007);贵州省科技厅基金(黔科合LH字[2014]7617)。

Engineering cases and characteristics of deviatoric stress under coal pillar in regional floor

XU Lei1, WEI Hai-xia1, XIAO Zhen-yan1, LI Bo2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Hennan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Karst Environment and Geohazard Prevention, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou 550000, China
  • Received:2013-10-01 Online:2015-02-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 选取某煤矿近距离煤层为工程背景,采用FLAC3D模拟了8#煤层残余煤柱底板偏应力场分布特征。结果表明:(1)底板的偏应力呈扩散状向底板传递,距离煤柱越远扩散范围越广,煤柱边缘偏应力呈45°向底板传播;(2)煤柱较窄时,中线和边缘处偏应力影响深度浅,随煤柱宽度增加,底板偏应力变化和影响深度较大,当煤柱宽度足够大时,影响深度又变浅,中部趋于原岩应力;(3)同一水平面上,偏应力呈马鞍状分布,随煤柱宽度增加,煤柱中线处和边缘处偏应力经历了先增大后减小的过程,煤柱边缘处偏应力峰值位置变化不大;(4)同一煤柱宽度,煤柱边缘偏应力峰值向深部递减且趋势减慢,同时,峰值远离煤柱且趋势加快。在自由边界受均布载荷、底板垂直应力、水平应力、切应力解析解的基础上,推导了底板偏应力解析公式,解析与模拟结果基本吻合。具体到该工程的地质条件,9205轨道巷距离煤柱边缘20 m、9205回风巷在煤柱边缘、9205运输巷在煤柱中线处,9205轨道巷维护效果最好,证明了内错式巷道且距离煤柱足够远时,偏应力较小,宏观应力环境更适合巷道围岩自稳。

关键词: 煤柱, 底板, 均布载荷, 偏应力

Abstract: A close distance coal seams in a coal mine is selected as a case. Deviatoric stress distribution under coal abandon pillars #8 is simulated with FLAC3D. Research results are as follows: (1) Deviatoric stress field in floor distributes as diffusion, the farther the distance is, the wider the range spreads; it transfers from border to floor in 45o direction; (2) When the width of pillar is narrow, the deviatoric stress influence depth at midline and border is shallow; with the width increasing; deviatoric stress at floor varies obviously and the influence depth is deeper; when the coal pillar width is wide enough, middle part is as stress of primary rock; (3) In the same horizontal plane, deviatoric stresses are distributed as saddle shape, with pillar width increasing, the pillar midline and border increase at first and then decrease; and the position of deviatoric stress peak at coal pillar border has little change; (4) as to a certain coal pillar width, deviatoric stress peak at border decreases in vertical direction and its tendency is slower; meanwhile, the peak is far away from coal pillar quickly and its tendency gets faster. Through vertical stress, horizontal stress and shear stress analytical solution, a floor deviatoric stress analytic formula is derived; the analytic solution is consistent with the simulated result. In this case, track roadway 9205 has a 20 m distance from coal pillar border (inboard-type); return airway 9205 is located in coal pillar border; transportation roadway 9205 is located in coal pillar midline, track roadway 9205 maintenance effect is the best of them, which proves that the inboard-type layout roadway with an enough distance from coal pillar bears a little deviatoric stress. Macrostress field is more suitable to the roadway surrounding rock self-stabilization.

Key words: coal pillar, floor, uniform load, deviatoric stress

中图分类号: 

  • TD 822+.3
[1] 宋文成, 梁正召, . 承压水上开采倾斜底板破坏特征 与突水危险性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 624-634.
[2] 鲁海峰, 孟祥帅, 颜伟, 姚多喜, . 采煤工作面层状结构底板采动稳定及 破坏深度的圆弧滑动解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 166-174.
[3] 王瑞, 闫帅, 柏建彪, 常治国, 宋远霸, . 端帮开采下煤柱破坏宽度计算及失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3167-3180.
[4] 朱斯陶, 姜福兴, 朱海洲, 张俊杰, 连鸿全, 韩国庆, . 高应力区掘进工作面冲击地压事故发生机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 337-343.
[5] 马 凯,尹立明,陈军涛,陈 明,王自起,崔博强,. 深部开采底板隔水关键层受局部高承压水作用破坏理论分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3213-3222.
[6] 刘 畅,张俊文,杨增强,弓培林,王 开,张小强,李玉琳,. 工作面过空巷基本顶超前破断机制及控制技术[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1411-1421.
[7] 张 明,姜福兴,李家卓,焦振华,胡 浩,舒凑先,高化军,. 基于巨厚岩层-煤柱协同变形的煤柱稳定性[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 705-714.
[8] 李春元,张 勇,彭 帅,高守阳,马亚仲,. 深部开采底板岩体卸荷损伤的强扰动危险性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3957-3968.
[9] 何满潮,高玉兵,杨 军,王建文,王亚军,朱 珍, . 厚煤层快速回采切顶卸压无煤柱自成巷工程试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 254-264.
[10] 黄琪嵩,程久龙, . 软硬互层岩体采场底板的应力分布及破坏特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 36-42.
[11] 杨爱武,孔令伟,郭 飞,. 天津滨海软黏土动力累积塑性变形特性与增长模型[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 979-984.
[12] 何 团,毛德兵,黄志增,孙晓冬,张学亮, . 特厚煤层区段防水煤柱稳定性评价及保护技术研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1148-1153.
[13] 朱光丽,张文泉,张贵彬,王树立,. 采动诱发断层活化导水试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3163-3172.
[14] 王 琦,樊运平,李 刚,郭文孝,闫殿华,张立平,. 厚煤层综放双巷工作面巷间煤柱尺寸研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3009-3016.
[15] 臧 濛,孔令伟,郭爱国. 静偏应力下湛江结构性黏土的动力特性[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 33-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[2] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[3] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[4] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[5] 谷拴成,苏培莉,王建文,王宏科. 烧变岩体特性及其注浆扩散行为研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 60 -63 .
[6] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[7] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[8] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[9] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .
[10] 马 刚 ,常晓林 ,周 伟 ,周创兵 . 基于Cosserat理论的重力坝深层抗滑稳定分析[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1505 -1512 .