›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (12): 3373-3380.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.12.005

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑时变性影响的盾构壁后注浆浆液固结及消散机制研究

梁 禹1,阳军生1,王树英1,曾学艺2   

  1. 1.中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2.长沙市城投基础设施建设项目管理有限公司,湖南 长沙 410000
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-10 出版日期:2015-12-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 作者简介:梁禹,男,1986年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下结构与隧道安全方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年项目(No. 51208516);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目:中南大学研究生自主探索创新基金(2013zzts051)。

A study on grout consolidation and dissipation mechanism during shield backfilled grouting with considering time effect

LIANG Yu1, YANG Jun-sheng1, WANG Shu-ying1, ZENG Xue-yi2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075 China; 2. Changsha Urban Investment and Construction Group, Changsha, Hunan 410000, China
  • Received:2015-05-10 Online:2015-12-11 Published:2018-06-14
  • Supported by:

    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Youths of China (Grant No. 51208516) and Exploration and Innovation Foundation for Graduate of Central South University (Grant No. 2013zzts051).

摘要: 在盾构管片壁后注浆时,由于浆液渗透压的存在,浆液会向外渗透,浆体本身逐渐固结,作用在管片上的注浆压力逐渐消散。考虑到浆液往周边地层渗透过程中由于黏度的变化会引起地层渗透系数的变化,推导了基于浆液黏度时变性的浆体固结变形方程和浆液压力消散方程,分析了浆液固结、消散及浆液压力沿管片外壁分布规律,为精细化分析施工阶段管片受力提供了计算依据。计算结果表明:浆液从注浆口喷出后,浆液黏性的增大使浆液流动性减小,注浆压力消散幅度减小,浆液消散持续时间变短。浆液配比与围岩渗透系数变化对注浆压力消散幅度及消散持续时间存在一定影响。现场实测结果与理论计算结果较为一致。在进行壁后注浆时,应充分考虑时变作用下浆液消散作用的影响。

关键词: 壁后注浆, 浆液固结, 浆液压力消散, 浆液时变性

Abstract: The water in grout will permeate toward surrounding rock due to the osmotic pressure, so that the grout itself will consolidate gradually during shield backfilled grouting; and the grouting pressure will dissipates slowly. The variation of grout viscosity will lead to a change in the permeability of soil layers during the grouting process. Based on this fact, the grout consolidation and pressure dissipation equations have been deduced; and the distribution regularities of grouting pressure acting on segments have been analyzed, which provide a guideline for fine analysis of segment mechanics during construction. The results show that: the increase of grout viscosity will result in decreases in the grout liquidity, the extent of grouting pressure dissipation and duration time of grout dissipation. The variation of grout mixing proportion and permeability coefficient of surrounding rock can also influence the extent of grouting pressure dissipation and duration time of grout dissipation.. The calculated results are consistent with the field measured results. It is suggested that the grout dissipation effect due to time-varying should be taken into account in backfilled grouting.

Key words: backfilled grouting, grout consolidation, grout pressure dissipation, grout viscosity variation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 叶 飞 ,苟长飞 ,毛家骅 ,杨鹏博 ,陈 治 ,贾 涛,. 黏土地层盾构隧道临界注浆压力计算及影响因素分析[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 937-945.
[2] 赵武胜 ,何先志 ,陈卫忠 ,杨建平 ,王 辉 ,袁敬强 . 盾构隧道地震响应分析方法及工程应用[J]. , 2012, 33(8): 2415-2421.
[3] 沈林冲,钟小春,秦建设,闵凡路. 钱塘江盾构越江隧道最小覆土厚度的确定[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 111-115.
[4] 钟小春 ,左 佳 ,刘泉维 ,韩月旺 . 地层中粉细砂在盾构壁后注浆中的再利用研究[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 293-296.
[5] 钟小春. 盾构隧道监测土压力匹配误差分析[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 402-405.
[6] 杜 军,黄宏伟,谢雄耀. 注浆材料介电常数在雷达图像识别中的应用[J]. , 2006, 27(7): 1219-1223.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙树林,李 方,谌 军. 掺石灰黏土电阻率试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 51 -55 .
[2] 李英勇,张顶立,张宏博,宋修广. 边坡加固中预应力锚索失效机制与失效效应研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 144 -150 .
[3] 李 晶,缪林昌,钟建驰,冯兆祥. EPS颗粒混合轻质土反复荷载下变形和阻尼特性[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1769 -1775 .
[4] 梁健伟,房营光,谷任国. 极细颗粒黏土渗流的微电场效应分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3043 -3050 .
[5] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556 -3562 .
[6] 李秀珍,王成华,邓宏艳. DDA法和Fisher判别法在潜在滑坡判识中的应用比较[J]. , 2011, 32(1): 186 -192 .
[7] 吉武军. 黄土隧道工程问题调查分析[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 387 -390 .
[8] 陈力华 ,林 志 ,李星平. 公路隧道中系统锚杆的功效研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1843 -1848 .
[9] 郑 刚 张立明 刁 钰. 开挖条件下坑底工程桩工作性状及沉降计算分析[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3089 -3096 .
[10] 赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐. 岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 524 -530 .