水中超深大沉井施工期间侧压力现场监测研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2170

岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 1551-1560.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2170

水中超深大沉井施工期间侧压力现场监测研究

蒋炳楠¹，马建林¹，褚晶磊¹，李孟豪¹，李军堂²，徐力³

1. 西南交通大学土木工程学院，四川成都 610031；2. 中铁大桥局集团有限公司，湖北武汉 430050； 3. 中国中铁大桥勘测设计院集团有限公司，湖北武汉 430056

收稿日期:2017-10-29 出版日期:2019-04-11 发布日期:2019-04-28
通讯作者: 马建林，男，1958年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事深基础理论及应用、边坡支挡工程、深大基坑工程等方面的研究。 E-mail: majianlin01@126.com E-mail: 1183122662@qq.com
作者简介:蒋炳楠，男，1992年生，博士研究生，主要从事深基础方面的理论及应用研究。
基金资助:
中国铁路总公司科技研究开发计划(No. 2013G001-A-2)；国家重点研发计划专项课题、区域综合交通基础设施安全保障技术 (No.2016YFC2203)。

On-site monitoring of lateral pressure of ultra-deep large and subaqueous open caisson during construction

JIANG Bing-nan¹, MA Jian-lin¹, CHU Jing-lei¹, LI Meng-hao¹, LI Jun-tang², XU Li³

1. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2.China Railway Major Bridge Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430050, China; 3. China Railway Major Bridge Reconnaissance & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China

Received:2017-10-29 Online:2019-04-11 Published:2019-04-28
Supported by:
This work was supported by the China Railway Corporation Technology Research and Development Plan (2013G001-A-2) and the National Key Research and Development Projects, Regional Comprehensive Transportation Infrastructure Security Technology (2016YFC2203).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以目前世界规模最大沉井基础——沪通大桥29#沉井的施工为背景，对沉井整个施工过程开展现场监测试验，分析监测数据，得出朗肯静止土压力理论和规范算法与实测数据相比存在较大误差。采用折线分布推算也因侧压力影响因素较多，分布规律复杂，所得结果较差。再分别对沉井下沉和接高施工期间侧压力的大小和分布特性的影响因素进行研究，得出了侧压力在沉井下沉阶段和接高阶段的主要影响因素为沉井倾斜、沉井埋深、外井壁台阶设置和压力松弛影响范围。通过对比分析，对各种因素的产生原因和影响机制进行了说明。在消除沉井倾斜对水中超深大沉井侧压力影响后，确定了侧压力在沉井侧壁上沿深度的分布形式，并建立侧摩阻力计算模型。

关键词: 沉井基础, 侧压力, 下沉

Abstract: On the basis of construction of the No.29 open caisson of Hutong Bridge, which is the largest open caisson in the world, in-site monitoring tests were carried out on the entire process of the open caisson construction. By analyzing the monitoring data, it is concluded that results predicted by Rankine's theory of stationary earth pressure and its normative algorithm are significantly different from the measured data. The result of polyline distribution projection is not satisfactory because there are many influencing factors of lateral pressure and its distribution is complicated. Then, the influencing factors on the size and distribution of lateral pressure during the sinking and subsequent construction of caisson are studied. It is concluded that the main influencing factors of the lateral pressure during the sinking stage and the heightening stage are the slant of caisson, the depth of caisson, the step setting of caisson sidewall and the range of pressure relaxation. The causes and mechanism of various factors are explained based on comparison and analysis. The distribution of lateral pressure along the vertical caisson sidewall and the side frictional resistance calculation model are determined after eliminating the effect of the caisson slant on the lateral pressure of the ultra-deep large and subaqueous open caisson.

Key words: open caisson, lateral pressure, sinking

中图分类号:

TD 853.34

蒋炳楠, 马建林, 褚晶磊, 李孟豪, 李军堂, 徐力, . 水中超深大沉井施工期间侧压力现场监测研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1551-1560.

JIANG Bing-nan, MA Jian-lin, CHU Jing-lei, LI Meng-hao, LI Jun-tang, XU Li, . On-site monitoring of lateral pressure of ultra-deep large and subaqueous open caisson during construction[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(4): 1551-1560.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	蒋炳楠, 马建林, 李孟豪, 褚晶磊. 水中沉井下沉期间刃脚空间受力试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1693-1703.
[2]	朱俊高, 蒋明杰, 陆阳洋, 吉恩跃, 罗学浩, . 应力状态对粗颗粒土静止侧压力系数影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 827-833.
[3]	谭国宏, 肖海珠, 杜勋, 胡文军. 大跨度公铁合建斜拉桥主塔沉井基础沉降变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1113-1120.
[4]	尹乾, 靖洪文, 刘日成, 苏海健, 蔚立元, 王迎超. 不同侧压力系数下裂隙网络岩体非线性渗流特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 592-600.
[5]	周和祥, 马建林, 张凯, 罗朝洋, 杨柏, . 沉井下沉阻力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3969-3976.
[6]	朱俊高，陆阳洋，蒋明杰，褚福永，. 新型静止侧压力系数试验仪的研制与应用[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3071-3076.
[7]	蒙伟，何川，汪波，张钧博，吴枋胤，夏舞阳. 基于侧压力系数的岩爆区初始地应力场二次反演分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4191-4200.
[8]	祁越，刘润，练继建,. 无黏性土中筒型基础负压下沉模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 139-150.
[9]	闫澍旺，林澍，霍知亮，楚剑，郭伟,. 桶形基础液压下沉过程的耦合欧拉-拉格朗日有限元法分析[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 247-252.
[10]	张治国，徐晓洋，赵其华,. 水平地震力作用下浅埋偏压隧道围岩压力的简化理论分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 16-24.
[11]	李春意，高永格，崔希民，. 基于正态分布时间函数地表动态沉陷预测研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 108-116.
[12]	许国胜，李德海，侯得峰，张彦宾. 厚松散层下开采地表动态移动变形规律实测及预测研究[J]. , 2016, 37(7): 2056-2062.
[13]	刘清秉，吴云刚，项伟，汪稔,. K0及三轴应力状态下压实膨胀土膨胀模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2795-2802.
[14]	夏小刚，黄庆享,. 基于“四带”划分的弯曲下沉带岩层移动预计模型[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2255-2260.
[15]	邹丹，贺怀建，. 砂土中单桩抗拔极限承载力的计算[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 245-249.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

水中超深大沉井施工期间侧压力现场监测研究

On-site monitoring of lateral pressure of ultra-deep large and subaqueous open caisson during construction

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0