岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (8): 2907-2913.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0908

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环脱吸湿与加卸载耦合作用下 土体持水性能试验研究

陈 勇1, 2,苏 剑1,谈云志1, 2,CHAN Dave1   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-24 出版日期:2019-08-12 发布日期:2019-08-24
  • 作者简介:陈勇,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事非饱和土的力学特性及边坡稳定分析研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51409149);湖北省高等学校优秀中青年科技创新团队计划项目(No. T201803)。

Water retention capacities of soils under the coupling actions of cyclic drying-wetting and repeated loading-unloading

CHEN Yong1, 2, SU Jian1, TAN Yun-zhi1, 2, CHAN Dave1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China
  • Received:2018-05-24 Online:2019-08-12 Published:2019-08-24
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51409149) and the University Outstanding Young Innovation Team Project of Hubei(T201803).

摘要: 土体所经历的干湿循环和应力历史,对其孔隙结构和持水性能影响明显。为进一步深入研究二者耦合作用的影响,开展了先竖向固结再循环脱吸湿以及先气压脱湿再反复竖向加卸载两种不同加载路径的水分变化测量试验,探索土样持水性能和变形能力的演化规律。研究结果表明:(1)脱湿与吸湿路径对比,土体的持水能力具有明显的差异性,且土体越密实,这种差异性越强烈;(2)随着脱吸湿循环次数的增加,土样的进气值略有增大,减湿段和吸湿段的斜率都会减小,但影响趋势随循环次数增多而减弱;(3)对于气压减湿后的非饱和土样,其前期固结压力随气压值增加而增大,而加卸载形成的滞回圈的面积却随之减小,土体的持水性能和变形能力也降低;(4)重塑土样从不同加载路径首次达到同一应力状态时,先固结再脱湿路径下土样的体积收缩更多,而先施加气压再加载路径下土样持水性能减弱的更多。

关键词: 循环脱吸湿, 反复加卸载, 耦合作用, 持水性能, 变形能力

Abstract: The pore structure and water retention capacity of soils are significantly affected by the cyclic drying-wetting and stress history. To further study the coupling actions of the two factors, water content variation tests were carried out following two different loading paths, i.e., the drying-wetting cycles after vertical consolidation, and the vertical loading-unloading cycles after the air-dried process. The variation tendencies of the water retention capacity and deformation behaviors of soil specimens were explored. The results indicated that the water retention capacity of soil during drying process is significantly different from that during wetting process, and the difference gap tends to decrease with increasing the consolidation pressure. With the increase in the number of drying-wetting cycles, the air-entry values increase while the slopes of the drying phase and wetting phase decrease. These changing tendencies are less significant upon more drying-wetting cycles. As for the soil specimens with different degrees of saturation, with the increase in the pore air pressure, the pre-consolidation pressures of soils are augmented, whereas the areas of hysteresis loop decrease, and hence resulting in decrease in the water retention capacities and deformation. The identical stress states can be reached from two different paths. It was found that the volumetric shrinkage is higher for the soil specimens following the path of drying process after consolidation, and the water retention capacities are lower for the soil specimens following the path of loading after air-dried process.

Key words: cyclic drying-wetting, repeated loading-unloading, coupling action, water retention capacity, deformation behavio

中图分类号: 

  • TU 46+2
[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 贺桂成, 廖家海, 李丰雄, 王 昭, 章求才, 张志军. 水饱和边坡夹层热-孔隙水-力耦合作用模型及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1663-1672.
[3] 韩 冰,梁建文,朱 俊,. 深厚饱和软土场地中透镜体对上部结构地震响应的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2227-2236.
[4] 杨冬英,丁海平. 非均质土中桩端扩散虚土桩法的桩基纵向振动研究[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 311-318.
[5] 汤艳春 ,周 辉 ,许 模 . 应力-溶解耦合作用下的盐腔水溶建腔机制研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 37-0045.
[6] 言志信 ,高 乐 ,彭宁波 ,任志华 ,郭 斌 . 顺层岩质边坡地震动力响应研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 85-090.
[7] 刘 镇,周翠英. 新旧立体交叉隧道系统力学耦合作用全过程与规律[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 494-500.
[8] 谈云志,孔令伟 ,郭爱国 ,万 智 ,张 华. 压实红黏土的持水性能与机制分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 334-0338.
[9] 张 云,薛禹群,吴吉春,何佳佳,王惠敏. 饱和黏性土蠕变变形试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 672-676.
[10] 陈炳瑞,冯夏庭,姚华彦,徐速超. 水化学溶液下灰岩力学特性及神经网络模拟研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1173-1180.
[11] 许建聪,郭书太. 地下水封油库围岩地下水渗流量计算[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1295-1302.
[12] 杨继红 ,董金玉 ,刘汉东 ,黄志全 ,刘海宁. 某水电站左坝肩上方堆积体成因机制分析及稳定性评价[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 408-413.
[13] 郑 刚,王 丽. 成层土中倾斜荷载作用下桩承载力有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 680-687.
[14] 王建秀 ,胡力绳 ,张 金 ,唐益群 ,杨 坪 . 高水压隧道围岩渗流-应力耦合作用模式研究[J]. , 2008, 29(S1): 237-240.
[15] 左建平 ,周宏伟 ,谢和平 ,鞠 杨 . 温度和应力耦合作用下砂岩破坏的细观试验研究[J]. , 2008, 29(6): 1447-1482.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!