断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1240

岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S2): 53-61.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1240

断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究

王鹏飞¹，李长洪¹，马学文²，李子建²，刘景军²，武洋帆²

1. 北京科技大学金属矿山高效开采与安全教育部重点实验室，北京 100083；2 北京科技大学土木与资源工程学院，北京 100083

收稿日期:2018-07-11 出版日期:2018-12-21 发布日期:2019-01-02
通讯作者: 李长洪，男，1962年生，博士，教授，主要从事岩土工程、采矿工程以及工程力学等方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: lch@ustb.edu.cn E-mail:b20150011@xs.ustb.edu.cn
作者简介:王鹏飞，男，1988年生，博士，主要从事裂隙岩体力学及渗流特性等方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（No.2017YFC0804103）；国家自然科学基金项目（No.11572344）

Experimental study of seepage characteristics of soil-rock mixture with different rock contents in fault zone

WANG Peng-fei¹, LI Chang-hong¹, MA Xue-wen², LI Zi-jian², LIU Jing-jun², WU Yang-fan²

1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mine, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2018-07-11 Online:2018-12-21 Published:2019-01-02
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFC0804103) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(11572344).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 将断层带现场取出的断层泥及断层角砾混合物制成含石率分别为20%、30%、40%、50%、60%和70%的土石混合体重塑试样，应用GDS饱和-非饱和三轴试验系统测试在不同围压加、卸载条件下土石混合体试样的渗透特性，研究不同含石率土石混合体试样在不同围压水平作用下渗透系数的变化规律。试验结果表明，（1）不同含石率土石混合体(SRM)试样的渗透系数均随围压的增加而减小，且在围压加载初期试样渗透系数的降低速度较快，在围压加载中后期试样渗透系数的降低速度相对减缓；（2）在围压加载和卸载阶段，不同围压水平下土石混合体试样的渗透系数随着含石率的升高，均呈现出先减小后增大的趋势，含石率40%试样的渗透系数最小，含石率70%试样的渗透系数最大；（3）在围压卸载阶段，土石混合体试样渗透系数的恢复程度随着含石率的升高而增大，含石率70%试样渗透系数的恢复率达到50.2%；（4）在围压加载和卸载阶段，随着含石率升高，土石混合体试样渗透系数对含石率变化的敏感系数均呈现出先减小后增大再减小的趋势，在含石率60%时，试样渗透系数对含石率变化的敏感性最强；（5）围压加载和卸载阶段土石混合体试样渗透系数与围压的关系均可用指数函数进行描述。

关键词: 断层带, 含石率, 土石混合体(SRM), 围压加卸载, 渗流特性

Abstract: The mixture of fault gouge and rubble which taken out from fault zone is used to make the soil-rock mixture(SRM) sample with rock block proportions of 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60% and 70% respectively, and using GDS triaxial test system to measure the seepage characteristics of SRM sample under the different loading and unloading confining pressures, to research the variation law of permeability coefficient of the SRM(soil-rock mixture) sample with different rock block proportions under different confining pressure levels. The test results show that: (1) The permeability coefficient of the SRM sample with different rock block proportions decreases as the pressure increases; and the decrease rate of permeability coefficient in the initial stage of confining pressure loading is obviously higher than in the semi-late period. (2) In the stage of confining pressure loading and unloading, the permeability coefficient of SRM sample at different confining pressure levels present a common trend that with the increase of rock block proportion; it decrease first then increase, the permeability coefficient of the sample with rock block proportion 40% is the smallest; 70% is the largest. (3) In the stage of confining pressure unloading; the recovery degree of permeability coefficient of SRM sample is ascend with the increase of rock block proportion, and the recovery rate of SRM sample with rock block proportion 70% reached 50.2%. (4) In the stage of confining pressure loading and unloading; the sensitivity of the permeability coefficient of SRM sample to the rock block proportion showed a rule of decrease first, then increase and then decrease; and when rock block proportion reached 60%, the sensitivity is highest. (5) In the stage of confining pressure loading and unloading, the relationship between permeability coefficient and confining pressure can described by exponential function.

Key words: fault zone, rock-bearing rate, soil-rock mixture(SRM), confining pressure loading and unloading, seepage characteristics

中图分类号:

TU452

王鹏飞, 李长洪, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 53-61.

WANG Peng-fei, LI Chang-hong, MA Xue-wen, LI Zi-jian, LIU Jing-jun, WU Yang-fan, . Experimental study of seepage characteristics of soil-rock mixture with different rock contents in fault zone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(S2): 53-61.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2]	刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[3]	李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[4]	王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[5]	张天军, 庞明坤, 蒋兴科, 彭文清, 纪翔, . 负压对抽采钻孔孔周煤体瓦斯渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2517-2524.
[6]	丁红岩，贾楠，张浦阳, . 砂土中筒型基础沉放过程渗流特性和沉贯阻力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3130-3138.
[7]	王志良，申林方，李邵军，徐则民，. 基于格子Boltzmann方法的岩体单裂隙面渗流特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1203-1210.
[8]	李利平，柳尚，李术才，石少帅，陈迪杨，周毅，林鹏，王健华，刘聪,. 应力-渗流耦合三轴渗透试验系统研制及其在充填介质渗透特性试验中的应用[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3053-3061.
[9]	盛金昌，白柯含，杨旭，郑忠巍，詹美礼，孙永军，杨慧，. 膨润土防水毯破损条件下渗流特性试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 315-320.
[10]	康向涛，黄滚，宋真龙，邓博知，罗甲渊，张鑫 , . 三轴压缩下含瓦斯煤的能耗与渗流特性研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 762-768.
[11]	刘胜利，陈善雄，刘伟，余飞，罗红明，赵文光，. 风化片岩残积土剪切特性研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3520-3526.
[12]	王年香，章为民，顾行文，张丹 . 高堆石坝心墙渗流特性离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 2769-2773.
[13]	杨冰，杨军，常在，甘厚义，宋二祥. 土石混合体压缩性的三维颗粒力学研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1645-1650.
[14]	谢兴华，王国庆. 深厚覆盖层坝基防渗墙深度研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2708-2712.
[15]	朱珍德, 张爱军, 徐卫亚. 脆性岩石全应力-应变过程渗流特性试验研究[J]. , 2002, 23(5): 555-558.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究

Experimental study of seepage characteristics of soil-rock mixture with different rock contents in fault zone

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0