岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 23-31.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2359

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究

梁珂1,何杨1,陈国兴1, 2   

  1. 1. 南京工业大学 岩土工程研究所,江苏 南京 210009;2. 南京工业大学 江苏省土木工程防震技术研究中心,江苏 南京 210009
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-29 修回日期:2019-04-28 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 通讯作者: 陈国兴,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土动力学与岩土地震工程研究。E-mail: gxc6307@163.com E-mail:liangk91@163.com
  • 作者简介:梁珂,男,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事珊瑚砂动力特性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51678299);国家重点研发计划项目(No.2017YFC1500403);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(No.KYCX18_1057)。

Experimental study of dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio characteristics of coral sand from Nansha Islands

LIANG Ke1, HE Yang1, CHEN Guo-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China; 2. Civil Engineering and Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center of Jiangsu Province, Nanjing Tech. University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China
  • Received:2018-12-29 Revised:2019-04-28 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • About author:First author: LIANG Ke, male, (1991-), PhD candidate, Research interest: dynamic properties of coral sand. E-mail: liangk91@163.com Corresponding author: CHEN Guo-xing, male, (1963-), PhD, Professor, Research interest: soil dynamics and geotechnical earthquake engineering, E-mail: gxc6307@163.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678299), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1500403) and the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_1057).

摘要: 珊瑚砂的物理力学性质与陆相沉积物有显著的差异。对南沙岛礁饱和珊瑚砂进行了不排水应变控制分级循环加载动三轴试验,研究了有效围压 和相对密实度Dr对饱和珊瑚砂动剪切模量和阻尼比特性的影响。通过与陆源砂砾土试验结果的对比发现:珊瑚砂与陆源砂砾土在最大动剪切模量Gmax、动剪切模量比G/Gmax曲线及其上下界、参考剪应变 、阻尼比? 曲线及其上下界等均存在显著的差异;珊瑚砂的Gmax比陆源砂的大,采用陆源砂Gmax的经验模型,珊瑚砂的Gmax将被低估约30%;珊瑚砂的非线性稍弱于陆源砂砾土,陆源砂砾土G/Gmax和? 的经验公式不适用于珊瑚砂。给出了珊瑚砂G/Gmax和? 的经验公式及相关参数。

关键词: 南沙珊瑚砂, 最大动剪切模量, 动剪切模量比, 阻尼比, 动三轴试验

Abstract: The physical and engineering mechanical behaviors between coral sand and terrigenous sandy soils are considerably different. To study these behaviours, a series of undrained multistage strain-controlled cyclic triaxial tests was conducted on saturated coral sand from Nansha Islands, South China Sea. The influence of effective confining pressure and relative density Dr on the dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio of coral sand was studied. Compared with the test results of coral sand and terrigenous sandy soil and gravel, significant differences were found in the maximum shear modulus Gmax, the shapes and the upper and lower boundaries of shear modulus ratio G/Gmax curves, reference shear strains , the shapes and the upper and lower boundaries of damping ratio ? curves. The maximum shear modulus Gmax of coral sand is higher than that of terrigenous sandy soil and gravel, and the Gmax of coral sand predicted by empirical equations of terrigenous sandy soil is underestimated by 30%. The nonlinearity of coral sand is slightly weaker than that of terrigenous sandy soil and gravel. The empirical formulas for predicting G/Gmax and ? of terrigenous sandy soil and gravel are not applicable for Nansha coral sand. The empirical formulas for predicting G/Gmax and ? of coral sand are proposed.

Key words: Nansha coral sand, the maximum shear modulus, shear modulus ratio, damping ratio, cyclic triaxial test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.8
[1] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[2] 蒋长宝, 魏 财, 段敏克, 陈昱霏, 余塘, 李政科, . 饱水和天然状态下页岩滞后效应及阻尼特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1799-1808.
[3] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[4] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 杭天柱, 刘抗, 何杨, . 砂类土最大动剪切模量的新预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1963-1970.
[5] 孙静, 公茂盛, 熊宏强, 甘霖睿, . 冻融循环对粉砂土动力特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 747-754.
[6] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[7] 芮圣洁, 国振, 王立忠, 周文杰, 李雨杰, . 钙质砂与钢界面循环剪切刚度与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 78-86.
[8] 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 何 杨, 刘景儒, . 基于相关函数理论的动模量和阻尼比计算新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1368-1376.
[9] 裴向军, 朱 凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及 滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[10] 王丽艳, 巩文雪, 曹晓婷, 姜朋明, 王炳辉. 砾钢渣抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[11] 周恩全, 王琼, 宗之鑫, 陆建飞. 饱和橡胶砂动力特性动三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3797-3804.
[12] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[13] 李 宣, 孙德安,张俊然,. 吸力历史对非饱和粉土动力变形特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2829-2836.
[14] 张 炜,李 亚,周松望,蒋正波,吴 非,梁文洲,. 南海北部区域黏土循环动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2413-2423.
[15] 孔纲强,李 辉,王忠涛,文 磊,. 透明砂土与天然砂土动力特性对比[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1935-1940.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!