岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 527-534.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0262

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同夯点布置形式下群夯加固效果研究

窦锦钟1,邵雪莹2,廖晨聪1,陈锦剑1   

  1. 1. 上海交通大学 船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240;2. 上海市城市建设设计研究总院(集团)有限公司,上海 200125
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-27 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 廖晨聪,男,1990年生,博士,助理研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事岩土工程数值分析方面的工作。E-mail:billaday@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail:djz536@sjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:窦锦钟,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程动力计算方面研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41330633,No.51679134,No.41727802)。

Study on multi-tamping effects under different arrangement forms of tamping location

DOU Jin-zhong1, SHAO Xue-ying2, LIAO Chen-cong1, CHEN Jin-jian1   

  1. 1. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Shanghai Urban Construction Design & Research Institute [Group] Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200125, China
  • Received:2019-01-27 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41330633, 51679134, 41727802).

摘要: 强夯作为一种高效的地基加固技术已被广泛地应用于各类工程建设中,针对强夯的理论研究主要集中于单点夯作用下的土体响应方面,对群夯作用下相邻夯点的相互作用研究较少。为研究不同夯点布置形式对强夯加固效果的影响,在LS-DYNA的框架内,采用非线性大变形显式有限元算法和“帽子”本构模型计算了强夯作用下土体的压密程度。首先,基于单点夯试验,通过夯周土体侧向位移的数值计算结果与实测数据的对比,验证了模型的合理性。在该基础上对菱形、正方形两种常见夯点布置形式下的强夯施工过程进行了数值模拟,研究不同夯点布置形式对强夯过程中土体压密程度的影响。结果表明,夯点间土体同时受相邻夯点的影响,临近后期夯点的一侧土体的加固效果要优于临近先期夯点的一侧;夯点按菱形布置(等边三角形)时土体的加固效果要优于夯点按正方形布置(等腰直角三角形)。此外,夯坑深度、有效加固深度可以将强夯影响深度以内的土体划分为土体剪胀区、强加固区和轻微扰动区三部分。

关键词: 强夯, 土体加固, 多夯点, 夯点布置形式, 相对密实度, 塑性体积应变

Abstract: As an efficient foundation reinforcement technology, dynamic compaction technology has been widely used in various engineering constructions. However, most related theoretical research mainly focus on the tamping at a single location, and the interaction between adjacent tamping points under tamping at several locations simultaneously is rarely studied. In order to investigate the reinforcement impacts of multi-tamping under different arrangement forms of tamping location, the geometric nonlinear finite element method for large deformation and the constitutive model of “cap” in the framework of LS-DYNA are applied to analyze the degree of soil compactness under strong tamping at multi-locations. Firstly, based on the tamping experiment at a actual situation of site construction, the rationality of the model is verified by comparing the numerical results with the measured data for the lateral displacement in the soil around the tamping points. Moreover, considering two common arrangements of tamping points (i.e. rhombus-grid pattern and square-grid pattern), numerical simulations are carried out on the dynamic construction process, and compaction degree of the soil under different layouts of tamping points are studied. The results show that the compacted area between adjacent tamping locations is susceptible to multi-tamping effects, and the reinforcement degree of soil near the subsequent tamping location is better than that near the previous tamping location. Besides, the reinforcement of soil is better in regions applying rhombus-grid tamping points compared with that of square-grid pattern. In addition, by using the depth of the crater and the effective reinforcement depth, the soil affected by the strong tamping can be divided into three parts: the dilatation zone, the strong reinforcement zone and the slightly disturbed zone.

Key words: dynamic compaction, soil reinforcement, multiple tamping locations, arrangement form, relative compactness, plastic volumetric strain

中图分类号: 

  • TU 753
[1] 唐国艺, 刘智, 刘争宏, 唐立军, 于永堂, 姜文, . 低能级强夯在安哥拉Quelo砂中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 203-209.
[2] 姚仰平,张北战. 基于体应变的强夯加固范围研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2663-2671.
[3] 文思强,李云鹏,马 康. 强夯能量利用率反演及加固影响范围研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 185-192.
[4] 王 威,王建华. 高能强夯下地基土体的变形特性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 315-319.
[5] 钱春香 ,王安辉 ,王 欣 , . 微生物灌浆加固土体研究进展[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1537-1548.
[6] 刘映晶 ,李 罡 ,尹振宇 ,夏小和 ,王建华,. 颗粒级配对粒状材料不排水力学特性的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 423-429.
[7] 郑凌逶 ,周风华 , . 强夯置换软土中碎石墩形成过程的试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 90-97.
[8] 安春秀 ,黄 磊 ,黄达余 ,龚晓南 . 强夯处理碎石回填土地基相关性试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 273-278.
[9] 申 昊 ,唐晓武 ,牛 犇 ,刘 续 , . 车辆荷载作用下软土地基塑性变形的计算[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3561-3566.
[10] 汪 洋 ,曾雄辉 ,尹健民 ,肖国强. 考虑卸荷效应的深埋隧洞围岩分区破坏数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1233-1239.
[11] 胡长明 ,梅 源 ,王雪艳 . 离石地区湿陷性黄土地基强夯参数的试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2903-2909.
[12] 黄 达 ,金华辉 . 土石比对碎石土强夯地基加固效果影响规律瑞利波检测分析[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3067-3072.
[13] 刘 博 ,李海波 ,冯海鹏 ,周青春 ,王 秒 ,宋全杰 . 强夯施工振动对海工防渗墙影响试验及安全监控[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3073-3080.
[14] 水伟厚. 对强夯置换概念的探讨和置换墩长度的实测研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 502-506.
[15] 陈金锋 ,宋二祥 ,徐 明. 强度折减有限元法在昆明新机场高填方边坡稳定分析中的应用[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 636-0641.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!