岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (10): 3201-3213.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.0096

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于DIC技术的砂土中圆形锚板上拔土体 变形特性试验研究

史旦达1,毛逸瑶1,杨勇1,原媛1,郝冬雪2   

  1. 1. 上海海事大学 海洋科学与工程学院,上海 201306;2. 东北电力大学 建筑工程学院,吉林 吉林 132012
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-05 修回日期:2020-06-08 出版日期:2020-10-12 发布日期:2020-11-05
  • 作者简介:史旦达,男,1979年生,博士,教授,主要从事宏细观岩土力学、海洋岩土力学等方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41772273,No. 11802172)

Experimental study on the deformation characteristics of soils around uplift circular plate anchors using digital image correlation technology

SHI Dan-da1, MAO Yi-yao1, YANG Yong1, YUAN Yuan1, HAO Dong-xue2   

  1. 1. College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin, Jilin 132012, China
  • Received:2020-02-05 Revised:2020-06-08 Online:2020-10-12 Published:2020-11-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772273, 11802172).

摘要: 针对福建标准砂,采用非接触式数字图像相关技术(digital image correlation, DIC),通过一系列室内模型试验研究了圆形锚板上拔时锚周土体的变形特性,重点分析了盘径、埋深比和砂土相对密实度的影响。试验结果表明,随着盘径的增加,同一埋深比条件下,上拔力峰值和出现上拔力峰值时的位移水平均明显增大,而上拔承载力系数N?则随着盘径的增加而减小,但盘径变化不影响上拔时锚周土体位移影响区的形状,且以上规律不受砂土相对密实度变化的影响。对于密砂,锚周土体位移影响区形状随着埋深比的增加由倒梯形向U字形发展,土体剪切破坏面为沿锚板边缘向外侧斜上方演进的直线型破坏面,且与竖直方向的夹角约为1/4?p(?p为土的峰值摩擦角);随着锚板的上拔,锚板上方土体出现较为明显的体积膨胀。对于松砂,随着埋深比的增加,锚周土体位移影响区形状由延伸至土体表面的矩形向内置于土体的贝壳形发展;浅埋时,土体剪切破坏面沿锚板边缘垂直向土体表面开展;深埋时,土体剪切破坏面沿锚板边缘向内侧斜上方发展,与水平方向的夹角约为45°+1/2?p。无论何种埋深比,锚板正上方均观测到小范围的体积膨胀区,其上为体积收缩区,且随着埋深比的增加体积收缩量逐渐增加。

关键词: 数字图像相关技术, 圆形锚板, 土体变形, 上拔承载力系数

Abstract: A series of indoor model tests was conducted to study the sand deformation characteristics around uplift circular plate anchors using digital image correlation technology, with emphasis on the effects of plate diameter, embedment ratio and relative density of sand. The experimental results show that when a same embedment ratio is reached, the peak uplift force and the displacement for the appearance of peak uplift force both increase with increasing plate diameter, yet the uplift bearing capacity coefficient decreases as plate diameter increases. The shape of influence zone concerning soil deformation is not affected by the variation of plate diameter, and this regularity is independent of soil density. For the dense sand case, as embedment ratio increases, the shape of influence zone evolves from a reversed trapezoid to a U shape, and a linear shear failure surface can be captured with the inclination angle of 1/4?p to the vertical, where ?p is the peak friction angle of soil. The surrounded soil exhibits a significant volume expansion due to the uplift of plate anchor in dense sand. For the loose sand case, as embedment ratio increases, the shape of influence zone gradually develops from a rectangle extended into soil surface, to a shell shape embedded within the soil. As to a shallow anchor in loose sand, the shear failure surface of soil perpendicularly progresses from the edge of anchor plate to soil surface. When a deep anchor in loose sand is discussed, an inside oblique shear failure surface can be observed and the inclination angle to the horizontal is about 45°+1/2?p. Irrespective of the embedment ratio, due to the uplift of plate anchor, a small volume expansion zone is observed above the anchor plate, upon which is a large volume contraction zone with the value of volume contraction increasing with the increase of anchor’s embedment ratio.

Key words: digital image correlation technology, circular plate anchor, soil deformation, uplift bearing capacity coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] 孙文进, 金爱兵, 王树亮, 赵怡晴, 韦立昌, 贾玉春, . 基于DIC的高温砂岩劈裂力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 511-518.
[2] 鲍宁, 魏静, 陈建峰. 桩承式路堤土拱效应三维离散元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 347-354.
[3] 金爱兵, 王树亮, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 陈帅军, 朱东风, . 基于DIC的3D打印交叉节理试件破裂机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3862-3872.
[4] 王志杰,Felix Jacobs,Martin Ziegler,. 土工格栅横肋对加筋砾石强度与变形特性的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2234-2240.
[5] 马永尚 ,陈卫忠 ,杨典森 ,杨建平 ,龚 哲,. 基于三维数字图像相关技术的脆性岩石破坏试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 117-123.
[6] 张 昕 ,乐金朝,刘汉东,. 砂土中群锚锚周土体变形特性模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 240-248.
[7] 王志丰 ,沈水龙,谢永利,. 水平旋喷桩施工引起周围土体变形分析[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1083-1088.
[8] 王 威,王建华. 高能强夯下地基土体的变形特性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 315-319.
[9] 魏 纲,庞思远. 双线平行盾构隧道施工引起的三维土体变形研究[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2562-2568.
[10] 景 路 ,袁聚云 ,袁 勇 . 顶管工程中的地层损失参数和土体变形计算[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 173-178.
[11] 申林方 ,王志良 ,谢建斌 . 基于边界配点法浅埋隧道开挖引起 周围土体变形的分析 [J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 297-301.
[12] 李方楠 ,沈水龙 ,罗春泳. 考虑注浆压力的顶管施工引起土体变形计算方法[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 204-208.
[13] 李 科,施 斌,唐朝生,魏广庆,王宝军. 黏性土体干缩变形分布式光纤监测试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1781-1785.
[14] 张建新,鹿 群,吴东云,孙世光. 基于模型试验的静压群桩引起的土体变形分析[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1243-1246.
[15] 毛海和. 顶管矩形工作井复合式后背墙反力分布研究[J]. , 2007, 28(6): 1212-1216.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[2] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[3] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[4] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[5] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[6] 康厚荣, ,雷明堂,张谢东,赵杰华. 贵州省公路工程岩溶环境区划[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3032 -3036 .
[7] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[8] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[9] 朱泽奇,盛 谦,梅松华,张占荣. 改进的遍布节理模型及其在层状岩体地下工程中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3115 -3121 .
[10] 徐远杰,潘家军,刘祖德. 混凝土面板堆石坝的一种坝坡修整算法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3139 -3144 .