岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2215-2224.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1506

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于多因素耦合效应的锚索预应力长期损失研究

冯忠居1,江冠1,赵瑞欣1,龙厚胜 2,王政斌1,张正旭2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2. 山东高速集团有限公司,山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-10 修回日期:2021-03-13 出版日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-08-16
  • 作者简介:冯忠居,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No. 2018YFC1504801);国家自然科学基金(No. 41272285)。

Study on pre-stress long term loss of anchor cable considering coupled multiple factors

FENG Zhong-ju1, JIANG Guan1, ZHAO Rui-xin1, LONG Hou-sheng2, WANG Zheng-bin1, ZHANG Zheng-xu2   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Shandong Hi-speed Group, Jinan, Shandong 250014, China
  • Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2021-03-13 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project (2018YFC1504801) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272285).

摘要: 为研究锚索锚固力长期损失规律及计算方法,基于广义胡克定律、松弛率时程响应方程与改进西原锚固耦合本构模型,建立了三因素锚固力损失计算方法,利用三因素损失计算方法分别计算了锚具垫板内滑锁紧、索体钢绞线应力松弛、岩体蠕变耦合的锚索预应力理论损失值。开展锚索拉拔破坏原位试验进一步验证长期损失计算方法的准确性,通过分析拉拔荷载传递机制,确定了荷载-增量位移曲线自由段拉拔阶段为锚索的工作荷载区间,取其区间中值为锚索时效锚固力,并获取了预应力长期损失实测值。研究结果表明:20年运营期锚索预应力损失值约为17.5%~27.5%;岩体蠕变是锚索预应力长期损失的最显著影响因素;三因素损失计算方法理论值与现场预应力损失实测值误差约4.2%,验证了三因素损失计算方法的准确性,表明长期预应力损失的三因素计算方法满足一定精度要求,具有可行性。

关键词: 预应力锚索, 预应力损失, 原位拉拔试验, 锚固力, 岩体蠕变

Abstract: In order to study the long-term loss law of anchorage force and the calculation method of pre-stress loss of anchorage force, a calculation method of the pre-stress loss of anchorage force was proposed to account for three factors. The proposed method is based on the generalized Hooke’s law, relaxation rate time-history response equation and improved coupling constitutive model. It was adopted to calculate the theoretical loss value of the anchor cable pre-stress coupled with the internal sliding lock of the anchor plate, the stress relaxation of the cable body steel strand, and the rock mass creep, respectively. In order to verify the accuracy of the long-term loss calculation method, the anchor cable pull-out failure test was also carried out. By analyzing the transfer mechanism of the pull-out load, it was determined that the pull-out stage of the free section of the load-incremental displacement curve was the working load interval of the anchor cable. The median value of the working load interval was taken as the effectiveness force of the anchor cable, and the measured value of the long-term loss of prestress was also obtained. Results show that the pre-stress loss of the anchor cable is about 17.5%?27.5% during 20 years. The rock mass creep is the most significant factor affecting the long-term loss of the anchor cable. Besides, there is an error of about 4.2% between the calculated value of the three-factor loss calculation method and the measured value of pre-stress loss at site. This verifies the accuracy of the three-factor loss calculation method, and also shows that the three-factor calculation method of long-term pre-stress loss mentioned here meets accuracy requirements and is feasible.

Key words: pre-stress cable, pre-stress losses, field pull-out test, anchorage force, rock creep

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 安彩龙, 梁 烨, 王亮清, 邓 姗, 孙自豪, 范斌强, 郑罗斌. 岩质边坡楔形体锚索加固方向角三维优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2765-2772.
[2] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[3] 韩冬冬, 门玉明, 胡兆江. 土质滑坡格构锚杆抗滑机制及受力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1189-1194.
[4] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[5] 贾志波, 陶连金, 史明. 地震作用下预应力锚索边坡的稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3604-3612.
[6] 杨庆光, 柳雄, 刘杰, 何杰, 梁凌川, 陈斌. 自由段先注浆对预应力锚索抗拔试验结果影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3317-3325.
[7] 蒋泽锋, 张戈, 朱大勇, 王军, . 锚固力作用下的边坡临界滑动场法研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2799-2806.
[8] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[9] 李 宁, 杨 敏, 李国锋. 再论岩土工程有限元方法的应用问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1140-1148.
[10] 严敏嘉,夏元友,刘婷婷. 地震作用下预应力锚索加固顺层岩坡极限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2691-2698.
[11] 刘永权,刘新荣,谢应坤,余 瑜, . 基坑预应力锚索初始张拉锁定值取值规律探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2164-2174.
[12] 周 勇,王旭日,朱彦鹏,李京榜,蒋小奎,. 强风化软硬互层岩质高边坡监测与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2249-2258.
[13] 张建海,王仁坤,周 钟,郑 路,张 茹,谢和平, . 高地应力地下厂房预应力锚索预紧系数[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1002-1008.
[14] 李 韬,徐奴文,戴 峰,李天斌,樊义林,李 彪,. 白鹤滩水电站左岸坝肩开挖边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 665-674.
[15] 陈昌富, 曾松林, 刘一俊. 考虑预应力损失桩-锚结构内力计算的加权残值法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4569-4576.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .