岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2269-2278.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1639

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

柱状危岩体坐落式崩塌产生涌浪的 简化数值模型与校验

黄波林1,殷跃平2,李滨3,白林丰1,秦臻1   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 防灾减灾湖北省重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 中国地质环境监测院,北京 100081; 3. 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-10 修回日期:2021-03-13 出版日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-08-16
  • 作者简介:黄波林,男,1979年生,博士,研究员,主要从事地质灾害及涌浪灾害方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC1504803, No. 2018YFC1504806)。

Simplified numerical model and verification for the impulse wave generated by situated collapse of a dangerous columnar rock mass

HUANG Bo-lin1, YIN Yue-ping2, LI Bin3, BAI Lin-feng1, QIN Zhen1   

  1. 1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation, Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. China Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China; 3. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2021-03-13 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC1504803, 2018YFC1504806).

摘要: 许多水库峡谷区和海岸带存在柱状崩塌,它们可能因为软弱基座的破坏而发生坐落式崩塌,碎屑冲击入水将形成涌浪;快速、准确地预测分析大面积、长距离的该类涌浪问题面临着挑战。将崩塌体-水体耦合作用过程黑箱化,利用物理试验公式形成高精度的初始涌浪产生模型,利用Boussinesq模型控制初始涌浪事件波的传播,构建了一个计算精度与物理试验相近的简化涌浪数值模型3D-LWBM。并对这一数值模型进行了应用校验,结果显示:(1)3D-LWBM模拟的伪二维数值液面和测点水位过程的时序性和精确度都和物理试验结果有很好的一致性,精确度高。(2)在三峡库区龙门寨危岩体复杂地形河道中,3D-LWBM预测了涌浪的产生与传播;与流固全耦合模拟结果相比较,它具有较好的计算精度和极快的计算速度。(3)网格尺寸是初始波长的1/6~1/4时,3D-LWBM可以得到较精确的合理解;同时,3D-LWBM有其自身的适用范围。该研究可为相关涌浪防灾减灾提供技术支撑。

关键词: 坐落式崩塌, 滑坡涌浪, 简化数值模型, 初始涌浪产生模型, 三峡库区

Abstract: There are columnar collapse in many reservoir gorges and coastal zones, these collapse may be exhibited by situated collapse due to the failure of weak base rock mass. The debris will impact into the water and form impulse waves. It is a challenge to predict and analyze the large area and long-distance impulse wave quickly and accurately. The coupling process of collapse body and water body is black boxed, a high-precision initial surge generation model is formed by using the physical test formula, and the Boussinesq model is used to control the propagation of initial surge event wave. A simplified surge numerical model 3D-LWBM with similar calculation accuracy to the physical test is constructed. The results show that: 1) The timing sequence and accuracy of 3D-LWBM simulation of pseudo-two-dimensional numerical liquid level and measured point water level are in good agreement with the physical experiment results, and the accuracy is high. 2) The generation and propagation of impulse waves are predicted by 3D-LWBM in the complicated topographic channel of Longmenzhai dangerous rock mass in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Compared with the results of fluid-landslide full coupled simulation, 3D-LWBM has better calculatiion accuracy and faster calculation speed. 3) When the mesh size is 1/6?1/4 of the initial wave length, 3D-LWBM can obtain a more accurate and resonable result. At the same time, 3D-LWBM has its own scope of application. This study can provide technical support for disaster prevention and mitigation of relevant impulse waves.

Key words: situated collapse, landslide-induced impulse wave, simplified numerical model, initial impulse wave generation model, the Three Gorges Reservoir area

中图分类号: 

  • TU 42
[1] 张全, 黄波林, 郑嘉豪, 赵海林, 冯万里, 陈小婷, . 柱状危岩体压溃式崩塌产生涌浪预测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2845-2854.
[2] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[3] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[4] 邓冬梅,梁 烨,王亮清,王昌硕,孙自豪,王 聪,董曼曼. 基于集合经验模态分解与支持向量机回归的位移预测方法:以三峡库区滑坡为例[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3660-3669.
[5] 丁王飞,周云涛, . 三峡库区蓄水期间类土质岸坡断裂解体机制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 197-204.
[6] 周云涛 . 三峡库区危岩稳定性断裂力学计算方法[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 495-499.
[7] 王世昌,黄波林,刘广宁,陈小婷. 龚家方4号斜坡涌浪数值模拟分析[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 212-218.
[8] 黄锦林 ,张 婷,李嘉琳 , . 库岸滑坡涌浪经验估算方法对比分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 133-140.
[9] 郑 轩 ,孔令伟,. 连续桩键结构的抗滑机制及加固效果研究[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2616-2622.
[10] 卢书强 ,易庆林 ,易 武 ,黄海峰 ,张国栋 , . 三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1123-1130.
[11] 周桂云 ,李同春 ,钱七虎 . 水库滑坡涌浪传播有限元数值模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1197-1201.
[12] 肖诗荣 ,卢树盛 ,管宏飞 ,宋桂林,. 三峡库区凉水井滑坡地质力学模型研究[J]. , 2013, 34(12): 3534-3542.
[13] 鲁 涛,王孔伟,李建林. 库水压力作用下砂岩破坏形式的探究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413-0418.
[14] 李远耀,殷坤龙,柴 波,张桂荣. 三峡库区滑带土抗剪强度参数的统计规律研究[J]. , 2008, 29(5): 1419-1424.
[15] 李维树,丁秀丽,邬爱清,熊诗湖. 蓄水对三峡库区土石混合体直剪强度参数的弱化程度研究[J]. , 2007, 28(7): 1338-1342.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .