岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 755-764.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0214

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究

汤明高,李松林,许 强,龚正峰,祝 权,魏 勇   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-28 修回日期:2019-08-02 出版日期:2020-03-11 发布日期:2020-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 李松林,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体稳定性方面的研究工作。E-mail: lsl68@foxmail.com E-mail: tomyr2008@163.com
  • 作者简介:汤明高,男,1978年生,博士,教授,主要从事地质灾害预测评价及防治处理方面的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.41977255);三峡后续工作地质灾害防治研究课题(No.000121 2015C C60 005);四川省应用基础研究重点项目(No.2019YJ0403)

Study of deformation characteristics of reservoir landslide based on centrifugal model test

TANG Ming-gao, LI Song-lin, XU Qiang, GONG Zheng-feng, ZHU Quan, WEI Yong   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2019-01-28 Revised:2019-08-02 Online:2020-03-11 Published:2020-05-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41977255), the Geological Hazard Prevention Project of Three Gorges (000121 2015C C60 005) and the Sichuan Science and Technology Program(2019YJ0403).

摘要: 三峡库区蓄水后,大量库岸滑坡发生复活变形,为研究滑坡随库水位升降的变形特征和机制,以库区典型直线形滑面形态滑坡为地质原型,概化设计了大尺度离心模型试验,通过模拟两个水位升降过程,布设高速相机和传感器,获取了滑坡变形演化全过程高清影像、孔压和土压?时间变化曲线,可得以下研究结果:在水位首次下降时,孔压和土压逐渐减小,当下降15 min后滑坡发生整体蠕滑变形,首先是前部产生横向张拉裂缝,中后部则是以竖直位移为主的蠕滑压密变形过程,水位停止下降2 min后变形停止,表明变形对库水位变化具有一定滞后性;当水位再次下降时,前部沿原破裂面再次下滑并失稳,中后部则无变形,变形演化具有典型牵引式特征。在库水首次入渗滑坡时,坡体孔隙水压力对库水位升降具有明显的滞后性,而在下一次水位升降过程中,这种滞后性明显减弱。该类滑坡受水位下降的动水压力效应影响较大,在滑坡变形过程中,中后部滑体变形在竖直方向的蠕滑压密行为使得中后部稳定性有所提高,因此,在后期蓄水过程中不再发生变形,试验现象与实际库岸滑坡吻合。试验揭示了三峡库区该类滑坡在水位升降条件下的变形破坏模式及长期演化趋势,为库区地灾防治提供了参考依据。

关键词: 三峡库区, 库岸滑坡, 离心模型试验, 水位升降, 变形演化

Abstract: Many landslides along the bank have reactivated after the impoundment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA). In order to study the landslide deformation characteristic subjected to fluctuation of reservoir water level, a large-scale centrifuge test model was designed based on typical landslide with rectilinear sliding surface in TGRA. The deformation images, the curves of pore water pressure (PWP) and earth pressure (EP) vs. time were obtained by high-speed cameras and pore water pressure and soil pressure sensors during the modelling of two cycles of reservoir fluctuation. The results could be summarized as follows: in the initial stage of the water level drawdown, the PWP and EP gradually decreased. When the water level fell for 15 minutes, the frontal body pull apart and down, the middle and rear parts of the landslide had a creep movement and compaction process dominated by vertical displacement, and the deformation stopped two minutes after the water level stopped falling. When the reservoir drawdown again, the frontal part slid along the original fracture zone, and no obvious deformation occurred in the middle or rear parts. In addition, when the reservoir water infiltrated into the landslide for the first time, the PWP in the slope lag behind the water level obviously, whereas the lag effect had diminished during the next time. The landslide is greatly affected by the hydrodynamic pressure of reservoir drawdown and its deformation has a retrogressive characteristic. The creep compaction behavior improved the stability of the middle and rear parts of the landslide gradually. Therefore, no deformation occurred during the water storage later, and the experimental phenomena coincide with the deformation characteristics of actual reservoir landslide. It reveals the deformation mode and evolution trend of the landslide in TGRA subjected to reservoir fluctuation, which provides a basis for the geohazard prevention.

Key words: Three Gorges Reservoir, reservoir landslide, centrifugal model test, reservoir fluctuation, landslide evolution

中图分类号: 

  • TU434
[1] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[2] 史江伟, 范燕波, 裴伟伟, 陈永辉, 张显, . 盾构下穿非连续管线变形特性及预测方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 143-150.
[3] 丁楚, 余文瑞, 史江伟, 张宇亭, 陈永辉, . 水平循环荷载下桩基变形特性的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2659-2664.
[4] 何少其, 刘元雪, 杨骏堂, 柏准, 赵久彬, . 库岸堆积层滑坡位移的分量响应模式 及多因子模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2773-2784.
[5] 黄晓虎, 易武, 黄海峰, 邓永煌. 优势流入渗与坡体变形关系研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1396-1403.
[6] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[7] 蔡正银, 代志宇, 徐光明, 任国峰. 颗粒粒径和密实度对砂土K0值影响的 离心模型试验研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3882-3888.
[8] 陈达, 许强, 郑光, 蔡国军, 彭双麒, 王卓, 何攀. 基于离心模型试验的复杂层状软岩楔形 滑坡变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3374-3384.
[9] 张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层 变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[10] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[11] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[12] 詹良通, 胡英涛, 刘小川, 陈捷, 王瀚霖, 朱斌, 陈云敏. 非饱和黄土地基降雨入渗离心模型试验 及多物理量联合监测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2478-2486.
[13] 周小文, 程 力, 周 密, 王 齐, . 离心机中球形贯入仪贯入黏土特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1713-1720.
[14] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 王 珣, 黄昊威, 黄 哲, 王智猛, . 面板对加筋土挡墙影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1427-1432.
[15] 李世俊, 马昌慧, 刘应明, 韩玉珍, 张 彬, 张 嘎, . 离心模型试验与数值模拟相结合研究 采空边坡渐进破坏特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1577-1583.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[3] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[4] 石 崇 ,徐卫亚 ,张 玉 ,李德亮 ,刘 和. 基于元胞自动机模型的堆积体动力学参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1795 -1800 .
[5] 王云岗 ,章 光 ,胡 琦. 斜桩基础受力特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2184 -2190 .
[6] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[7] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .
[8] 张春阳,曹 平,范 祥,林 杭,万琳辉. 高黏性铝土矿放矿流动性试验与微观力学研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1653 -1659 .
[9] 周爱兆 ,卢廷浩 ,姜朋明 . 基于广义位势理论的接触面本构模型一般表述[J]. , 2012, 33(9): 2656 -2662 .
[10] 卢坤林,朱大勇,杨 扬. LU Kun-lin,  ZHU Da-yong,  YANG Yang 均质边坡准三维安全系数实用计算曲线[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 111 -117 .