岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2773-2784.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0537

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

库岸堆积层滑坡位移的分量响应模式 及多因子模型

何少其1, 2,刘元雪1, 2,杨骏堂1, 2,柏准1, 2,赵久彬1, 2   

  1. 1. 陆军勤务学院 军事设施系,重庆 401311;2. 陆军勤务学院 岩土力学与地质环境保护重庆市重点实验室,重庆 401311
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-20 修回日期:2020-02-11 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 刘元雪,男,1969年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土体本构关系与地下工程稳定性的教学与科研工作。 E-mail: lyuanxue@vip.sina.com E-mail:hesqlq@outlook.com
  • 作者简介:何少其,男,1990年生,硕士研究生,主要从事滑坡监测大数据预警方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41877219);重庆市自然科学基金(No. cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0585);重庆市规划和自然资源局科技计划项目(No. KJ-2018016);陆军勤务学院研究生创新项目(No. LY180510)。

A component response mode and multi-factor model for accumulation landslide displacement induced by reservoir

HE Shao-qi1, 2, LIU Yuan-xue1, 2, YANG Jun-tang1, 2, BAI Zhun1, 2, ZHAO Jiu-bin1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Military Installations, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing 401311, China; 2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geoenvironment Protection, Army Logistics University of PLA, Chongqing 401311, China
  • Received:2019-03-20 Revised:2020-02-11 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41877219), the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2019jcyj-msxmX0585), the Science and Technology Project of Planning and Natural Resources Bureau of Chongqing Government(KJ-2018016) and the Graduate Creative Program of Army Logistics University of PLA(LY180510).

摘要: 为了更加真实地刻画库岸堆积层滑坡位移与影响因素间的显式关系,克服现有的叠加型分量响应模式难以构造位移回归函数的不足,定义了一种新的分解模式——波动比,将位移增量表述为波动比与趋势项增量之积。结合三峡库区王爷庙滑坡实例,采用低通FFT滤波方法得到趋势项位移分量,确定当月降雨量、当月水位变化、前一月波动比值为核心因子组合,通过K-Means算法建立各单因子与波动比值的相关性函数关系,并提出由诱发因素项和状态控制项组合而成的多因子概化模型。同位移实测值及叠加型的ARIMA、SVR、RF、BP预测模型进行对比分析,该方法运算简便、预测效果较好、且位移成分可解释。选取库区其他4个典型滑坡案例综合比较研究,结果进一步验证了该方法的合理性。该模式及模型能够准确反映出滑坡位移随时间推移、多因素影响、状态约束的综合响应,为研究该类型滑坡的演化机制及时空预测提供了新思路

关键词: 波动比, 多因子, 库岸滑坡, 位移分析, 演化进程

Abstract: In order to more realistically describe the explicit relation between the displacement of the reservoir bank accumulation layer landslide and its influencing factors, and overcome the shortcomings of the existing superimposed component response model which is difficult to construct the displacement regression function, a new decomposition mode—fluctuation ratio is defined, while the displacement increment is expressed as the product of the fluctuation ratio and the trend item increment. Wangyemiao landslide, a typical accumulation landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, is investigated as an example. The lowpass FFT filtering method is used to obtain the trend term displacement component. The monthly rainfall, the monthly reservoir water level and the previous month's fluctuation ratio are determined as the core factor combination. The K-means algorithm is used to establish the correlation function between each single factor and the fluctuation ratio. Then a multi-factor generalized model composed of the evoked factor term and the control term is proposed. Compared with the actual monitoring displacement and the values predicted by several other methods, our model has better prediction effect and simple operation; furthermore, the displacement components can be clearly explained. Four other typical landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir area are selected for comprehensive comparative study, the results further verify its rationality. This method can accurately reflect the comprehensive response of landslide displacement with time lapse, multi-factor influence and state constraint, which provides a new idea for studying the evolution mechanism and time-space prediction of this type of landslide.

Key words: fluctuation ratio, multi-factor, reservoir bank landslide, displacement analysis, evolutionary process

中图分类号: 

  • TU 42
[1] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[2] 江强强, 焦玉勇, 宋亮, 王浩, 谢壁婷, . 降雨和库水位联合作用下库岸滑坡模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4361-4370.
[3] 卢应发 ,黄学斌 ,刘德富,. 边坡稳定分析条块力-位移法及其应用[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2787-2798.
[4] 黄锦林 ,张 婷,李嘉琳 , . 库岸滑坡涌浪经验估算方法对比分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 133-140.
[5] 邓华锋,李建林,王乐华,周济芳,邓成进. 基于强度折减法的库岸滑坡三维有限元分析[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1604-1608.
[6] 王明华 ,晏鄂川 . 水库蓄水对库岸滑坡的影响研究[J]. , 2007, 28(12): 2722-2725.
[7] 周春梅,殷坤龙,罗 冲. 锚拉桩应用于水库库岸滑坡治理的关键问题探讨[J]. , 2005, 26(3): 450-454.
[8] 王志旺 ,杨 健 ,张保军 ,马水山,. 水库库岸滑坡稳定性研究[J]. , 2004, 25(11): 1837-1840.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[2] 蒋小伟,万 力,王旭升,武 雄,程惠红. 利用RQD估算岩体不同深度的平均渗透系数和平均变形模量[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3163 -3167 .
[3] 祝云华,刘新荣,舒志乐. 对“‘深埋隧道开挖围岩失稳突变模型研究’讨论”的答复[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3215 -3216 .
[4] 倪骁慧,朱珍德,赵 杰,李道伟,冯夏庭. 岩石破裂全程数字化细观损伤力学试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3283 -3290 .
[5] 于小军,施建勇,徐杨斌. 考虑各向异性的软黏土扰动状态本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3307 -3312 .
[6] 程 涛,晏克勤,王靖涛. 不同固结条件下黏土数值化建模的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3352 -3356 .
[7] 张强勇,刘德军,贾 超,沈 鑫,刘 健,段 抗. 盐岩油气储库介质地质力学模型相似材料的研制[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3581 -3586 .
[8] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[9] 沈 扬,周 建,龚晓南,刘汉龙,. 考虑主应力方向变化的原状软黏土应力应变性状试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3720 -3726 .
[10] 董金玉,杨继红,伍法权,王 东,杨国香. 三峡库区软硬互层近水平地层高切坡崩塌研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 151 -157 .