岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4361-4370.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1617

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨和库水位联合作用下库岸滑坡模型试验研究

江强强1, 2,焦玉勇1, 3,宋亮1, 4,王浩1,谢壁婷1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049; 3. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074;4. 贵州省交通规划勘察设计研究股份有限公司,贵州 贵阳 550081
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-03 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 焦玉勇,男,1968年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: yyjiao@cug.edu.cn E-mail: jiangqiangqiang123@126.com
  • 作者简介:江强强,男,1992年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土体力学特性及失稳机制研究
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51509243);湖北省创新群体项目(No. 2016CF023);国家重点研发计划(No. 2017YFC1501304)。

Experimental study on reservoir landslide under rainfall and water-level fluctuation

JIANG Qiang-qiang1, 2, JIAO Yu-yong1, 3, SONG Liang1, 4, WANG Hao1, XIE Bi-ting1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 4. Guizhou Provincial Communications Planning & Survey and Design Institute Co., Ltd, Guiyang, Guizhou 550081, China
  • Received:2018-09-03 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-12-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51509243), the Innovation Group Program of Hubei Province (2016CF023) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC1501304).

摘要: 受库区水位波动和降雨影响,库岸大量老滑坡体变形加剧,地质灾害问题十分突出。为研究库岸滑坡影响因素、变形演化规律及失稳条件,以大型物理模型试验为手段,选取三峡库区黄土坡滑坡临江Ⅰ号崩滑体为对象,通过考虑水位波动、降雨及其组合作用等诱发因素,开展了一系列的库岸滑坡模型试验研究。试验结果表明:水位升降,变形主要集中于模型坡体前缘,其中,水位抬升过程中,滑坡模型变形较小,变形加速阶段出现于水位下降期间,且变形速率与水位下降速率成正比,即临江Ⅰ号崩滑体为典型的动水压力型滑坡;降雨影响下坡体变形在时间和空间上存在明显分区现象,时间上,变形发展主要集中于坡体浅表层饱和之后,即短时降雨对坡体变形未产生显著影响,空间上,坡体前缘和后缘变形剧烈;库水位下降和强降雨联合作用下坡体前缘产生局部流滑破坏,并溯源发展至前缘整体破坏,为典型的牵引式破坏模式。试验揭示处于临滑阶段坡体,其孔隙水压力、土压力变化呈现异常频繁的波动现象,可为滑坡预警预报提供一定参考依据。

关键词: 库岸滑坡, 强降雨, 库水位升降, 模型试验, 破坏模式

Abstract: Due to rainfall and water-level fluctuation, deformation increases on a large number of landslides , which create severe geologic hazards problems in Three Gorges reservoir area. The study of influence factors, deformation evolution rules and instability conditions of reservoir bank landslide is conducted by physical modeling test. Taking Huangtupo riverside slump-mass No.I as an example, a typical reservoir landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, , a series of model tests of landslide was carried out by taking into account the induced factors such as water level fluctuation, rainfall and their combination. Test results show that the deformation mainly locates at the front edge of the model slope during water level fluctuation. The deformation acceleration stage occurs during the decline of water level, and the deformation rate is directly proportional to the water level decline rate, while deformation is relatively small with rising water level. Therefore, the landslide of Huangtupo riverside slump-mass No.I is a dynamic-water-pressure type. The model deformation shows obvious spatial and temporal zoning under rainfall. The deformation mainly occurs when the shallow part of the model is saturated. Spatially, large deformation is generated at the front and trailing edge of the model slope. The model slope fails from local slip failure to the leading edge failure under heavy rainfall and decline of water level, showing a progressive retrogressive mode. Finally, the experiment reveals that abnormal fluctuations of pore water pressure and earth pressure occur at the near-sliding stage, which can provide some reference for landslide warning and prediction.

Key words: landslides in reservoir area, heavy rainfall, water level fluctuation, physical model test, failure model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[6] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[7] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[8] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[9] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[10] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[11] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[12] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[13] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[14] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[15] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!