岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (12): 3873-3881.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1782

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

UH模型对粗颗粒土适用性验证及土石坝工程应用

朱俊高1,赵晓龙1,何顺宾2,田雨3   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司,四川 成都 610072;3. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-30 修回日期:2020-12-05 出版日期:2020-12-11 发布日期:2021-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 赵晓龙,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事土体基本性质及土石坝工程等方面研究。E-mail: longxingtianxiale@126.com E-mail:zhujungao@hhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:朱俊高,男,1964年生,博士,教授,主要从事土体基本性质与本构关系、土石坝工程等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(No.2018YFC1508505);国家自然科学基金(No.U1865104,No.51479052)。

Applicability verification of UH model on coarse-grained soil and its application in earth rockfill dam

ZHU Jun-gao1, ZHAO Xiao-long1, HE Shun-bin2, TIAN Yu3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. PowerChina Chengdu Engineering Corporation Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2020-11-30 Revised:2020-12-05 Online:2020-12-11 Published:2021-01-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC1508505) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1865104, 51479052).

摘要: 对3种粗颗粒土进行了常规三轴CD试验、K0压缩试验和等应力比路径试验,根据三轴试验数据标定UH(unified hardening,统一硬化)模型的参数,然后模拟另外两种路径下的应力?应变关系,并与邓肯E-B模型进行比较。结果表明:UH模型能合理地描述不同应力路径下粗颗粒土的力学特性,而邓肯E-B模型的预测结果则较差,验证了UH模型对粗颗粒土的适用性。最后利用UH模型对某心墙堆石坝进行了应力变形三维有限元分析,并将计算结果与邓肯E-B模型及现场监测值进行比较。对比显示:在坝体变形和应力的定性分布规律上,UH模型的计算结果与邓肯E-B模型基本一致;而在定量上,UH模型得到的坝体变形总体上更接近现场监测值,验证了UH模型在土石坝工程中的适用性和合理性。

关键词: 粗颗粒土, UH模型, 邓肯E-B模型, K0压缩试验, 等应力比路径试验, 土石坝

Abstract: K0 compression tests and constant stress ratio path tests were performed on three kinds of coarse-grained soils in conventional consolidated-drained (CD) triaxial tests. Parameters of unified hardening (UH) model were calibrated according to the triaxial test data, and then stress-strain relationships under the other two paths were simulated. The simulation results were compared with those obtained from Duncan’s E-B model. It is shown that UH model can reasonably describe the mechanical behaviors of coarse-grained soil under different stress paths, while Duncan’s E-B model behaves poorly in predicting the results. The applicability of UH model to coarse-grained soil has been verified. Finally, three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress and deformation for a core rockfill dam was performed by using UH model. The calculation results were compared with those of Duncan’s E-B model and the field monitoring data. It is shown that from a qualitative perspective of the distribution of dam deformation and stress, the results obtained from UH model are similar to those from Duncan’s E-B model. However, from a quantitative perspective, the deformation calculated from UH model is overall closer to the field monitoring data. The applicability and rationality of UH model in the field of earth rockfill dam have also been verified.

Key words: coarse-grained soil, UH model, Duncan’s E-B model, K0 compression test, constant stress ratio path test, earth rockfill dam

中图分类号: 

  • TU431
[1] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[2] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[3] 刘庭伟, 李俊超, 朱斌, 汪玉冰, 高玉峰, 陈云敏, . 小型土石坝加密抗液化离心机振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3695-3704.
[4] 姚仰平, 黄建, 张奎, 崔光祖. 机场高填方蠕变沉降的数值反演预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3395-3404.
[5] 丁建源, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 刘怡吟, 肖源杰, . 基于对数几率回归模型的粗颗粒土颗粒 破碎过程演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1465-1473.
[6] 朱俊高, 蒋明杰, 陆阳洋, 吉恩跃, 罗学浩, . 应力状态对粗颗粒土静止侧压力系数影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 827-833.
[7] 周雄雄, 迟世春, 贾宇峰, 谢芸菲, . 高土石坝填筑过程的精细化模拟方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 443-450.
[8] 朱俊高,陆阳洋,蒋明杰,褚福永,. 新型静止侧压力系数试验仪的研制与应用[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3071-3076.
[9] 余 翔,孔宪京,邹德高,周晨光, . 覆盖层上土石坝非线性动力响应分析的地震波动输入方法[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1858-1866.
[10] 吴震宇,陈建康. 土坡体系可靠度分析方法及在高土石坝工程中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 699-704.
[11] 郭万里,朱俊高,余 挺,金 伟,. 土的连续级配方程在粗粒料中的应用[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3661-3667.
[12] 冷伍明 ,刘文劼 ,赵春彦 ,周文权 ,杨 奇 , . 重载铁路路基压实粗颗粒土填料动力破坏规律试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 640-646.
[13] 吴志伟 ,宋汉周,. 基于流-热耦合模型的土石坝渗流热监测研究[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 584-590.
[14] 陈仁朋 ,吴 进,亓 帅,王瀚霖,. 高铁路基粗颗粒土水力学参数测试方法研究[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3365-3372.
[15] 祝恩阳 ,姚仰平,. 结构性土UH模型[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3101-3110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[3] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[4] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[5] 马 亢,徐 进,吴赛钢,张爱辉. 公路隧道局部塌方洞段的围岩稳定性评价[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2955 -2960 .
[6] 刘振平,贺怀建,李 强,朱发华. 基于Python的三维建模可视化系统的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3037 -3042 .
[7] 杨 坤,周创兵,王同旭. 多种外界随机荷载综合作用下的坝坡风险评价[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3057 -3062 .
[8] 朱泽奇,盛 谦,梅松华,张占荣. 改进的遍布节理模型及其在层状岩体地下工程中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3115 -3121 .
[9] 尤红兵,赵凤新,李方杰. 层状场地中局部不均体对平面P波的散射[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3133 -3138 .
[10] 徐远杰,潘家军,刘祖德. 混凝土面板堆石坝的一种坝坡修整算法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3139 -3144 .