岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (3): 582-590.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0830

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于相似性原理超固结土不排水扩张半解析解

李镜培1, 2,刘耕云1, 2,周攀1, 2   

  1. 1. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-30 修回日期:2021-12-15 出版日期:2022-03-22 发布日期:2022-03-22
  • 通讯作者: 刘耕云,男,1993年生,博士研究生,主要从事桩基工程相关的工作。E-mail: liugengyunsdau@sina.com E-mail:lijp2773@tongji.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李镜培,男,1963年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事岩土力学及桩基础工程方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41972274)。

A semi-analytical solution for cavity undrained expansion in over-consolidated soils based on similarity transform theory

LI Jing-pei1, 2, LIU Geng-yun1, 2, ZHOU Pan1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2021-01-30 Revised:2021-12-15 Online:2022-03-22 Published:2022-03-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41972274).

摘要: 在实际工程中,土体往往因卸载、再加载等复杂应力路径而处于超固结状态,而现有的圆孔扩张问题的计算模型往往不能反映超固结土中剪胀、软化等一些特殊性质。为了解决这一问题,基于相似性原理和统一硬化(UH)模型,结合相关联的流动法则和大变形理论,采用相似求解技术求解了超固结土不排水扩张问题的半解析解答。通过理想化算例分析了圆孔扩张挤土产生的应力和孔压响应,并通过分析不同超固结比OCR的土体应力路径的变化规律,讨论了UH模型的适用性。结果表明:对于轻超固结土,空腔周围土体孔压在塑性区沿径向单调递减,随着OCR增大,塑性区内孔压分布呈现出“S”形的趋势,孔壁附近的孔压逐渐减小,孔壁周围甚至出现负孔压。随着OCR增大,压力?扩张曲线收敛变慢。在扩孔过程中正常固结土一直处于剪缩硬化阶段。而对于超固结土,土体则经历了临界状态→剪胀硬化阶段→临界(特征)状态→剪缩硬化阶段。该研究成果不仅丰富了相似求解技术的应用,而且为超固结土中桩基承载力、隧道围岩变形预测和原位测试参数等岩土工程问题的计算提供了理论依据。

关键词: 超固结土, 圆孔扩张理论, 相似性原理, UH模型, 半解析解

Abstract: Soils are often in an over-consolidated state due to complex stress paths such as unloading and reloading in practical engineering and the existing models for the cavity expansion problem fail to reflect the dilatancy and softening characteristics of over-consolidated soils. To this end, a semi-analytical solution for cavity undrained expansion in over-consolidated soils based on UH model was solved by using similarity solving technique in combination with associated flow rule and large strain theory. The response of stress and excess pore-water pressure caused by compaction effect was analyzed and the applicability of UH model was discussed by analyzing the variation of soil stress path with different over-consolidation ratios (OCR). The results, including the stress distributions curves, the expansion-pressure curves, effective stress path and yield locus variation curves and the evolution of the potential strength during cavity expansion, shows that: (1) For the lightly over-consolidated, the excess pore-water pressure decreases monotonously along the radial direction in the plastic zone in which the pressure curve presents a "S" shaped trend and decreases gradually around the cavity, particularly negative pore pressure appears around the pore wall, with the increase of OCR. (2) With the increase of OCR, the convergence of pressure-expansion curves becomes slower. (3) In the process of the cavity expansion, the normally consolidated soil is always in the stage of contraction and hardening. While for the over-consolidated, it goes through critical state to dilatancy and hardening stage to critical state to shear contraction and hardening one. This paper not only enriches the application of similarity solving technique, but also provides a reference for calculation of bearing capacity of pile foundation in over-consolidated soil, prediction for surrounding rock deformation of tunnels and determination of in-situ test parameters.

Key words: over-consolidated soils, cavity expansion theory, similarity transform theory, UH model, semi-analytical solution

中图分类号: 

  • TU441
[1] 胡安峰, 周禹杉, 陈缘, 夏长青, 谢康和, . 结构性土一维非线性大应变固结半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2583-2591.
[2] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[3] 蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[4] 朱俊高, 赵晓龙, 何顺宾, 田雨, . UH模型对粗颗粒土适用性验证及土石坝工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3873-3881.
[5] 姚仰平, 黄建, 张奎, 崔光祖. 机场高填方蠕变沉降的数值反演预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3395-3404.
[6] 王秋生, 周济兵. 基于广义热力学的超固结土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4178-4184.
[7] 汪 磊,李林忠,徐永福,夏小和,孙德安,. 半透水边界下分数阶黏弹性饱和土一维固结特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4142-4148.
[8] 张 浩,石名磊,郭院成,李永辉,. 边载作用下桥梁基桩-立柱的位移特征与受力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2683-2692.
[9] 解 益,李培超,汪 磊,孙德安,. 分数阶导数黏弹性饱和土体一维固结半解析解[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3240-3246.
[10] 李传勋,徐 超,谢康和,. 考虑非达西渗流和应力历史的土体非线性固结研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 91-100.
[11] 秦爱芳,张九龙. 考虑渗透系数变化的非饱和土固结性状分析[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1521-1528.
[12] 祝恩阳 ,姚仰平,. 结构性土UH模型[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3101-3110.
[13] 凌道盛 ,王 筠 ,单振东 ,丁皓江 , . 单层非饱和多孔介质一维瞬态响应半解析解[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 25-34.
[14] 申林方 ,王志良 ,谢建斌 . 基于边界配点法浅埋隧道开挖引起 周围土体变形的分析 [J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 297-301.
[15] 周 扬,周国庆. 土体一维冻结问题温度场半解析解[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 309-0313.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .