不同地应力测试方法在三山岛金矿2 005 m
竖井建井区域的应用及其地应力分布规律研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1172

岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 1093-1104.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1172

不同地应力测试方法在三山岛金矿2 005 m 竖井建井区域的应用及其地应力分布规律研究

侯奎奎^{1, 2}，吴钦正^{1, 2}，张凤鹏³，彭超^{1, 2}，刘焕新^{1, 2}，刘兴全^{1, 2}

1. 山东黄金集团有限公司深井开采实验室，山东莱州 261400；2. 山东黄金集团有限公司山东省深海深地金属矿智能开采重点实验室，山东济南 250000；3. 东北大学深部金属矿安全开采教育部重点实验室，辽宁沈阳 110819

收稿日期:2021-07-30 修回日期:2021-11-29 出版日期:2022-04-15 发布日期:2022-04-18
作者简介:侯奎奎，男，1991年生，硕士，初级工程师，主要从事岩石力学试验与地压监测相关研究。
基金资助:
山东省重大科技创新工程（No. 2019SDZY05)

Application of different in-situ stress test methods in the area of 2 005 m shaft construction of Sanshandao gold mine and distribution law of in-situ stress

HOU Kui-kui^{1, 2}, WU Qin-zheng^{1, 2}, ZHANG Feng-peng³, PENG Chao^{1, 2}, LIU Huan-xin^{1, 2}, LIU Xing-quan^{1, 2}

1. Deep Mining Laboratory of Shandong Gold Group Co., Ltd., Laizhou, Shandong 261400, China; 2. Shandong Key Laboratory of Deep-sea and Deep-earth Metallic Mineral Intelligent Mining, Shandong Gold Group Co. Ltd., Jinan, Shandong 250000, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal Mines, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, China

Received:2021-07-30 Revised:2021-11-29 Online:2022-04-15 Published:2022-04-18
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Major Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2019SDZY05).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 地应力对地下工程安全施工及长期稳定性是极其重要的。运用声发射法、非弹性恢复（ASR）法、水压致裂法对三山岛金矿西岭矿区2 005 m竖井工程勘察区域进行地应力测量，获取了其地应力分布规律及其异常区域，并分析了不同地应力测试方法的测试原理、适用条件及测试结果的差异性。结果表明：不同埋深水平最大主应力始终为第一主应力；当埋深增加到一定程度后，第二主应力发生转换，由最小水平主应力转变为垂直主应力；声发射法测量结果表明，第三主应力Kaiser效应点与ASR法、水压致裂法测试结果存在较大差异；分析了?H/?v、?h /?v、?H /?h随埋深的变化趋势（?H为水平最大主应力，?h为水平最小主应力，?v为垂直主应力），并对测试区域地应力异常区域进行了圈定。上述分析为竖井的设计、施工及长期稳定性提供了有效的数据支撑。

关键词: 水压致裂法, 非弹性恢复法, 声发射法, 地应力测量

Abstract: In-situ stress is highly important to the safe construction and long-term stability of underground engineering. Acoustic emission method, inelastic recovery method (ASR in short) and hydraulic fracturing method are applied to measure the in-situ stress in the area of 2 005 m shaft construction of Xiling of Sanshandao gold mine. The distribution law of in-situ stress and its abnormal area are obtained, and the principle and application conditions of different in-situ stress testing methods are briefly described. The results show that the horizontal maximum principal stress at different buried depths is always the major principal stress. Meanwhile, when the buried depth increases to a certain extent, the second principal stress changes from the horizontal minimum principal stress to the vertical principal stress. In addition, the results of AE measurement show that the Kaiser effect point of the third principal stress is different from those of ASR and hydraulic fracturing. Furthermore, the variation trends of ?H/?v, ?h /?v and ?H /?h with buried depth are analyzed, and the abnormal area of in-situ stress in the test area is delineated. The study could provide effective data support for the design, construction and long-term stability of the shaft.

Key words: hydraulic fracturing method, inelastic strain recovery method, acoustic emission method, in-situ stress measurement

中图分类号:

TU 452

侯奎奎, 吴钦正, 张凤鹏, 彭超, 刘焕新, 刘兴全, . 不同地应力测试方法在三山岛金矿2 005 m 竖井建井区域的应用及其地应力分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1093-1104.

HOU Kui-kui, WU Qin-zheng, ZHANG Feng-peng, PENG Chao, LIU Huan-xin, LIU Xing-quan, . Application of different in-situ stress test methods in the area of 2 005 m shaft construction of Sanshandao gold mine and distribution law of in-situ stress[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(4): 1093-1104.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王川婴, 王益腾, 韩增强, 汪进超, 邹先坚, 胡胜, . 基于钻孔形态分析的地应力测量方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 549-556.
[2]	王璞, 王成虎, 杨汝华, 侯正阳, 王洪, . 基于应力多边形与震源机制解的深部岩体应力状态预测方法初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4486-4496.
[3]	钟山，江权，冯夏庭，刘继光，李邵军，邱士利，吴世勇，. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
[4]	王成虎，邢博瑞，. 原生裂隙水压致裂原地应力测量的理论与实践新进展[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1289-1297.
[5]	朱元广，刘泉声，蒋景东，薛俊华，. 三向压力盒的嵌入效应及其应力测量特性模拟[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2728-2736.
[6]	王海军，汤雷，任旭华，杨安玉，牛岩,. 低应力区岩石变形记忆效应形成机制及失忆性[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1007-1014.
[7]	张鹏，秦向辉，丰成君，孙炜锋，谭成轩 . 郯庐断裂带山东段深孔地应力测量及其现今活动性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2329-2336.
[8]	丰成君，陈群策，谭成轩，吴满路，秦向辉. 广东核电站地应力测量及其应用[J]. , 2013, 34(6): 1745-1752.
[9]	张重远，吴满路，廖椿庭 . 金川三矿地应力测量及应力状态特征研究[J]. , 2013, 34(11): 3254-3260.
[10]	刘泉声，刘恺德. 淮南矿区深部地应力场特征研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2089-2096.
[11]	康红普，林健，张晓，吴拥政. 潞安矿区井下地应力测量及分布规律研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 827-831.
[12]	王成虎，郭啟良，丁立丰，刘立鹏. 工程区高地应力判据研究及实例分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2359-2364.
[13]	张百红，韩立军，韩贵雷，王延宁 . 深部三维地应力实测与巷道稳定性研究[J]. , 2008, 29(9): 2547-2550.
[14]	沈海超，程远方，王京印，赵益忠，张建国. 断层扰动下地应力场三维有限元约束优化反演[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 359-365.
[15]	韩昌瑞，白世伟，张波. 正交各向异性岩体孔径变形法的二维地应力分析方法改进[J]. , 2007, 28(11): 2249-2253.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

不同地应力测试方法在三山岛金矿2 005 m 竖井建井区域的应用及其地应力分布规律研究

Application of different in-situ stress test methods in the area of 2 005 m shaft construction of Sanshandao gold mine and distribution law of in-situ stress

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10