岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1727-1737.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1592

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

动力扰动作用下多功能岩石结构面剪切 试验装置研制与应用研究

崔国建1, 2,张传庆1, 2,周辉1, 2,卢景景1, 2,高阳1, 2, 胡明明1, 2,胡大伟1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-18 修回日期:2022-03-07 出版日期:2022-06-21 发布日期:2022-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 张传庆,男,1977年生,博士,研究员,主要从事深部岩石力学与深部灾害调控等方面的研究工作。E-mail: cqzhang@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:gjcui@whrsm.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:崔国建,男,1992年生,博士,助理研究员,主要从事深部工程断层活化致灾机制与灾害防控等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.U1865203,No.52109142,No.41941018);中国科学院科技服务网络计划(STS计划)项目(No.KFJ-STS-QYZD-174)。

Development and application of multifunctional shear test apparatus for rock discontinuity under dynamic disturbance loading

CUI Guo-jian1, 2, ZHANG Chuan-qing1, 2, ZHOU Hui1, 2, LU Jing-jing1, 2, GAO Yang1, 2, HU Ming-ming1, 2, HU Da-wei1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2021-09-18 Revised:2022-03-07 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U1865203, 52109142, 41941018) and the Science and Technology Service Network Initiative, CAS(KFJ-STS-QYZD-174).

摘要: 动力扰动是导致岩石结构面滑动失稳进而触发地震、岩爆等强动力型地质灾害的重要诱因。为研究动力扰动作用下岩石结构面力学响应及其活化致灾机制,自主研制了动力扰动作用下多功能岩石结构面剪切试验装置。该装置主要包括用于施加准静态荷载、多种法向边界条件、复杂波形宽频率动力扰动荷载(0.5~50 Hz)及宽频剪切速率(0.000 1~10 mm/s)的法向和切向加载系统,施加冲击动力扰动荷载的摆锤冲击系统,开展循环往复剪切试验的剪切盒,数据采集和控制系统。通过控制软件编程,可开展不同剪切速率下恒定法向荷载、恒定法向刚度、卸法向荷载、变法向刚度和动态法向荷载条件下岩石结构面单调或循环剪切试验,静载叠加动载剪切试验,速率和应力阶跃试验和摆锤冲击剪切试验等。应用该装置开展了初步的试验研究,验证了试验过程中该装置具有良好的稳定性和准确性。该装置的研发对认识动力扰动作用下岩石结构面的响应特征,深入理解地震、岩爆等强动力型地质灾害的岩石结构面活化失稳触发效应及致灾机制具有重要的科学意义和工程价值。

关键词: 岩石结构面, 动力扰动, 阶跃试验, 地震监测预报

Abstract: Dynamic disturbance is an important influence factor that causes the sliding instability of rock discontinuity and then triggers strong dynamic geological disasters, such as earthquake and rock burst. In order to study the mechanical response and disaster-causing mechanism of rock discontinuity under dynamic disturbance loading, a multifunctional shear test apparatus for rock discontinuity under dynamic disturbance loading (DDST-1800) is independently developed. The test apparatus is composed of normal and shear loading units with quasi-static loading, varied normal boundary conditions, dynamic disturbance loading with complex and wide-frequency waveform (0.5−50 Hz), and wide-range shear velocity loading (0.000 1−10 mm/s) functions, pendulum impact system, cyclic shear box unit, data acquisition and control units. The servo-controlled apparatus DDST-1800 can conduct the following typical tests by programmed operations: monotonic or cyclic direct shear test of rock discontinuity under constant normal load (CNL), constant normal stiffness (CNS), unloading normal load (UNL), variable normal stiffness (VNS), and dynamic normal load (DNL) boundary conditions with different shear velocities, superimposed dynamic disturbance shear test, velocity and stress step tests, and pendulum hammer-driven impact test of rock discontinuity under pre-set normal and shear stress conditions. Preliminary experimental studies were carried out and the results verified the stability and accuracy of the new apparatus. The research and development of the new apparatus has important scientific significance and engineering value for clarifying the dynamic response characteristics of rock discontinuity under dynamic disturbance, and deeply understanding the triggering effect of activation instability of rock discontinuity and disaster-causing mechanism of geological disasters such as earthquake and rock burst.

Key words: rock discontinuity, dynamic disturbance, velocity and stress step test, earthquake monitoring and prediction

中图分类号: 

  • TU415
[1] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[2] 吴秋红, 赵伏军, 王世鸣, 周志华, 王 斌, 李 玉, . 动力扰动下全长黏结锚杆的力学响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 942-950.
[3] 宋磊博,江 权,李元辉,杨成祥,钟 山,张妹珠,. 不同采样间隔下结构面形貌特征和各向异性特征的统计参数稳定性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1121-1132.
[4] 宋磊博,江 权,李元辉,杨成祥,冉曙光,王百林,刘 挺,. 基于剪切行为结构面形貌特征的描述[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 525-533.
[5] 唐礼忠,程露萍,王 春,舒计步,武建力,陈 源. 高静载条件下受频繁动力扰动时蛇纹岩动力学特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2737-2745.
[6] 罗战友 ,杜时贵 ,黄 曼,. 岩石结构面粗糙度系数尺寸效应的推拉试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3381-3386.
[7] 周 辉,胡善超,卢景景,张传庆. 板裂体组合条件下岩爆倾向性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 1-7.
[8] 黄 曼 ,罗战友 ,杜时贵 ,张晓莺 . 系列尺度岩石结构面相似表面模型制作的逆向控制技术研究[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 1211-1216.
[9] 韩立军,宗义江,韩贵雷,张后全. 岩石结构面注浆加固抗剪特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2570-2576.
[10] 左宇军,李术才,秦泗凤,李利平. 动力扰动诱发承压水底板关键层失稳的突变理论研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2361-2366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .