岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1717-1726.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1609

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于CT三维重建的注水煤岩体裂隙扩展规律研究

毛彦军1,陈曦1, 2,范超男1,葛少成1,李文璞1   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 安全与应急管理工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 太原理工大学 材料科学与工程学院,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-21 修回日期:2022-04-29 出版日期:2022-06-21 发布日期:2022-06-30
  • 通讯作者: 陈曦,男,1987年生,博士,副教授,主要从事矿井通风与粉尘防治方面的研究。E-mail: chenxi01@tyut.edu.cn E-mail:maoyanjun0690@link.tyut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:毛彦军,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事煤岩渗流力学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.52174195,No.51804211);山西省基础研究计划(自由探索类)面上项目(No.20210302123122);山西省应用基础研究计划(No.201901D211037)

Crack network evolution of water injection coal and rock mass by means of 3D reconstruction

MAO Yan-jun1, CHEN Xi1, 2, FAN Chao-nan1, GE Shao-cheng1, LI Wen-pu1   

  1. 1. College of Safety and Emergency Management Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2021-09-21 Revised:2022-04-29 Online:2022-06-21 Published:2022-06-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(52174195, 51804211), the General Project of Shanxi Basic Research Program (Free Exploration) (20210302123122) and the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi(201901D211037).

摘要: 针对煤层注水防尘过程中注水压力设置不合理、注水渗流效果差等问题,采用CT扫描技术与RFPA软件相结合的方法,构建了可以表征注水煤岩体内部孔裂隙结构的三维细观非均匀渗流损伤数值模型。通过对经过CT三维重构的煤岩模型进行不同注水压力的渗流损伤模拟,研究了煤层注水压力对煤样的渗流破坏、渗透率演化及声发射特性变化的影响;并通过对重构的煤岩模型进行缩放处理,研究了煤岩尺寸对煤样的渗流破坏和声发射变化的影响。研究结果表明:在煤样微观裂隙扩展过程中,随着注水压力的递增,煤样损伤单元数、渗流运动的渗流场分布范围、渗透率、声发射数目和能量总体呈上升趋势,局部范围内有波动发生,发生波动的原因是由于渗流运动的渗流场与煤样裂隙内部应力场发生临界反应,致使煤样破坏单元位置发生改变;煤样渗透率由3.82×10−5 μm2上升至0.314 μm2,孔隙率由5.45%上升至48.45%,揭示了煤岩体裂隙总体上随注水压力增大而不断扩展贯通,局部上随注水压力增大而扩展趋势有所下降的影响规律;随着煤样尺寸的增加,注水破坏后煤样的孔隙率呈现先下降后逐渐平稳的趋势,声发射特性变化趋势正好与之相反,表明煤样的尺寸对注水煤岩渗流破坏有显著影响,但当煤样尺寸超过40 mm时,煤样尺寸对注水煤岩渗流破坏的影响趋于稳定。CT扫描技术与RFPA软件相结合的方法能够有效模拟注水煤岩的裂隙渗流扩展行为。

关键词: 煤层注水, 裂隙扩展, 渗透率, 尺寸效应

Abstract: In view of the unreasonable setting of water injection pressure and poor water injection seepage effect in the process of coal seam water infusion and dust prevention, a three-dimensional meso non-uniform seepage damage numerical model which can characterize the internal pore and fracture structure of water injection coal and rock mass is constructed by using the method of CT scanning technology and RFPA software. Through the seepage damage simulation of coal rock model reconstructed by CT with different water injection pressures, the influence of water injection pressure on the seepage damage permeability, evolution and acoustic emission characteristics of coal rock sample was studied. The effect of coal rock size on seepage damage and acoustic emission of coal rock samples is studied by scaling the reconstructed coal rock model. The results show that in the process of micro fracture propagation of coal sample, with the increase of water injection pressure, the number of damage units, seepage movement distribution range of seepage field, permeability, acoustic emission number and energy of coal sample generally show an upward trend, and there are fluctuations in local area. The reason for the fluctuation is the critical reaction between the seepage field and the internal stress field of coal sample fracture, resulting in the change of the position of coal sample failure unit. The permeability of coal samples increases from 3.82×10−5 μm2 to 0.314 μm2, and the porosity increases from 5.45% to 48.45%, which reveals the influence law that the fractures of coal and rock mass continue to expand and penetrate with the increase of water injection pressure on the whole, and the expansion trend decreases with the increase of water injection pressure on the part. With the increase of coal sample size, the porosity of the coal sample after the water injection failure shows a trend of first decreasing and then gradually stabilizing, and the change trend of acoustic emission characteristic is just the opposite, indicating that the coal sample size has a significant impact on the water injection coal rock seepage failure. However, the impact of the coal sample size on the water injection coal rock seepage failure tends to be stable when the coal sample size exceeds 40 mm. The combination of CT scanning technology and RFPA software can effectively simulate the fracture seepage propagation behavior of water injection coal and rock.

Key words: coal seam water infusion, fracture expansion, permeability, size effect

中图分类号: 

  • X964
[1] 闫世豪, 迟世春, 王晋伟, 郭宇, 周新杰, . 考虑微裂纹随机分布的堆石颗粒准静态强度统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1378-1387.
[2] 朱晶, 裴强强, 郭青林, 张博, . 基于尺寸效应的夯土水盐运移分布特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1481-1494.
[3] 华涛, 申林方, 王志良, 李泽, 徐则民. 基于近场动力学的岩石水力压裂数值模拟及裂隙网络定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 612-622.
[4] 罗国立, 张科, 齐飞飞, 朱辉, 张凯, 刘享华, . 基于3D打印的裂隙岩体力学特性尺寸效应及各向异性初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 107-116.
[5] 甘磊, 刘玉, 张宗亮, 沈振中, 马洪影, . 岩体裂隙粗糙度表征及其对裂隙渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1585-1592.
[6] 赵艳, 杨柳, 奚茹茹, 耿振坤, 张谦, 马雄德, . 基于核磁共振和磁共振成像的低渗透岩芯CO2-H2O两相驱替特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1636-1644.
[7] 马国良, 陈曦, 范超男, 葛少成. 不同水力荷载路径下煤体微观渗流特征及宏观破坏研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1779-1788.
[8] 冷先伦, 王川, 盛谦, 宋文军, 陈健, 张占荣, 陈菲, . 基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1283-1294.
[9] 杨忠平, 李进, 刘浩宇, 张益铭, 刘新荣, . 土石混合体−基岩界面剪切力学特性块石尺寸效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 965-974.
[10] 王川, 冷先伦, 张占荣, 杨闯, 陈健, . 基于裂隙扩展的多级岩质边坡 开挖卸荷破坏路径分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1190-1203.
[11] 周航, 吴晗, 曾少华, . 基于应变梯度理论的砂土中扩孔闭合解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 757-770.
[12] KOZHEVNIKOV V. Evgenii, TURBAKOV S. Mikhail, RIABOKON P. Evgenii, GLADKIKH A. Evgeniy, POPLYGIN V. Vladimir, GUZEV A. Mikhail, . 基于现场试井数据和岩心驱替试验的采油初期渗透率演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 834-842.
[13] 王刚, 冯净, 陈雪畅, 闫松, 李胜鹏, . 基于物化特性的煤层注水难易程度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 144-154.
[14] 蒋长宝, 余塘, 魏文辉, 段敏克, 杨阳, 魏财, . 加卸载应力作用下煤岩渗透率演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 13-22.
[15] 田佳丽, 王惠民, 刘星星, 向雷, 盛金昌, 罗玉龙, 詹美礼. 考虑不同尺度孔隙压缩敏感性的 砂岩渗透特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 405-415.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] 温世亿,李静,苏霞,姚雄. 复杂应力条件下围岩破坏的细观特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] 刘 杰,李建林,屈建军,陈 星,李剑武,骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[5] 蒋臻蔚,彭建兵,王启耀. 西安市地铁3号线不良地质问题及对策研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 317 -321 .
[6] 李兴高,刘维宁. 挡土结构上水-土压力分算的进一步探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 419 -424 .
[7] 祝 磊,洪宝宁. 粉状煤系土的物理力学特性[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1317 -1322 .
[8] 周春梅,章泽军,徐大杰,王生维,李先福. 古构造应力场数值模拟及危险性预测研究[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2141 -2146 .
[9] 孙长帅,杨海巍,徐光黎. 岩石锚杆基础抗拔承载力计算方法探究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 75 -78 .
[10] 蔡 枫,郑永来. 土钉墙数值模拟在干船坞坞墙中应用探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 560 -564 .