大厚度黄土地基,浸水试验,湿陷变形,地区修正系数β0,水分扩散,土中竖向应力 ," /> 大厚度黄土地基,浸水试验,湿陷变形,地区修正系数β0,水分扩散,土中竖向应力 ,"/> large-thickness loess foundation,water immersion test,collapse deformation,regional correction coefficient β0,water diffusion,vertical stress in soil ,"/> 靖远地区大厚度黄土地基浸水湿陷过程及土中竖向应力特征试验研究

岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 268-278.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0266

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

靖远地区大厚度黄土地基浸水湿陷过程及土中竖向应力特征试验研究

刘德仁1,安政山1,徐硕昌1,王旭1, 2,张转军1,金芯1,张严1   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070; 2. 兰州交通大学 道桥工程灾害防治技术国家地方联合工程实验室,甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-28 接受日期:2022-04-25 出版日期:2023-01-16 发布日期:2023-01-13
  • 通讯作者: 安政山,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事黄土湿陷性方面的研究。E-mail: 2805877360@qq.com E-mail:liuderen@mail.lzjtu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘德仁,男,1978年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,从事岩土工程及特殊土与寒区工程相关的教学与研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41662017)。

Experimental study on immersion collapsibility process and vertical stress characteristics of large thickness loess foundation in Jingyuan area

LIU De-ren1, AN Zheng-shan1, XU Shuo-chang1, WANG Xu1, 2, ZHANG Zhuan-jun1, JIN Xin1, ZHANG Yan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. National and Provincial Joint Engineering Laboratory of Load & Bridge Disaster Prevention and Control, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • Received:2022-03-28 Accepted:2022-04-25 Online:2023-01-16 Published:2023-01-13
  • Supported by:
    This word was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41662017).

摘要:

为了研究靖远大厚度黄土在浸水条件下的水分入渗规律和自重湿陷变形特征,在中兰铁路沿线的靖远北站黄土自重湿陷场地进行了不打注水孔的现场浸水试验,监测并分析了地表及地下湿陷变形、试坑周围裂缝、含水率和土中竖向应力变化情况,对水分扩散规律、自重湿陷特性和土中竖向应力变化规律进行了研究,并对地区修正系数β0值和浸润角进行了探讨。结果表明:体积含水率变化分为浸水稳定(2个)、快速增加(1个)和缓慢增加(1个)共4个阶段;浸水过程中,水分在21 m处竖向入渗加快、径向扩散减缓,湿润峰最终形态呈现为椭圆状。根据探井和钻孔含水率测试结果,推算出浸润角最大为41°。该场地黄土自重湿陷过程历经剧烈湿陷、缓慢湿陷和固结稳定3个阶段。试验结束时共计发展了13圈环状裂缝,裂缝最远处距试坑边缘26 m。根据室内试验和现场测试结果,建议地区修正系数沿土层深度进行修正,0~10 m内β0值取1.05,10~27 m内β0值取0.95。在地表至21 m深度范围内,地基土浸水饱和且湿陷充分,土中竖向应力沿深度呈线性增加,土中竖向应力接近饱和自重应力,21 m以下的地基土未能充分湿陷,土中竖向应力逐渐减小。该研究成果可应用于中兰铁路后期的建设,并为该地区其他工程建设提供参考。

关键词: 大厚度黄土地基')">

大厚度黄土地基, 浸水试验, 湿陷变形, 地区修正系数β0, 水分扩散, 土中竖向应力

Abstract:

 In order to study the water infiltration and self-weight collapse deformation characteristics of Jingyuan loess with large thickness under the condition of immersion, a field immersion test without water injection holes was carried out in the self-weight collapse loess site of Jingyuan North Station along the Zhongwei-Lanzhou Railway. The surface and underground collapsible deformation, cracks, water content and vertical stress in the soil around the test pit were monitored and analyzed. The water diffusion, self-weight collapsible characteristics and vertical stress in the soil were studied, and the regional correction coefficient β0 value and wetting angle were discussed. The results showed that: the change of volumetric water content was divided into four stages: immersion stability (2), rapid increase (1) and slow increase (1). In the immersion process, the vertical infiltration of water was accelerated and the radial diffusion was slowed down at 21 m, and the final shape of the wetting front was presented as elliptical. According to the water content test results of exploratory wells and boreholes, the maximum wetting angle was calculated to be 41°. The self-weight collapse process of loess in the site went through three stages: severe collapsibility, slow collapsibility and consolidation stabilization. At the end of the test, a total of 13 ring cracks were developed, and the farthest point of the cracks was  26 m from the edge of the test pit. According to the indoor test and field test results, it was suggested that the regional correction coefficient should be corrected along the depth of the soil layer, and the β0 value was taken as 1.05 within 0−10 m and 0.95 within 10−27 m. In the depth range from the surface to 21 m, the foundation soil was saturated and fully collapsed. The vertical stress in the soil increased linearly along the depth, and the vertical stress in the soil was close to the saturated self-weight stress. The foundation soil below 21 m failed to collapse entirely, and the vertical stress in the soil decreased gradually. The research results could be applied to the later construction of Zhongwei-Lanzhou Railway and provide a reference for other regional engineering projects.

Key words: large-thickness loess foundation')">

large-thickness loess foundation, water immersion test, collapse deformation, regional correction coefficient β0, water diffusion, vertical stress in soil

中图分类号: 

  • TU 444
[1] 蒋小虎, 黄跃廷, 胡海军, 陈铄, 陈锐, 王崇华, 汪慧, 康顺祥, . 基于原位双环、试坑浸水试验和数值模拟反演的Q3黄土饱和渗透系数对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 2941-2951.
[2] 朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合 管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[3] 姚志华, 陈正汉, 方祥位, 黄雪峰, . 非饱和原状黄土弹塑性损伤流固耦 合模型及其初步应用 [J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 216-226.
[4] 姚志华,连 杰,陈正汉,朱元青,方祥位,. 考虑细观结构演化的非饱和Q3 原状黄土弹塑性本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1553-1563.
[5] 安 鹏,张爱军,邢义川,倪万魁,张 博,. 伊犁深厚湿陷性黄土浸水入渗及沉降变形特征分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 557-564.
[6] 黄雪峰 ,杨校辉 ,殷 鹤 ,刘自龙 ,周俊鹏,. 湿陷性黄土场地湿陷下限深度与桩基中性点位置关系研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 296-302.
[7] 邵生俊,杨春鸣,马秀婷,陆 斯. 黄土的独立物性指标及其与湿陷性参数的相关性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 27-34.
[8] 黄雪峰 ,杨校辉,. 湿陷性黄土现场浸水试验研究进展[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 222-228.
[9] 朱彦鹏 ,赵天时 ,陈长流 , . 桩基负摩阻力沿桩长变化的试验研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 265-272.
[10] 刘争宏,郑建国. 桩基内力长期监测中的蠕变影响分析[J]. , 2013, 34(5): 1391-1396.
[11] 米海珍,杨 鹏. 挤密桩处理湿陷性黄土地基的现场试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 1951-1956.
[12] 张 明,张虎元,贾灵艳. 混合型缓冲回填材料非饱和水分扩散试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1673-1678.
[13] 武小鹏 ,熊治文 ,王小军 ,屈耀辉 . 郑西高速铁路豫西段黄土现场浸水自重湿陷特征研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1769-1773.
[14] 黄雪峰 ,张广平 ,姚志华 ,张建华. 大厚度自重湿陷性黄土湿陷变形特性水分入渗规律及地基处理方法研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 100-108.
[15] 李加贵,陈正汉,黄雪峰,李 佳. 原状非饱和Q3黄土的土压力原位测试和强度特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 433-440.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 况雨春,伍开松,杨迎新,马德坤. 三牙轮钻头破岩过程计算机仿真模型[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 235 -238 .
[2] 鄢治华,刘志伟,刘厚健. 黄河阶地上某电厂高边坡参数选取及其工程治理[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 465 -468 .
[3] 许振浩 ,李术才 ,李利平 ,侯建刚 ,隋 斌 ,石少帅. 基于层次分析法的岩溶隧道突水突泥风险评估[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1757 -1766 .
[4] 江 权 ,冯夏庭 ,周 辉 ,赵 阳 ,徐鼎平 ,黄 可 ,江亚丽. 层间错动带的强度参数取值探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3379 -3386 .
[5] 温世清 ,刘汉龙 ,陈育民. 浆固碎石桩单桩荷载传递特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3637 -3641 .
[6] 李顺群 ,高凌霞 ,柴寿喜. 冻土力学性质影响因素的显著性和交互作用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1173 -1177 .
[7] 钟 声 ,王川婴 ,吴立新 ,唐新建 ,王清远. 点状不良地质体钻孔雷达响应特征 ——围岩及充填效应正演分析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1191 -1195 .
[8] 孟 振,陈锦剑,王建华,尹振宇. 砂土中螺纹桩承载特性的模型试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 141 -145 .
[9] 罗 刚 ,胡卸文 ,顾成壮 . 强震作用下顺层岩质斜坡动力失稳机制及启动速度研究[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 483 -490 .
[10] 付晓东,盛 谦,张勇慧. 水电站地下洞室群分步开挖的非连续变形分析[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 568 -574 .