岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 1645-1656.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0983

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同沉降方式下埋地管道力学响应试验研究

张玉1,梁昊1,林亮2,周游2,赵青松3   

  1. 1. 中国石油大学(华东) 储运与建筑工程学院,山东 青岛 266580;2. 青岛融合桥头堡开发有限公司,山东 青岛 266500; 3. 山东京博控股集团有限公司,山东 滨州 256599
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-28 接受日期:2022-11-30 出版日期:2023-06-14 发布日期:2023-06-14
  • 通讯作者: 梁昊,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事海洋岩土工程、陆地风电基础工程方面研究。E-mail: 1072139393@qq.com E-mail:zhangyu@upc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张玉,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,主要从事能源岩土力学与工程研究方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51890914,No.52179119);山东省自然科学基金(No.ZR2019MEEO01);山西省自然科学基金(No.2021JM-373)。

Experimental study on the mechanical response of buried pipelines under different subsidence patterns

ZHANG Yu1, LIANG Hao1, LIN Liang2, ZHOU You2, ZHAO Qing-song3   

  1. 1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China; 2. Qingdao Fusion Bridgehead Development Co., Ltd., Qingdao, Shandong 266500, China; 3. Chambroad Holding Group, Binzhou, Shandong 256599, China
  • Received:2022-06-28 Accepted:2022-11-30 Online:2023-06-14 Published:2023-06-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51890914, 52179119), the Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation (ZR2019MEEO01) and the Provincial National Science Foundation of Shanxi (2021JM-373).

摘要: 地层塌陷和沉降引发的埋地管道事故频发,亟需开展不同沉降作用下力学响应试验研究。针对地层塌陷和沉降作用下油气埋地管道的管周应变、土压力和土体变形开展了系统研究。研究发现:地层塌陷和沉降过程中,受管顶土拱效应影响,管道应变及土压力随塌陷区扩展先增大后减小,随沉降区扩展而增大,塌陷和沉降区内,管道沿轴向呈两端凸起、中间下凹的“马鞍形”;管道变形受沉降影响更为显著,当塌陷和沉降量均为50 mm时,与地层塌陷相比,管道在沉降过程中顶部、底部和中部的最大应变值分别增加了18.8%、249%和273%;对比管周土压力增大和减小区域的面积之比 λ 可知,地层沉降较塌陷 λ 提高了78%,因此,管道在地层沉降过程中承受更大的作用力。基于修正Marston土压力计算模型,提出了地层沉降过程中管顶竖向土压力计算方法,并采用模型试验结果验证了该方法的准确性。

关键词: 油气管道, 地层塌陷, 地层沉降, 管道应变, 管周土压力

Abstract: The frequent occurrence of buried pipeline accidents caused by the ground collapse and subsidence makes it urgent to carry out experimental studies on the mechanical response under different subsidence effects. A systematical survey of the pipeline strain, earth pressure and soil deformation was conducted considering the effects of ground subsidence and collapse. The result showed that due to the arching effect at the top of the pipeline, the strain and earth pressure firstly increased and then decreased with the extension of the collapse zone, while they increased as the subsidence zone extended during the collapse and settlement. In the subsidence and collapse zones, the pipeline along the axial direction exhibited a saddle shape with both ends convex and concave in the middle. Pipeline deformation was more significantly affected by the subsidence. When the subsidence and collapse were both 50 mm, the maximum strain at the top, bottom and middle of the pipeline increased by approximately 18.8%, 249% and 273% compared to the ground collapse, respectively. It could be seen by comparing the ratio of the increasing area to the decreasing area of earth pressure around the pipeline λ that λ in the subsidence was increased by 78% compared with that in the collapse; therefore, the pipeline was subjected to larger earth pressure during the subsidence. Based on the modified Marston calculation model, a method for predicting the vertical earth pressure during ground subsidence was proposed, and the accuracy of the method was verified using the model test results.

Key words: pipeline, ground subsidence, soil collapse, pipeline strain, earth pressure around the pipeline

中图分类号: 

  • TE832
[1] 张治国, 陈杰, 朱正国, 魏纲, 吴钟腾, 陈仲侃, . 考虑盾构铰接作用的小半径曲线隧道开挖诱发地层沉降分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1165-1178.
[2] 赵留园, 单治钢, 汪明元, . 地震作用下南黄海海上风电场水 平场地液化特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 169-180.
[3] 赵智涛 ,刘 军 ,王 霆 ,刘继尧,. 地铁暗挖施工引起的管线与地层沉降关系研究[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1159-1166.
[4] 夏元友 ,陈春舒 ,BAKRI Mudthir ,王智德 ,周 雄,. 浅埋隧道开挖引起的土体水平位移分析[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 354-360.
[5] 安建永 ,项彦勇 ,贾永州,. 既有桩基荷载对邻近浅埋隧道开挖效应及支护内力影响的研究[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 926-932.
[6] 周志芳 ,朱宏高 ,陈静 ,钟建驰 ,吉林 ,冯兆祥,. 深基坑降水与沉降的非线性耦合计算[J]. , 2004, 25(12): 1984-1988.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .