岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 502-510.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0311

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于触发式黏塑性元件的黏性土黏弹塑性动本构模型

赵程斌,骆亚生,范全,孟智田,孙哲   

  1. 西北农林科技大学 水利与建筑工程学院,陕西 杨凌 712100
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-13 接受日期:2023-07-28 出版日期:2024-02-11 发布日期:2024-02-07
  • 通讯作者: 骆亚生,男,1967年生,博士,教授,主要从事黄土力学与工程方面的生产与科研工作。E-mail: lyas1967@nwsuaf.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵程斌,男,1998年生,硕士研究生,主要从事黄土及其工程性质的研究。2253829117@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(No. 2021JLM-51)

Viscoelastic-plastic dynamic constitutive model of cohesive soil based on triggered viscoplastic element

ZHAO Cheng-bin, LUO Ya-sheng, FAN Quan, MENG Zhi-tian, SUN Zhe   

  1. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
  • Received:2023-03-13 Accepted:2023-07-28 Online:2024-02-11 Published:2024-02-07
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Project of Shaanxi Province (2021JLM-51).

摘要: 基于黏性、弹性和塑性元件构造的动本构模型往往存在预测效果较差,不能完全反映黏性土的黏性、弹性、塑性的缺点。通过引入一种触发式的黏塑性元件ψ,以残余变形为切入点,提出了一个考虑振动稳定和振动衰化现象的黏性土黏弹塑性动本构模型,并通过动三轴试验进行了验证。该动本构模型不但能够描述动荷载作用下黏性土残余应变的发展规律,且能合理地预测动应变的发展情况。结果表明,试样在动荷载作用下,存在元件ψ的黏滞系数随振动周期增长而衰减的现象,且衰减情况和含水率密切相关。最优含水率是影响振动稳定和振动衰化现象的重要参数,当含水率小于最优含水率时,试样变形表现为振动稳定,此时元件ψ黏滞系数的变化可以忽略不计;当含水率大于最优含水率时,试样变形表现为振动衰化,此时元件ψ 黏滞系数的变化不可忽略。

关键词: 触发式黏塑性元件, 残余变形, 振动稳定, 振动衰化, 黏弹塑性动本构模型

Abstract: The dynamic constitutive models based on viscous, elastic, and plastic elements often suffer from poor prediction performance and fail to fully capture the viscous, elastic, and plastic characteristics of cohesive soil. To address these limitations, a viscoelastic-plastic constitutive model for cohesive soil is proposed in this study by introducing a triggered viscoplastic element (symbolized as Ψ) and considering residual deformation as a starting point. The model takes into account the phenomena of vibration stability and vibration decay and is validated through dynamic triaxial shear tests. This dynamic constitutive model not only describes the development pattern of residual strain in cohesive soil under dynamic loads but also provides reasonable predictions for dynamic strain development. The results indicate that the viscosity coefficient of the Ψ element decays as the vibration period increases, and this attenuation is closely related to the moisture content under dynamic loading conditions. The optimal moisture content serves as an important parameter that influences both vibration stability and vibration decay. When the moisture content is less than the optimal moisture content, the deformation of the sample exhibits vibration stability, and the change of the viscosity coefficient can be ignored. When the moisture content is greater than the optimal moisture content, the deformation of the sample exhibits vibration decay, and the change of the viscosity coefficient cannot be neglected.

Key words: triggered viscoplastic element, residual deformation, vibration stability, vibration decay, viscoelastic-plastic dynamic constitutive model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 李 帅,朱万成,牛雷雷,李如飞,李少华. 动态扰动对应力松弛岩石变形行为影响的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2795-2804.
[2] 段敏克,蒋长宝,俞 欢,陆天宇,钮彬炜,孙东玲,. 分级加-卸载条件下原煤的渗透及能耗特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1346-1354.
[3] 赵 凯,周建军,孙 田,刘德洋,. 考虑排水条件和粗料含量的砂砾石土动残余变形特性[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 926-932.
[4] 刘汉龙,刘 平,杨 贵,肖 杨,刘彦辰,. 高聚物胶凝堆石料动残余变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1863-1868.
[5] 马衍坤 ,刘泽功 ,周 健 ,王维德,. 基于孔壁应变发展规律的压裂孔三阶段起裂特征试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2151-2158.
[6] 王玉赞,迟世春,邵 磊,杨昕光. 堆石料残余变形特性与参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 856-862.
[7] 董威信 ,孙书伟 ,于玉贞 ,孙 逊. 堆石料动力特性大型三轴试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 296-301.
[8] 刘功勋 ,栾茂田 ,唐小微 ,邵 琪 ,张俊峰. 复杂应力条件下原状饱和海洋黏土残余变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 1931-1938.
[9] 左建平 ,谢和平 ,孟冰冰 ,刘建锋. 煤岩组合体分级加卸载特性的试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1287-1296.
[10] 王丽艳 ,陈香香 ,刘汉龙. 液化地基中沉箱码头墙体地震残余变形的有效动应力研究[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3361-3367.
[11] 赵剑明,温彦锋,刘小生,陈 宁,常亚屏,刘启旺,王 宏. 深厚覆盖层上高土石坝极限抗震能力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 41-47.
[12] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011-2015.
[13] 朱 晟,周建波. 粗粒筑坝材料的动力变形特性[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1375-1380.
[14] 王丽艳,姜朋明,刘汉龙. 砂性地基中防波堤地震残余变形机制分析与液化度预测法[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3556-3562.
[15] 于玉贞,刘治龙,孙 逊,张丙印. 面板堆石坝筑坝材料动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 909-914.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[3] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[4] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[5] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[6] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[7] 马 亢,徐 进,吴赛钢,张爱辉. 公路隧道局部塌方洞段的围岩稳定性评价[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2955 -2960 .
[8] 陈 阵,陶龙光,李 涛,李海斌,王综勇. 支护结构作用的箱基沉降计算新方法[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2978 -2984 .
[9] 楚锡华,徐远杰. 基于形状改变比能对M-C准则与 D-P系列准则匹配关系的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2985 -2990 .
[10] 王淑云,鲁晓兵,赵 京,王爱兰. 粉质黏土周期荷载后的不排水强度衰化特性[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2991 -2995 .