岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1190-1200.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0612

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

高位堆积体远程滑坡动力侵蚀过程量化预测模型

韩旭东1, 2,杨秀元1,孙秀娟1,宋伟1,包一丁3,王春辉2   

  1. 1. 中国地质调查局水文地质环境地质调查中心 自然资源部三峡库区地质灾害监测预警野外科学观测研究站,重庆 404700; 2. 中国地质调查局水文地质环境地质调查中心 自然资源部地质环境监测工程技术创新中心,河北 保定 071051; 3. 中国科学院山地灾害与环境研究所 山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-18 接受日期:2023-07-08 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-18
  • 通讯作者: 孙秀娟,女,1969年生,学士,高级工程师,主要从事工程地质与灾害方面的研究工作。E-mail:sunxiujuan@mail.cgs.gov.cn
  • 作者简介:韩旭东,男,1990年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事高位远程滑坡数值模型方面的研究。E-mail:hanxudong@mail.cgs.gov.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(No. 42207229);中国地质调查局地质调查项目(No. DD20221813)。

Quantitative prediction model of dynamic erosion process for long run-out accumulation landslides

HAN Xu-dong1, 2, YANG Xiu-yuan1, SUN Xiu-juan1, SONG Wei1, BAO Yi-ding3, WANG Chun-hui2   

  1. 1. Field Scientific Observation and Research Platform for Geological Hazards Monitoring and Early Warning in Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Natural Resources, Center for Hydrogeology and Environment, China Geological Survey, Chongqing 404700, China; 2. Innovation Center for Geological Environment Monitoring Technology of Ministry of Natural Resources, Center for Hydrogeology and Environment, China Geological Survey, Baoding, Hebei 071051, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
  • Received:2023-05-18 Accepted:2023-07-08 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (42207229) and the Program of Geological Survey, CGS (DD20221813).

摘要: 高位远程滑坡快速解体后,往往形成碎屑流,会沿程动力侵蚀坡体表层第四纪松散物质,改变滑坡滑移动力学特征,导致滑坡体积显著放大,灾害效应强烈,已成为近年来防灾减灾研究的重点。首先,针对高位堆积体远程滑坡动力侵蚀过程量化预测问题,基于深度积分水动力计算理论与固液两相界面剪应力侵蚀模型架构,构建了高位堆积体远程滑坡动力侵蚀过程量化预测的连续介质数值模型,自主进行了数值实现,编制了具有二阶计算精度的软件程序DisasterFlow V1.0。然后,通过经典的溃坝水流算例验证,结果表明所构建的数值模型的数值求解格式正确并具有较好的总变差不增特性(total variation diminishing, TVD)。再后,通过对柏杨林高位堆积体远程滑坡案例动力侵蚀过程预测可知,所构建的数值模型与传统雪橇模型对该滑坡滑移速度预测结果基本一致,但相较于传统雪橇模型,所构建的数值模型对滑动路径地形的适应能力强,滑移速度预测值振荡性较小。最后,利用所构建的数值模型在时间和空间维度上对柏杨林高位堆积体远程滑坡的动力侵蚀过程进行量化表达,结果表明所构建的数值模型能够对该滑坡动力侵蚀过程中各历时的滑移深度、速度及侵蚀堆积深度进行量化,这是传统雪橇模型所不具备的。所做研究可充实高位远程滑坡动力侵蚀过程量化预测理论与技术体系。

关键词: 高位远程滑坡, 动力侵蚀, 数值模型, DisasterFlow V1.0, 量化预测

Abstract: After the rapid disintegration of long run-out accumulation landslides, debris flows are often formed. They dynamically erode the underlying soft materials along their sliding paths and change the dynamic characteristics of landslide movement, which will lead to a significant increase in landslide volume. Long run-out accumulation landslides have strong disaster effects, which has become the focus of disaster prevention and mitigation research in recent years. To address the issue of quantitative prediction of dynamic erosion process for potential long run-out accumulation landslides, a continuum numerical model is constructed based on the depth-integrated hydrodynamic calculation theory and solid-liquid two-phase shear stress erosion model framework. The software program DisasterFlow V1.0 with second-order calculation accuracy is compiled for numerical realization. Through two classic case studies of dam-break flow, the results calculated by the developed model program are highly consistent with the actual situations. The developed numerical solution scheme is correct and has a good total variation diminishing (TVD) behavior. The prediction of dynamic erosion process for the long run-out accumulation landslide in Baiyanglin shows that the developed numerical model and the conventional sled model basically agree with the prediction results of the landslide sliding velocity. Compared with the conventional sled model, the developed numerical model has better adaptability to the terrain of the sliding path, resulting in less oscillation in the predicted values of the landslide sliding velocity. In addition, during the numerical prediction and analysis of the dynamic erosion process for the long run-out accumulation landslide in Baiyanglin, the developed numerical model can quantify the landslide dynamic erosion process in the time and space dimensions, such as quantifying the sliding depth, velocity and accumulation depth in each duration, which are not available in the conventional sled model. This paper provides a feasible quantitative prediction solution of the dynamic erosion process for long run-out accumulation landslides, which could enriches the quantitative prediction theory and technical system for long run-out landslides.

Key words: long run-out landslides, dynamic erosion, numerical model, DisasterFlow V1.0, quantitative prediction

中图分类号: 

  • TU 42
[1] 周凤玺, 巨文涛, 张留俊, . 单向冻结条件下硫酸盐渍土热质迁移及变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 708-716.
[2] 黄波林, 殷跃平, 李滨, 白林丰, 秦臻, . 柱状危岩体坐落式崩塌产生涌浪的 简化数值模型与校验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2269-2278.
[3] 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周 洋, 闫 婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[4] 杨鹏, 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹. 竖井地基的大应变固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4049-4056.
[5] 陈庆发,杨家彩,高 远,牛文静,陈大鹏,刘俊广,. 大型复杂地质体三维数值模型构建方法比较研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 753-760.
[6] 王 超,张社荣,张峰华,杜成波. 基于实时更新数值模型的高陡边坡动态仿真分析方法及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2383-2390.
[7] 季宪军,梁 瑛 ,欧国强 ,杨 顺 ,王 钧 ,陆桂红,. 黏性碎屑流坡面运动过程数值模拟与检验[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2402-2408.
[8] 钱自卫,曹丽文,姜振泉,孙 强. 孔隙砂岩多次化学注浆试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2226-2230.
[9] 刘先珊 ,许 明 . 基于三维流-固耦合模型的油井出砂细观机制研究[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2363-2370.
[10] 陈孟乔,刘建坤,肖军华 . 砂土中盾构隧道开挖面失稳土体三维形状分析[J]. , 2013, 34(4): 961-966.
[11] 郭帅杰 ,王保田 ,张福海 . 沉积泥砂非线性大变形固结沉降计算模型[J]. , 2013, 34(10): 3003-3010.
[12] 高文华,朱建群,张志敏,黄自永. 基于Hoek-Brown非线性破坏准则的软岩地基极限承载力数值模拟[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 593-598.
[13] 刘晓明,罗周全,杨 彪,张 保. 复杂矿区三维地质可视化及数值模型构建[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 4006-4010.
[14] 邓华锋 ,李建林 ,王乐华. 考虑卸荷的加锚裂隙岩体力学参数研究[J]. , 2008, 29(4): 1027-1030.
[15] 张延军 ,赵 龙 ,祁福利 ,倪福全 . 降水效果的数值分析和设计优化研究[J]. , 2008, 29(10): 2673-2677.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .