岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (10): 4049-4056.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0197

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

竖井地基的大应变固结分析

杨鹏,蒲诃夫,宋丁豹   

  1. 华中科技大学 土木工程与力学学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-28 出版日期:2019-10-11 发布日期:2019-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 蒲诃夫,男,1985年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事环境岩土、岩土工程等领域的研究。E-mail: puh@hust.edu.cn E-mail: yangpenghust@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨鹏,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程、机器学习等领域的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No. 2016YFC0800200);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51678268, No. 51878312)。

Analysis of large-strain consolidation of soft soil foundation with prefabricated vertical drains

YANG Peng, PU He-fu, SONG Ding-bao   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2019-01-28 Online:2019-10-11 Published:2019-10-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0800200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678268, 51878312).

摘要: 简单介绍了真空-堆载联合预压下饱和软土竖井地基大变形固结沉降模型(VRCS1模型),该模型能考虑大应变、材料非线性、非达西流、真空折损和竖井未打穿等因素。使用该模型对澳大利亚巴利纳支路某现场沉降进行预测,结果与现场实测数据吻合良好。基于该工程案例,讨论了分级堆载、循环荷载、真空联合堆载、上边界为等应力/等应变条件以及排水板打入深度等因素对竖井地基固结过程的影响规律。计算结果表明:分级堆载可降低土体超静孔压峰值进而改善土体稳定性;循环荷载使土体固结过程发生震荡,且土体沉降峰值迟于超静孔压峰值和荷载峰值出现;真空荷载和堆载作用机制有本质区别,真空荷载不可简单以堆载替代;上边界等应变条件下的固结速率一般快于等应力条件,工程真实条件一般介于两者之间;排水板打入深度超过0.9倍土层厚度时,再加大打入深度加速固结效果不明显。

关键词: 饱和软土, 竖向排水板, 数值模型, 大应变, 参数分析

Abstract: A numerical model, called VRCS1, is developed for large-strain consolidation of saturated soft soil stabilized by PVD under vacuum-surcharge combined preloading. VRCS1 accounts for large strain, material nonlinearity, non-Darcian flow, vacuum loss along PVDs, and partial drain penetration. The estimated settlement using VRCS1 is in good agreement with field measurement for a site at Ballina bypass, Australia. Based on the field soil parameters, we investigated the effects of staged surcharge, cyclic surcharge, vacuum-surcharge combined preloading, equal stress/equal strain at the upper boundary, and PVD penetration depth on the consolidation of soft soil foundation stabilized with PVDs. The simulation results show that the staged surcharge can reduce the peak value of excess pore pressure and thus improve soil stability. The cyclic load produces oscillation during the consolidation process, and the peak value of settlement appears later than the peak values of excess pore pressure and load. There are fundamental differences between vacuum loading and surcharge loading, and vacuum loading cannot be simply replaced by surcharge loading. The consolidation rate under the condition of equal strain at the top boundary is generally faster than that under the condition of equal stress, and the real condition is usually between these two conditions. When the penetration depth of PVD exceeds 0.9 times the thickness of the soil layer, the effect of accelerating consolidation by increasing the penetration depth is weak.

Key words: saturated soft soil, prefabricated vertical drains, numerical model, large strain, parameter analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 447
[1] 甘一雄, 吴顺川, 任义, 张光, . 基于声发射上升时间/振幅与平均频率值的花岗岩劈裂破坏评价指标研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2324-2332.
[2] 龚文惠, 赵旭东, 邱金伟, 李逸, 杨晗. 饱和软土大应变自重固结非线性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2099-2107.
[3] 蒲诃夫, 宋丁豹, 郑俊杰, 周 洋, 闫 婧, 李展毅. 饱和软土大变形非线性自重固结模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1683-1692.
[4] 杨爱武, 潘亚轩, 曹 宇, 尚英杰, 吴可龙, . 吹填软土低位真空预压室内试验及其数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 539-548.
[5] 莫品强, 高新慰, 黄子丰, 马丹阳, . 下穿隧道开挖引起的挤土桩沉降控制分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3823-3832.
[6] 夏长青,胡安峰,崔 军,吕文晓,谢康和, . 饱和软土成层地基一维非线性固结解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2858-2864.
[7] 韩 冰,梁建文,朱 俊,. 深厚饱和软土场地中透镜体对上部结构地震响应的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2227-2236.
[8] 李 磊,蒋明镜,张伏光, . 深部岩石考虑残余强度时三轴试验离散元定量模拟及参数分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1082-1090.
[9] 陈庆发,杨家彩,高 远,牛文静,陈大鹏,刘俊广,. 大型复杂地质体三维数值模型构建方法比较研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 753-760.
[10] 王 超,张社荣,张峰华,杜成波. 基于实时更新数值模型的高陡边坡动态仿真分析方法及应用[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2383-2390.
[11] 倪 静 ,朱 颖 ,陈有亮 ,杜 曦 ,Cholachat Rujikiatkamjorn,. 循环荷载作用下竖向排水板加固软黏土的孔隙水压力累积特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(2): 383-389.
[12] 季宪军,梁 瑛 ,欧国强 ,杨 顺 ,王 钧 ,陆桂红,. 黏性碎屑流坡面运动过程数值模拟与检验[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2402-2408.
[13] 钱自卫,曹丽文,姜振泉,孙 强. 孔隙砂岩多次化学注浆试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2226-2230.
[14] 项彦勇,任 鹏. 壁面局部接触裂隙岩体水流-传热的一种理论模型及计算分析[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2845-2854.
[15] 刘先珊 ,许 明 . 基于三维流-固耦合模型的油井出砂细观机制研究[J]. , 2013, 34(8): 2363-2370.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!