深埋单线铁路隧道衬砌高水压分界值研究

›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (10): 1675-1680.

深埋单线铁路隧道衬砌高水压分界值研究

高新强，仇文革

西南交通大学土木工程学院，成都 610031

收稿日期:2004-09-30 出版日期:2005-10-10 发布日期:2013-12-30
作者简介:高新强，男，1970年生，博士研究生，讲师，从事高水压山岭隧道围岩稳定性及结构受力机理等方面的研究
基金资助:
铁道部科技发展计划项目（No.2001G009-2），西南交通大学博士研究生创新基金项目。

Research on the boundary value of high hydraulic pressure upon lining in deep-lying single-track railway tunnel

GAO Xin-qiang, QIU Wen-ge

School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China

Received:2004-09-30 Online:2005-10-10 Published:2013-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 作用在隧道衬砌上的水压力多大称为高水压？隧道工程界一直没有明确的分界值。以单线铁路隧道标准设计图为基础，以不用改变标准设计断面形状为原则，采用平面有限元方法计算和分析了衬砌的安全系数能否满足规范要求，研究了隧道衬砌高水压分界值。研究结果表明：单线铁路隧道直墙式衬砌高水压第一分界值为0.05～0.10 MPa，第二分界值为 0.18 MPa；曲墙式衬砌高水压第一分界值为0.20 MPa，第二分界值为0.40 MPa。水压力较大时，水压力成为衬砌结构上的主要荷载，高水压力分界值与围岩级别的关系不大，而与衬砌断面形状关系密切，曲墙式衬砌承受水压力的能力远远超过直墙式衬砌。单线铁路隧道按标准设计断面如果要承受水压也是有限的，超过40 m的静水头最好采取其它优化型式的断面。

关键词: 铁路隧道, 衬砌结构, 高水压分界值

Abstract: How much of hydraulic pressure value upon lining may be intituled high hydraulic pressure? Now, there isn’t clear boundary value in the field of tunnel engineering. The boundary value of high hydraulic pressure was researched by calculating and analyzing the safety factor of lining whether achieving the railway tunnel design code requirement or not, using plane FEM based on standard design drawings of single-track railway tunnel, needn’t change the shape of standard design cross-section as principle. The results show that in single-track railway tunnel, the first boundary value of high hydraulic pressure upon upright wall lining is 0.05－0.10 MPa and the second boundary value is 0.18 MPa; The first boundary value of high hydraulic pressure upon curved wall lining is 0.20 MPa and the second boundary value is 0.40 MPa. Hydraulic pressure is the main load upon lining when its value is higher. The boundary value of high hydraulic pressure is rarely related to the surrounding rock classification but is closely related to the shape of lining section. Curved wall lining’s capacity hydraulic pressure bearing is far higher than upright one. The capacity hydraulic pressure bearing of standard design section in single-track railway tunnel is limited. Other optimized sections should be used when static head is higher than 40m.

Key words: railway tunnel, lining, boundary value of high hydraulic pressure

中图分类号:

U 455.91

高新强，仇文革. 深埋单线铁路隧道衬砌高水压分界值研究[J]. , 2005, 26(10): 1675-1680.

GAO Xin-qiang, QIU Wen-ge. Research on the boundary value of high hydraulic pressure upon lining in deep-lying single-track railway tunnel[J]. , 2005, 26(10): 1675-1680.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	吴顺川，韩伟，陈钒，徐淼斐，丛子杰，. 基于膨胀本构的石膏岩隧道衬砌缓冲层厚度优化研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1182-1191.
[2]	杨文波，陈子全，徐朝阳，晏启祥，何川，韦凯, . 盾构隧道与周围土体在列车振动荷载作用下的动力响应特性[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 537-545.
[3]	袁宗浩，蔡袁强，袁万，徐芫蕾，曹志刚, . 地铁列车荷载作用下饱和土中圆形衬砌隧道和轨道系统动力响应分析[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1003-1014.
[4]	李波，吴立，邓宗伟，陈剑，唐爱松,. 高速铁路隧道围岩抗力系数现场试验与理论研究[J]. , 2015, 36(2): 532-541.
[5]	苏雅，杨明辉，苏永华，梁斌. 深埋隧道衬砌稳定可靠度的Kriging插值法与遗传算法协同优化求解法[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2661-2666.
[6]	何本国，朱永全，孙明磊，张志强，孙元国 . 高速铁路膏溶角砾岩深埋隧道支护荷载确定方法[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 827-832.
[7]	李忠友，刘元雪，刘树林，谭仪忠，葛增超 . 火灾作用下隧道衬砌结构变形理论分析模型[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 307-310.
[8]	曾杰，靳晓光，张永兴. 隧道衬砌结构三轴压缩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 115-119.
[9]	周毅，李术才，李利平，赵岩，刘钦，原小帅. 地层条件对超大断面隧道软弱破碎围岩施工影响过程规律的数值模拟分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 673-678.
[10]	晏启祥，马婷婷，陈菲. 泄水式管片衬砌泄流量对衬砌外荷载的影响研究[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1108-1112.
[11]	叶培旭，杨新安，凌保林，张业炜. 近距离交叉隧洞爆破对既有隧道的振动影响[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 537-541.
[12]	李建军，邵生俊，熊田芳. 隧道斜交穿越地裂缝的模型试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 115-120.
[13]	周太全，华渊. 东巨寺沟隧道湿喷纤维混凝土支护结构和围岩稳定性位移模糊判别[J]. , 2008, 29(5): 1377-1381.
[14]	姜领发，王建华，周香莲. 半空间饱和土中圆形衬砌对弹性压缩波的散射[J]. , 2008, 29(2): 315-320.
[15]	龚伦，仇文革，高新强,. 铁路隧道近距离下穿楼房控制爆破试验研究[J]. , 2006, 27(S1): 1089-1092.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed