›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 351-358.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河口粉土强度丧失与恢复过程现场振动试验研究

贾永刚,史文君,单红仙,许国辉,刘红军,郑建国   

  1. 中国海洋大学 岩土与环境工程系,山东 青岛 266003
  • 收稿日期:2003-11-17 出版日期:2005-03-10 发布日期:2013-11-21
  • 作者简介:贾永刚,男,1965年生,教授,博士生导师,从事海洋工程地质环境研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.40172088),山东省自然科学基金资助项目(No.Q99E10),国家重点规划项目(973)(No.2002CB412400)

In-situ test study on silt strength’s loss and recovery due to vibration load in the Yellow River mouth

JIA Yong-gang, SHI Wen-jun, SHAN Hong-xian, XU Guo-hui, LIU Hong-jun, ZHENG Jian-guo   

  1. Department of Geoenvironmental Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003,China
  • Received:2003-11-17 Online:2005-03-10 Published:2013-11-21

摘要: 在黄河口潮坪上选择典型研究区,进行了模拟波浪荷载的现场振动试验,利用轻型静力触探仪测记振动前、振动刚刚结束以及静置一段时间后土体贯入阻力的强度值,研究了海床土强度的丧失、恢复过程及影响因素。研究结果发现:模拟波浪荷载振动导致土体强度丧失发生在海底面下一定深度范围内,强度丧失量和恢复量沿深度呈抛物线型变化。振动后,土体表面排出的水和细粒物质环绕振动点周围形成一系列微型“泥火山”。振动导致土强度最大恢复量值与强度最大丧失量值出现在同一深度处;振动结束2 h后,土体强度超过振动前原状土体强度,振动使土体强度丧失与恢复受土体曾经历的水动力作用强弱、振动前土体的原始强度、振动荷载的循环次数、振动能量大小、土体的深度、静置的时间等因素的影响显著。黄河口海床土体强度独特变化规律的成因机理有待进一步研究。

关键词: 黄河口粉土, 强度丧失与恢复, 现场振动试验

Abstract: To simulate the sea bed strength’s loss and recovery due to the wave load, we chose typical study areas on the tidal flat of the Yellow River Mouth, and carried out in-situ impactive vibration test. We got the silt’s penetration value before and just after the vibration, also the silt’s penetration value after several periods of time. Using these penetration values,we have done some research on the procedure and influential factors of silt strength’s loss and recovery. From the reseach, we found that the strength loss caused by vibration occurs at certain depth under the sea bed, and the variation of silt strength’s loss and recovery appears like a parabola along the depth. After the vibration, water and fine object appear at the surface layer of the silt, and a series of minimal mud volcanoes come into being around the vibration site. The silt’s maximum strength recovery appears at the same depth as the maximum loss. After three-hour recovery, the silt strength surpassed the silt strength before the vibration. The following factors remarkably affect the silt strength’s loss and recovery, the hydrodynamic action that the silt had experienced, the silt’s original strength, circular times of vibration load, the vibration energy, the silt depth and the time of recovery, etc. The mechanism of silt’s strength variation due to vibration and recovery is very special and further study of the mechanism is required.

Key words: silt in Yellow River mouth, strength loss and recovery, in-situ vibration test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441+8
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 孙 勇. 滑坡面下双排抗滑结构的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2971 -2977 .
[2] 王 威,王水林,汤 华,周平根. 基于三维GIS的滑坡灾害监测预警系统及应用[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3379 -3385 .
[3] 杨海清,周小平. 边坡落石运动轨迹计算新方法[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3411 -3416 .
[4] 李鸿博,郭小红. 公路连拱隧道土压力荷载的计算方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3429 -3434 .
[5] 鲁祖德,陈从新,陈建胜,童志怡,左保成,戴旭明. 岭澳核电三期强风化角岩边坡岩体直剪试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3783 -3787 .
[6] 曹雪山,殷宗泽. 非饱和土二维固结简化计算的研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2575 -2580 .
[7] 高 千,王 靖,杨志法,张路青,祝介旺,郑 舰,傅 燕. 龙游石窟1~3号洞室稳定性分析及安全通道路线的选择[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2713 -2721 .
[8] 马远刚,杨春和. 极限状态及变形量控制下自平衡试桩承载力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2787 -2791 .
[9] 瞿万波,刘新荣,傅晏,秦晓英. 洞桩法大断面群洞交叉隧道初衬数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2799 -2804 .
[10] 汪 洋,周 丽,殷坤龙. 基于土条周边水压力分析的水下滑体稳定性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1068 -1071 .