煤岩组合体分级加卸载特性的试验研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1287-1296.

煤岩组合体分级加卸载特性的试验研究

左建平^{1, 2}，谢和平^{2, 3}，孟冰冰²，刘建锋³

1.中国矿业大学(北京) 煤炭资源与安全开采国家重点试验室，北京 100083； 2.中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院岩石力学与分形研究所，北京 100083；3.四川大学水利水电学院，成都 610065

收稿日期:2011-02-01 出版日期:2011-05-10 发布日期:2011-09-23
作者简介:左建平，男，1978年生，博士，副教授，主要从事岩石力学、损伤、断裂及数值计算等方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)计划资助项目（No. 2010CB732002, No. 2011CB201201）；高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目（No. 201030）；教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划（No. NCET-09-0726）

Experimental research on loading-unloading behavior of coal-rock combination bodies at different stress levels

ZUO Jian-ping^{1, 2}, XIE He-ping^{2, 3}, MENG Bing-bing², LIU Jian-feng³

1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Institute of Rock Mechanics and Fractals, School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing 100083, China; 3. School of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Sichuan, Chengdu 610065, China

Received:2011-02-01 Online:2011-05-10 Published:2011-09-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过MTS 815试验机研究了煤岩组合体分级加卸载试验。分级加卸载下煤岩组合体破坏以脆性破坏机制为主，与单轴作用相比，分级加卸载作用下煤岩组合体的破坏更为破碎，且破坏强度有所提高，但轴向和环向应变却有所降低。同一循环中的加载与卸载曲线基本不重合，且多数情况不形成闭合环路；卸载曲线与下一个循环的加载曲线通常也不重合，但会形成闭合环路。第1循环结束时残余变形较大，加卸载曲线形成了类似“牛角”状的曲线；随着循环加卸载地进行，与残余变形相比第1循环有所降低，加载和卸载曲线在逐渐靠近，并且加卸载曲线类似“竹叶”状。获得了残余变形和加卸载弹性模量随循环加卸载的变化关系，并且实验表明卸载到1 MPa附近时，卸载线是曲折波动的；但在再次加载初期，加载线几乎是直线，且随着荷载的继续增加，加载线和上一个循环的卸载线逐渐分离。循环加卸载后应变相位逐渐滞后于应力相位，内因可能是因为岩石矿物颗粒间的黏滞性以及煤岩组合体界面之间的摩擦引起的，而外因可能是循环加卸载导致了煤岩体内部损伤，并由此诱发不可恢复的残余变形

关键词: 煤岩组合体, 分级加卸载, 残余变形, 耗散能, 加卸载弹性模量

Abstract: In this paper, MTS 815 test system has been used to study the failure behavior of coal-rock combination bodies under different stress level cyclic loading-unloading. Experimental indicates that brittle failure is also the failure mechanism of coal-rock combination body under cyclic loading-unloading, but the failure under cyclic loading-unloading is more fragmentized than that under uniaxial loading. The failure strength under cyclic loading-unloading is higher than that under uniaxial loading; but the axial and circumferential strain in the contrast. The loading curves of coal-rock combination body are usually not coincidence with the unloading curves. In addition, they usually do not form a closed loop. In the first cycle, the residual deformation is large, and the loading-unloading curve forms a horn-shaped curve. The relationships of the residual deformations and the loading-unloading elastic modulus with the advancing of cyclic loading-unloading have been obtained in our tests, respectively. At the reverse position of unloading and loading, when unloading to about 1 MPa, the unloading line is fluctuant; however loading again, loading line is almost straight line in the early. In the all of cycles, some cycle loading lines are nearly coincidence with the unloading curves, some form sharp edges, or some forms cross lines. With the increasing of the loading, the loading curves separate gradually with the unloading curves. With the advancing of loading and unloading, strain phase gradually lags stress phase. The internal factors are the viscosity of rock minerals and the friction between the interface between coal and rock, and the external factors are the irreversible residual deformation under cyclic loading and unloading.

Key words: coal-rock combination, different level loading-unloading, residual deformation, energy dissipation, elastic modulus of loading and unloading

中图分类号:

TU 43

左建平，谢和平，孟冰冰，刘建锋. 煤岩组合体分级加卸载特性的试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1287-1296.

ZUO Jian-ping , XIE He-ping , MENG Bing-bing , LIU Jian-feng. Experimental research on loading-unloading behavior of coal-rock combination bodies at different stress levels[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1287-1296.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李帅，朱万成，牛雷雷，李如飞，李少华. 动态扰动对应力松弛岩石变形行为影响的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2795-2804.
[2]	段敏克，蒋长宝，俞欢，陆天宇，钮彬炜，孙东玲,. 分级加-卸载条件下原煤的渗透及能耗特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1346-1354.
[3]	赵凯，周建军，孙田，刘德洋，. 考虑排水条件和粗料含量的砂砾石土动残余变形特性[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 926-932.
[4]	刘汉龙，刘平，杨贵，肖杨，刘彦辰，. 高聚物胶凝堆石料动残余变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1863-1868.
[5]	李天斌，陈子全，陈国庆，马春驰，唐欧玲，王敏杰. 不同含水率作用下砂岩的能量机制研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 229-236.
[6]	罗飞，赵淑萍，马巍，焦贵德,. 由滞回曲线的形态特征分析冻结黏土的动力特性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 299-304.
[7]	马衍坤，刘泽功，周健，王维德，. 基于孔壁应变发展规律的压裂孔三阶段起裂特征试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2151-2158.
[8]	王玉赞，迟世春，邵磊，杨昕光. 堆石料残余变形特性与参数敏感性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 856-862.
[9]	董威信，孙书伟，于玉贞，孙逊. 堆石料动力特性大型三轴试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 296-301.
[10]	刘功勋，栾茂田，唐小微，邵琪，张俊峰. 复杂应力条件下原状饱和海洋黏土残余变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 1931-1938.
[11]	郭东明，左建平，张毅，杨仁树. 不同倾角组合煤岩体的强度与破坏机制研究[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1333-1339.
[12]	王丽艳，陈香香，刘汉龙. 液化地基中沉箱码头墙体地震残余变形的有效动应力研究[J]. , 2011, 32(11): 3361-3367.
[13]	赵剑明，温彦锋，刘小生，陈宁，常亚屏，刘启旺，王宏. 深厚覆盖层上高土石坝极限抗震能力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 41-47.
[14]	魏星，王刚，余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011-2015.
[15]	朱晟，周建波. 粗粒筑坝材料的动力变形特性[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1375-1380.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed