›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (S2): 269-274.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

悬臂-拉裂式崩塌破坏机制研究

王根龙1 2,伍法权2,祁生文2   

  1. 1. 中国地质调查局西安地质调查中心 国土资源部黄土地质灾害重点实验室,西安 710054; 2. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所 中国科学院工程地质力学重点实验室,北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-01 出版日期:2012-11-22 发布日期:2012-12-11
  • 作者简介:王根龙,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土工程、地质工程等方面研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    中国博士后科学基金资助(No. 20090450565);交通部西部交通建设科技项目资助(No. 200831822353)

Research on failure mechanisms for cantilever and tension crack-type collapse

WANG Gen-long1, 2,WU Fa-quan2,QI Shen-gwen2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory for Geo-hazards in Loess Area of Ministry of Land and Resources, Xi’an Center of Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Xi’an 710054, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Engineering Geomechanics, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2012-06-01 Online:2012-11-22 Published:2012-12-11

摘要: 悬臂-拉裂式崩塌是崩塌类型中较为常见的一种,常发育于近水平层状的陡峻岩质边坡,在我国的西南和西北山区以及三峡库区,该类危岩体的数量多且崩塌发生频率高。调查研究表明,差异风化剥蚀、河流侧蚀、海水浪蚀、碳酸盐溶蚀等作用是岩质边坡产生凹进岩腔和凸出悬臂的外动力地质作用。在调查基础上,概化出厚层硬岩夹薄层软岩和薄层硬岩夹软岩两种悬臂梁崩塌破坏模式。根据悬臂梁最大弯曲应力计算理论,推导出岩腔极限深度计算公式,并结合岩石风化剥蚀速率,对悬臂梁危岩体产生破坏的时间进行了预测。通过岩腔极限深度计算公式的分析和悬臂梁崩塌野外调查结果,均表明岩腔极限深度与悬臂岩体厚度成正相关,而与顶部裂缝深度比成负相关。根据最大拉应力-抗拉强度比值分析法,推导出悬臂梁危岩体稳定系数计算公式,并给出其稳定性评价标准。通过典型算例,对文中方法的正确性进行检验,结果表明该方法具有公式简单和计算可靠等优点。

关键词: 岩腔, 悬臂梁, 崩塌, 稳定系数, 岩质边坡

Abstract: The cantilever and tension crack-type collapses, which often occurred in steep rock slopes with nearly horizontal layered stratum, are very common in nature. This kind of perilous rock mass is not only much in quantity but also high in frequency of occurrence in mountainous areas of southwest and northwest China and Three Gorges area in China. The research shows some exogenic geological processes such as differential weathering, river erosion, seawater abrasion and carbonate dissolution can cause rock cavities and cantilevers on the surface of rock slopes. On the basis of field investigation, two kinds of failure modes for cantilever and tension crack-type collapse have been established. The two different failure modes are thick hard rock inter-bedded by thin weak layer and thin hard rock inter-bedded by weak layer respectively. According to the calculation theory of maximum bending stress for cantilever beam, the formulas of limit depth for rock cavity has been derived; and moreover, the time of failure of a collapse has been predicted using the rate of weather denudation for limestone. Analysis results show that the limit depth of rock cavity is positively correlated with the thickness of cantilever and negatively correlated with the depth of tension crack on the top of slope. According to the method of ratio of maximum tensile stress to tensile strength, a formula of safety factor has been deduced. Furthermore, the evaluation criteria for cantilever and tension crack-type collapses are given. Finally, the new method is verified by a typical case study; and the results show that some features such as concise formula and reliable calculation are obvious in the actual project application.

Key words: rock cavity, cantilever beam, collapse, safety factor, rock slope

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[2] 刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与 破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[3] 言志信, 龙哲, 屈文瑞, 张森, 江平, . 地震作用下含软弱层岩体边坡锚固 界面剪切作用分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2882-2890.
[4] 朱仁杰, 车爱兰, 严 飞, 文 海, 葛修润, . 含贯通性结构面岩质边坡动力演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1907-1915.
[5] 任晋岚, 陈曦, 王冬勇, 吕彦楠. 基于广义Hoek-Brown准则的瞬时线性化 强度折减技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4865-4872.
[6] 蒋水华,刘 贤,姚 池,杨建华,黄劲松,江先河,. 低概率水平岩质边坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2991-3000.
[7] 肖国峰,陈从新. 岩质块体渐进破坏的稳定分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3001-3010.
[8] 卞 康,刘 建,胡训健,李鹏程,陈玲朱,刘振平, . 含顺层断续节理岩质边坡地震作用下的破坏模式与动力响应研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3029-3037.
[9] 许 明,唐亚锋,刘先珊,罗 斌,唐道勇,. 自适应锚索锚固岩质边坡地震动力响应分析[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2379-2386.
[10] 周 勇,王旭日,朱彦鹏,李京榜,蒋小奎,. 强风化软硬互层岩质高边坡监测与数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2249-2258.
[11] 李 韬,徐奴文,戴 峰,李天斌,樊义林,李 彪,. 白鹤滩水电站左岸坝肩开挖边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 665-674.
[12] 陈龙龙,陈从新,夏柏如,夏开宗,付 华,邓洋洋,宋许根,孙朝燚,. 程潮铁矿东区地面塌陷机制及扩展机制初探[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2322-2334.
[13] 徐奴文,李 韬,戴 峰,李 彪,樊义林,徐 剑,. 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸岩质边坡稳定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2358-2367.
[14] 范 刚,张建经,付 晓, . 含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡传递函数及其应用研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1052-1059.
[15] 黄小福,张迎宾,赵兴权,余鹏程,邢 昊,张 珏,陈岩岩,. 地震条件下危岩崩塌运动特性的初步探讨[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 583-592.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[3] 雷金波,陈从新. 基于双曲线模型的带帽刚性桩复合地基荷载传递机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3385 -3391 .
[4] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[5] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[6] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[7] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .
[8] 唐世斌,唐春安,李连崇,张永彬. 湿度扩散诱发的隧洞时效变形数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 697 -0703 .
[9] 席人双,陈从新,肖国锋,黄平路. 结构面对程潮铁矿东区地表及岩体移动变形的影响研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 532 -538 .
[10] 黄 阜,杨小礼,赵炼恒,黄 戡. 基于Hoek-Brown破坏准则的浅埋条形锚板抗拔力上限分析[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 179 -184 .