›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S2): 74-80.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

土工格栅加筋掺砂黄土工程性质试验研究

胡幼常1, 2,申俊敏1,赵建斌1,顾光斗2,蔡华南2   

  1. 1. 山西省交通科学研究院 黄土地区公路建设与养护技术交通行业重点实险室,太原 030006;2. 武汉理工大学 交通学院,武汉 430063
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-11 出版日期:2013-11-11 发布日期:2013-11-19
  • 作者简介:胡幼常,男,1961年生,博士,副教授,主要从事道路岩土工程方面的研究
  • 基金资助:

    黄土地区公路建设与养护技术交通行业重点实验室开放课题(No. KLTLR-Y11-5)

Experimental study of engineering properties of geogrid-reinforced loess mixed with sand

HU You-chang1, 2,SHEN Jun-min1,ZHAO Jian-bin1,GU Guang-dou2,CAI Hua-nan2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Highway Construction & Maintenance Technique in Loess Region, Shanxi Provincial Research Institute of Communications, Taiyuan 030006, China; 2 School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
  • Received:2013-06-11 Online:2013-11-11 Published:2013-11-19

摘要: 为了寻找实用而有效的方法来降低用黄土填筑的桥头路堤沉降并提高其强度以避免桥头跳车,提出了在黄土中掺砂、用土工格栅加筋或两种方法同时采用的建议。为了研究这些建议的可行性,采用室内回弹模量试验和无侧限抗压试验分别研究了土工格栅加筋黄土和加筋掺砂黄土的变形和强度特性。对黄土和掺砂黄土分别完成了压实度为88%、92%和96%,加筋层数为0~5层组合工况下多组试样的回弹模量和无侧限抗压试验,对试验结果进行了详细的对比分析,得到以下结论:(1)掺砂和土工格栅加筋都可以明显提高黄土的回弹模量,两种方法同时使用效果更佳;(2)不管有无土工格栅加筋,掺砂都能使黄土强度大幅度提高,尤其在小应变下其提高的幅度更大;(3)在压实度不变而加筋层数增多时,或加筋层数不变而压实度下降时,土工格栅加筋掺砂黄土的应力-应变曲线由应变软化型逐渐向应变硬化型转变;(4)加筋掺砂黄土存在筋-土强度合理匹配问题,压实度高时应布置较密的加筋层,以使二者变形协调,从而实现加筋掺砂黄土强度的最大化。

关键词: 掺砂黄土, 土工格栅加筋, 回弹模量, 无侧限压缩, 室内试验

Abstract: In order to find out an effective and practical approach to reduce the settlement and increase the strength of an approach embankment filled with loess so as to avoid the bump at bridgehead, the methods were suggested by mixing a proportion of sand into the loess or reinforcing the loess with geogrid, or by using these two skills together. For examining essentially the feasibility of these ideas, the deformation and strength properties of geogrid-reinforced loess, loess mixed with sand (LMS) and geogrid-reinforced LMS were investigated in laboratory. A series of resilient modulus tests and unconfined compression tests were conducted respectively using samples made up of LMS or pure loess either with or without geogrid-inclusions. Each sample varied either in the number of reinforcement layers from 0 to 5, or in the degrees of compaction of 88%, 92% or 96%. Based on a detail analysis of the test results, the following conclusions are drawn: (1) The resilient modulus of the loess increases significantly either by mixed with sand or by reinforced with geogrid. More improvement is demonstrated while the both methods are applied together in a loess sample. (2) The compressive strength of LMS is much greater than that of loess when the LMS and the loess both are either with or without geogrid inclusions, especially under small compressive strain. (3) The compressive stress-strain pattern of a geogrid-reinforced LMS changes gradually from strain-softening to strain-hardening either while the geogrid layers increase at a certain degree of compaction or when the degree of compaction decreases at a given geogrid layers. (4) There is an appropriate strength match between the geogrid and the LMS, according to which a geogrid-reinforced LMS with higher density is suggested to be reinforced with smaller reinforcement spacing so as to obtain a maximum strength derived from a compatible deforming between the geogrid and the soil.

Key words: loess mixed with sand, geogrid-reinforcement, resilient modulus, unconfined compression, laboratory test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 451
[1] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[2] 刘方成, 吴孟桃, 杨 峻, . 土工格栅加筋橡胶砂强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 580-591.
[3] 张 聪,梁经纬,张 箭,阳军生,张贵金,叶新田,. 基于脉动注浆的宾汉流体渗透扩散机制研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2740-2746.
[4] 王 俊,王 闯,何 川,胡雄玉,江英超,. 砂卵石地层土压盾构掘进掌子面稳定性室内试验与三维离散元仿真研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3038-3046.
[5] 杨 贵,孙 欣,王阳阳, . 高聚物堆石料回弹特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1669-1674.
[6] 赵明华,唐咸力,肖 尧,杨超炜. 考虑厚跨比的基桩下伏溶洞顶板冲切特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1159-1167.
[7] 钱劲松,李嘉洋,周 定,凌建明. 考虑吸力效应的非饱和黏土回弹模量预估模型[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 123-128.
[8] 杨海朋,白 冰,聂庆科,. 赤泥渗沥液对黏性土和固化赤泥影响的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 299-304.
[9] 孙凯强,唐朝生,刘昌黎,李昊达,王 鹏,冷 挺. 土体龟裂研究方法[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 11-26.
[10] 王新志,王 星,刘海峰,孟庆山,朱长歧,. 珊瑚礁地基工程特性现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2065-2070.
[11] 喻豪俊,彭社琴,赵其华,吴 浩,丁梓涵,穆红海, . 斜坡碎石土地基水平抗力系数研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1682-1687.
[12] 陈育民,王 睿,张艳萍, . 饱和悬浮塑料砂流动特性的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 67-74.
[13] 储 亚,查甫生,刘松玉,蔡国军,寇 博,. 基于电阻率法的膨胀土膨胀性评价研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 157-164.
[14] 温 勇,杨光华,汤连生,徐传堡,黄致兴,黄忠铭,张玉成, . 广州地区花岗岩残积土力学特性试验及参数研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 209-215.
[15] 李巧燕 ,王惠栋 ,马国伟 ,李之建 ,周汉民 ,崔 旋,. 尾矿坝筑坝模袋力学性能试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 957-964.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[2] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[3] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[4] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[5] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[6] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[9] 杨召亮,孙冠华,郑 宏. 基于潘氏极大值原理的边坡稳定性的整体分析法[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 559 -563 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .