›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 209-215.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.025

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

广州地区花岗岩残积土力学特性试验及参数研究

温 勇1, 2, 3,杨光华2, 3, 4,汤连生1,徐传堡4,黄致兴4,黄忠铭4,张玉成2, 3   

  1. 1. 中山大学 地球科学与地质工程学院,广东 广州 510275;2. 广东省水利水电科学研究院,广东 广州 510610; 3. 广东省岩土工程技术研究中心,广东 广州 510610;4. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510641
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-08 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 汤连生,男,1963年生,教授,主要从事岩土工程、地质工程、岩土化学力学及水—岩土相互作用等方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: eestls@ mail.sysu.edu.cn E-mail:wy876633@163.com
  • 作者简介:温勇,男,1987年生,博士,高级工程师,广东省水利水电科学研究院在站博士后(中山大学企业博士后),主要从事土的本构理论、原位试验等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51378131,No.41572277);全国高等学校博士学科专项科研基金(No.20120171110031);广东省自然科学基金(No.2015A030313118);广东省岩土工程技术研究中心开放基金(No.201404002)。

Tests and parameters study of mechanical properties of granite residual soil in Guangzhou area

WEN Yong1, 2, 3, YANG Guang-hua2, 3, 4, TANG Lian-sheng1, XU Chuan-bao4, HUANG Zhi-xing4, HUANG Zhong-ming4, ZHANG Yu-cheng2, 3   

  1. 1. School of Earth Science and Geological Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China; 2. Guangdong Research Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 3. Geotechnical Engineering Technology Center of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510610, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510641, China
  • Received:2016-06-08 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378131, 41572277), Specialized Research Foundation of Dr Discipline of the National Institutions of Higher Learning (20120171110031), National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong (2015A030313118), and Open Foundation of Geotechnical Engineering Technology Center of Guangdong Province (201404002).

摘要: 花岗岩残积土属区域性特殊土,一般具有较强的结构性,准确获得其力学参数是进行基坑等工程设计的前提条件。针对广州地区花岗岩残积土,开展系列力学特性试验研究,包括压板载荷试验、标贯试验以及室内侧限压缩、直剪等常规试验,基于试验结果得到工程中常用的花岗岩残积土力学参数,并进行对比分析及验证。结果表明,由花岗岩残积土室内直剪试验强度参数(黏聚力c、内摩擦角 )计算得到的地基极限承载力以及由室内侧限压缩试验得到的花岗岩残积土变形参数均明显小于实测值;由压板载荷试验反算得到的花岗岩残积土c、 和变形模量E50计算p-s曲线结果与实测结果较为吻合;由标贯试验结果得到的花岗岩残积土E50则与由压板载荷试验得到的E50结果接近,说明压板载荷试验、标贯试验可作为花岗岩残积土力学参数的合理确定方法之一。

关键词: 广东地区花岗岩残积土, 原位试验, 室内试验, 力学参数

Abstract: Granite residual soil is a regional special kind of soil which also has strong structural feature in general case. The accurate evaluation of its mechanical properties is a precondition for foundation pit and other engineering design of granite residual soil. Based on the results of a series of mechanical tests of granite residual soil in Guangzhou area, which includes plate loading test, standard penetration test and some routine laboratory test including confined compression and direct shear tests, comparative analysis and verification of the common mechanical parameters of granite residual soil are presented in this paper. The results show that the ultimate bearing capacity of foundation calculated by parameters (cohesion c, friction angle ) of granite residual soil obtained by the direct shear test, and the deformation parameter of granite residual soil obtained by the confined compression test are both significantly lower than the measured results; while the p-s curves results calculated by parameters (c, and deformation modulus E50) of granite residual soil obtained by the plate loading test are close to measured results. The E50 of granite residual soil obtained by the standard penetration test is also close to the E50 obtained by the plate loading test. Therefore, the plate loading test and standard penetration test are proved to be one of the rational ways for determining mechanical parameters of granite residual soil, which can be for reference.

Key words: granite residual soil in Guangzhou area, in-situ test, laboratory test, mechanical parameters

中图分类号: 

  • TU 433
[1] 姚玉文, 刘方成, 补国斌, 景立平, . 橡胶砂弹性动力学参数的弯曲-伸缩元试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2369-2379.
[2] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[3] 谌民, 张涛, 单华刚, 王新志, 孟庆山, 余克服, . 钙质砂压缩波速与物理性质参数关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2275-2283.
[4] 张 聪,梁经纬,张 箭,阳军生,张贵金,叶新田,. 基于脉动注浆的宾汉流体渗透扩散机制研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2740-2746.
[5] 王 俊,王 闯,何 川,胡雄玉,江英超,. 砂卵石地层土压盾构掘进掌子面稳定性室内试验与三维离散元仿真研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3038-3046.
[6] 姜光成,胡乃联,洪根意,李国清,方京珍,. 基于GSI值量化和修正方法的岩体力学参数确定[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2211-2218.
[7] 赵明华,唐咸力,肖 尧,杨超炜. 考虑厚跨比的基桩下伏溶洞顶板冲切特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1159-1167.
[8] 宿 辉, 杨家琦, 胡宝文, 高 轩, 马 辉, . 颗粒离散元岩石模型的颗粒尺寸效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4642-4651.
[9] 崔 臻,盛 谦, . 裂隙岩体等效力学参数结构效应的计算机模拟试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3830-3840.
[10] 孙凯强,唐朝生,刘昌黎,李昊达,王 鹏,冷 挺. 土体龟裂研究方法[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 11-26.
[11] 杨海朋,白 冰,聂庆科,. 赤泥渗沥液对黏性土和固化赤泥影响的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 299-304.
[12] 喻豪俊,彭社琴,赵其华,吴 浩,丁梓涵,穆红海, . 斜坡碎石土地基水平抗力系数研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1682-1687.
[13] 苏承东,韦四江,秦本东,杨玉顺,. 高温对细砂岩力学性质影响机制的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 623-630.
[14] 江 权,崔 洁,冯夏庭,刘国锋,王百林,刘 挺,吕勇刚,. 玄武岩力学参数的随机性统计与概率分布估计[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 784-792.
[15] 陈育民,王 睿,张艳萍, . 饱和悬浮塑料砂流动特性的试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 67-74.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!